Individualized Homeopathic Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Post-COVID-19 Conditions: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Feasibility Trial.
{"title":"Individualized Homeopathic Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Post-COVID-19 Conditions: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Abhijit Rana, Pulakendu Bhattacharya, Subhasish Ganguly, Sangita Saha, Satyajit Naskar, Shubhamoy Ghosh, Abdur Rahaman Shaikh, Munmun Koley, Subhranil Saha, Shyamal Kumar Mukherjee","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Evidence suggests that post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with reduced health-related quality of life, and up to 80% of those infected with COVID-19 may experience these symptoms. The objective of the present study was to identify the effects of individualized homeopathic medicinal products (IHMPs) against placebos in postCOVID-19 conditions. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled, feasibility trial. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Sixty participants with post-COVID-19 conditions. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Group verum (<i>n</i> = 30; IHMPs plus concomitant care) versus group control (<i>n</i> = 30; placebos plus concomitant care). <b><i>Outcome Measures:</i></b> Feasibility issues; primary-post-COVID-19 symptoms checklist; secondary-Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile version 2 (MYMOP-2); all of them were measured at baseline, and monthly intervals, up to 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed; group differences were reported using descriptive statistics: means, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and between group effect sizes (Cohen's <i>d</i>). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Feasibility concerns showed promise; recruitment, retention, and attrition rates were 34.2%, 95%, and 5%, respectively. Group differences in both primary and secondary outcomes favored IHMPs against placebos: symptoms checklist score mean difference after 3 months: -4.2, 95% CI -4.9 to -3.4, <i>d</i> = 2.854 and MYMOP-2 mean difference after 3 months: -2.2, 95% CI -2.8 to -1.7, <i>d</i> = 2.082, respectively. <i>Natrum muriaticum</i> (11.7%), <i>Pulsatilla nigricans</i> (10%), <i>Rhus toxicodendron</i> (8.3%), and <i>Calcarea carbonica</i> (8.3%) were the most frequently prescribed remedies. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IHMPs produced better results than placebos in reducing symptoms checklist scores and MYMOP-2 scores in the treatment of post-COVID-19 conditions. Definitive trials are warranted to confirm the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"64-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Evidence suggests that post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with reduced health-related quality of life, and up to 80% of those infected with COVID-19 may experience these symptoms. The objective of the present study was to identify the effects of individualized homeopathic medicinal products (IHMPs) against placebos in postCOVID-19 conditions. Design: Double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled, feasibility trial. Setting: D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Subjects: Sixty participants with post-COVID-19 conditions. Interventions: Group verum (n = 30; IHMPs plus concomitant care) versus group control (n = 30; placebos plus concomitant care). Outcome Measures: Feasibility issues; primary-post-COVID-19 symptoms checklist; secondary-Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile version 2 (MYMOP-2); all of them were measured at baseline, and monthly intervals, up to 3 months. The intention-to-treat sample was analyzed; group differences were reported using descriptive statistics: means, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and between group effect sizes (Cohen's d). Results: Feasibility concerns showed promise; recruitment, retention, and attrition rates were 34.2%, 95%, and 5%, respectively. Group differences in both primary and secondary outcomes favored IHMPs against placebos: symptoms checklist score mean difference after 3 months: -4.2, 95% CI -4.9 to -3.4, d = 2.854 and MYMOP-2 mean difference after 3 months: -2.2, 95% CI -2.8 to -1.7, d = 2.082, respectively. Natrum muriaticum (11.7%), Pulsatilla nigricans (10%), Rhus toxicodendron (8.3%), and Calcarea carbonica (8.3%) were the most frequently prescribed remedies. Conclusions: IHMPs produced better results than placebos in reducing symptoms checklist scores and MYMOP-2 scores in the treatment of post-COVID-19 conditions. Definitive trials are warranted to confirm the findings.