High-dose rifampicin for 3 months after culture conversion for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis.

IF 2.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.4046/trd.2024.0099
Nakwon Kwak, Joong-Yub Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung-Soo Kwon, Jae Ho Lee, Jeongha Mok, Yong-Soo Kwon, Young Ae Kang, Youngmok Park, Ji Yeon Lee, Doosoo Jeon, Jung-Kyu Lee, Jeong Seong Yang, Jake Whang, Kyung Jong Kim, Young Ran Kim, Minkyoung Cheon, Jiwon Park, Seokyung Hahn, Jae-Joon Yim
{"title":"High-dose rifampicin for 3 months after culture conversion for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis.","authors":"Nakwon Kwak, Joong-Yub Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung-Soo Kwon, Jae Ho Lee, Jeongha Mok, Yong-Soo Kwon, Young Ae Kang, Youngmok Park, Ji Yeon Lee, Doosoo Jeon, Jung-Kyu Lee, Jeong Seong Yang, Jake Whang, Kyung Jong Kim, Young Ran Kim, Minkyoung Cheon, Jiwon Park, Seokyung Hahn, Jae-Joon Yim","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04485156.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2024.0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen.

Method: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates.

Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04485156.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对药物敏感的肺结核进行培养转换后,大剂量利福平治疗 3 个月。
背景:本研究旨在确定较短的大剂量利福平治疗方案是否优于标准的 6 个月结核病治疗方案:本研究旨在确定较短的大剂量利福平治疗方案是否优于为期 6 个月的结核病标准治疗方案:这项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效试验招募了经 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测或结核分枝杆菌培养呈呼吸道标本阳性且无利福平耐药性的参与者。参与者按 1:1 随机分配到研究组或对照组。研究组接受大剂量利福平(30 毫克/千克/天)、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺治疗,直到培养结果转阴,然后再接受大剂量利福平和异烟肼治疗 12 周。对照组接受为期 6 个月的标准疗法。主要结果是随机后18个月的不利结果发生率。非劣效性边际设定为 "结果":在 2020 年 11 月 4 日至 2022 年 1 月 3 日期间,共有 76 名参与者入组。其中 58 人被纳入修改后的意向治疗分析。对照组 32 人中有 10 人(31.3%)出现不利结果,研究组 26 人中有 10 人(38.5%)出现不利结果。差异为 7.2%(95% 置信区间,∞ 至 31.9%),未能证明非劣效性。两组的严重不良事件和3级或以上不良事件没有差异:结论:较短的大剂量利福平方案未能证明非劣效性,但其安全性是可以接受的。试验注册 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04485156。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Features of Lung Cysts in Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome from Patients with Multiple Lung Cysts. Request for Study Design Modification in Examining Nutritional Intake and Muscle Strength in Individuals with Airflow Limitation. Air Pollution and Interstitial Lung Disease. Dry Medical Thoracoscopy with Artificial Pneumothorax Induction Using Veress Needle. Clinical characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to smoking status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1