Dysmenorrhea-Related Impact on Functioning Scale: Development and Measurement Properties for Cisgender Women and Transgender Men.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.007
Guilherme T Arruda, Maria Eduarda C B da Silva, Barbara I da Silva, Patricia Driusso, Mariana A Avila
{"title":"Dysmenorrhea-Related Impact on Functioning Scale: Development and Measurement Properties for Cisgender Women and Transgender Men.","authors":"Guilherme T Arruda, Maria Eduarda C B da Silva, Barbara I da Silva, Patricia Driusso, Mariana A Avila","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop the Dysmenorrhea-related Impact on Functioning Scale (DIFS) to assess the impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning in cisgender women and transgender men and to evaluate its measurement properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed and online design study conducted with adolescents and adult cisgender women and transgender men with dysmenorrhea. We developed the DIFS based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Content validity was assessed with experts and people with dysmenorrhea. Item Response Theory developed the DIFS total score. Structural validity was assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency by Cronbach's α and McDonald's Ω. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were assessed by correlation between DIFS and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. Measurement error was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3335 people participated in the study. The DIFS is a 15-item instrument divided into \"Bodily Functions\" and \"Daily Activities and Social Participation\" sections and \"Functioning\" as a general factor. Internal consistency (α and Ω > 0.7) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9) were adequate. No systematic error was found. Correlation was positive and strong between World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule and \"Functioning\" (r = 0.62, P ≤ .05). For the DIFS total score, higher scores indicate a greater impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning, and 44 points is the cutoff point for classifying the person with a significant impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DIFS showed excellent measurement properties for assessing the impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning for cisgender women and transgender men.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop the Dysmenorrhea-related Impact on Functioning Scale (DIFS) to assess the impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning in cisgender women and transgender men and to evaluate its measurement properties.

Methods: Mixed and online design study conducted with adolescents and adult cisgender women and transgender men with dysmenorrhea. We developed the DIFS based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Content validity was assessed with experts and people with dysmenorrhea. Item Response Theory developed the DIFS total score. Structural validity was assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency by Cronbach's α and McDonald's Ω. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were assessed by correlation between DIFS and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. Measurement error was also assessed.

Results: A total of 3335 people participated in the study. The DIFS is a 15-item instrument divided into "Bodily Functions" and "Daily Activities and Social Participation" sections and "Functioning" as a general factor. Internal consistency (α and Ω > 0.7) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9) were adequate. No systematic error was found. Correlation was positive and strong between World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule and "Functioning" (r = 0.62, P ≤ .05). For the DIFS total score, higher scores indicate a greater impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning, and 44 points is the cutoff point for classifying the person with a significant impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning.

Conclusions: DIFS showed excellent measurement properties for assessing the impact of dysmenorrhea on functioning for cisgender women and transgender men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痛经相关功能影响量表(DFS):针对顺性别女性和变性男性的开发和测量特性。
目的:开发痛经相关功能影响量表(DIFS开发痛经相关功能影响量表(DIFS),以评估痛经对顺性女性和变性男性功能的影响,并评估其测量特性:方法:对患有痛经的青少年和成年顺性别女性和变性男性进行了混合和在线设计研究。我们根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》开发了 DIFS。与专家和痛经患者共同评估了内容效度。项目反应理论得出了 DIFS 的总分。结构效度通过探索性和确认性因子分析进行评估,内部一致性通过 Cronbach's α 和 McDonald's Ω 进行评估。结构效度和重测信度分别通过 DIFS 与 WHODAS 之间的相关性和类内相关系数(ICC)进行评估。此外,还对测量误差进行了评估:共有 3335 人参与了研究。DIFS由15个项目组成,分为 "身体功能 "和 "日常活动与社会参与 "两个部分,"功能 "为总因子。DIFS 的内部一致性(α 和 Ω > 0.7)和重测可靠性(ICC > 0.9)良好。没有发现系统误差。WHODAS 与 "功能 "之间呈强正相关(r = 0.62,p ≤ 0.05)。就DIFS总分而言,得分越高表明痛经对功能的影响越大,而44分则是将痛经对功能有显著影响的人归类的分界点:DIFS在评估痛经对顺性女性和变性男性功能的影响方面表现出了良好的测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Value Attribution for Combination Treatments: Two Potential Solutions for an Insoluble Problem. Evaluating the health and economic impacts of return-to-work interventions: a modelling study. Exploring social preferences for health and wellbeing across the digital divide. A qualitative investigation based on tasks taken from an online discrete choice experiment. Quantifying low-value care in Germany: An observational study using statutory health insurance data from 2018 to 2021. Indirect Costs of Alzheimer's Disease: Unpaid Caregiver Burden and Patient Productivity Loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1