Development of a Health-State Classification System for the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales for Preference-Based Valuation in Australia.
Joseph Kwon, Rakhee Raghunandan, Son Hong Nghiem, Kirsten Howard, Emily Lancsar, Elisabeth Huynh, Martin Howell, Stavros Petrou, Sarah Smith
{"title":"Development of a Health-State Classification System for the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales for Preference-Based Valuation in Australia.","authors":"Joseph Kwon, Rakhee Raghunandan, Son Hong Nghiem, Kirsten Howard, Emily Lancsar, Elisabeth Huynh, Martin Howell, Stavros Petrou, Sarah Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL GCS), comprising 23 items covering 4 subscales (physical, emotional, social, and school functioning), is a widely applied generic measure of childhood health-related quality of life but does not provide health utilities for cost-effectiveness-based decision making. This study aimed to develop a reduced item version of PedsQL GCS amenable to health utility derivation in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data sources were 2 cohorts of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, including proxy responses for all PedsQL GCS versions (Toddlers, Young Children, Children, and Teens), and the CheckPoint sample containing child self-report to the Children version. Three analytic samples were CheckPoint sample (n = 1874); Mallinson sample containing 1 measurement per child from one of the Young Children, Children, or Teens versions (n = 7855); and Toddlers sample (n = 7401). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses assessed dimensionality. Psychometric analyses used Rasch and classical criteria on 3 randomly selected subsamples (n = 500) per sample. Item selection prioritized psychometric performance in the CheckPoint sample, also considering performance in other samples and conceptual content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dimensionality assessments did not generate an alternative empirical structure for the measure, and psychometric analyses were conducted on the original 4 subscales. The selected items were: \"Get aches and pains\" for physical functioning; \"Feel sad/blue\" for emotional functioning; \"Other kids not friends\" for social functioning; and \"Keeping up with school work\" for school functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final 4-item set, pending further psychometric validation and valuation, can generate health utilities from the widely used PedsQL GCS to inform cost-effectiveness-based decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL GCS), comprising 23 items covering 4 subscales (physical, emotional, social, and school functioning), is a widely applied generic measure of childhood health-related quality of life but does not provide health utilities for cost-effectiveness-based decision making. This study aimed to develop a reduced item version of PedsQL GCS amenable to health utility derivation in Australia.
Methods: Data sources were 2 cohorts of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, including proxy responses for all PedsQL GCS versions (Toddlers, Young Children, Children, and Teens), and the CheckPoint sample containing child self-report to the Children version. Three analytic samples were CheckPoint sample (n = 1874); Mallinson sample containing 1 measurement per child from one of the Young Children, Children, or Teens versions (n = 7855); and Toddlers sample (n = 7401). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses assessed dimensionality. Psychometric analyses used Rasch and classical criteria on 3 randomly selected subsamples (n = 500) per sample. Item selection prioritized psychometric performance in the CheckPoint sample, also considering performance in other samples and conceptual content.
Results: Dimensionality assessments did not generate an alternative empirical structure for the measure, and psychometric analyses were conducted on the original 4 subscales. The selected items were: "Get aches and pains" for physical functioning; "Feel sad/blue" for emotional functioning; "Other kids not friends" for social functioning; and "Keeping up with school work" for school functioning.
Conclusions: The final 4-item set, pending further psychometric validation and valuation, can generate health utilities from the widely used PedsQL GCS to inform cost-effectiveness-based decision making.
期刊介绍:
Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.