Homogeneity of pharmacological prescription and control measures applied in cases of scabies detected amongst inmates in Catalonia.

Efrain A Moreno-Valdiris, Carlos Gallego, Indiana Jesús Abdo, Angels Flores-Imbernón, María Elisa Vaz, Carlos Touzon, Andrés Marco
{"title":"Homogeneity of pharmacological prescription and control measures applied in cases of scabies detected amongst inmates in Catalonia.","authors":"Efrain A Moreno-Valdiris, Carlos Gallego, Indiana Jesús Abdo, Angels Flores-Imbernón, María Elisa Vaz, Carlos Touzon, Andrés Marco","doi":"10.18176/resp.00090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the homogeneity of pharmacological prescription and control measures applied in cases of scabies in prisons in Catalonia.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Observational, multicenter, and retrospective study. Cases of scabies from March 01, 2021 and March 01, 2022 were analyzed according to the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) 2020 criteria: a) confirmed cases; b) clinically probable cases; and c) suspected cases.Epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and regimental control variables were collected. We checked whether the interventions were homogeneous in each site. The mean and standard deviation were used as continuous variables and percentages and confidence interval (95%) for discrete variables. The Chi-square test was used to determine statistical association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>269 cases were detected (21.2% confirmed, 50.2% clinically probable and 28.6% suspected). 61.3% were treated with permethrin, 18.6% with ivermectin and 20.1% with both. 27.1% of the cases were withdrawn.There were no significant in-site differences in the study of contacts, isolation and treatment of clothing and belongings, but there were significant differences in the prescription of drugs (P <0.001), duration of treatment (P <0.001) and disinfection of the cell (P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The number of detected cases is estimated to be high, and the majority (71.4%) confirmed or clinically probable. Control measures are homogeneous, except for cell disinfection, which was conventional in 59.1%. Pharmacological treatment and its duration varied between prisons. It would be advisable to establish a protocol to standardize control measures applied to new cases in the centers of Catalonia and subsequently evaluate their efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":30044,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Sanidad Penitenciaria","volume":"26 2","pages":"72-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Sanidad Penitenciaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/resp.00090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To review the homogeneity of pharmacological prescription and control measures applied in cases of scabies in prisons in Catalonia.

Material and method: Observational, multicenter, and retrospective study. Cases of scabies from March 01, 2021 and March 01, 2022 were analyzed according to the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) 2020 criteria: a) confirmed cases; b) clinically probable cases; and c) suspected cases.Epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and regimental control variables were collected. We checked whether the interventions were homogeneous in each site. The mean and standard deviation were used as continuous variables and percentages and confidence interval (95%) for discrete variables. The Chi-square test was used to determine statistical association.

Results: 269 cases were detected (21.2% confirmed, 50.2% clinically probable and 28.6% suspected). 61.3% were treated with permethrin, 18.6% with ivermectin and 20.1% with both. 27.1% of the cases were withdrawn.There were no significant in-site differences in the study of contacts, isolation and treatment of clothing and belongings, but there were significant differences in the prescription of drugs (P <0.001), duration of treatment (P <0.001) and disinfection of the cell (P <0.001).

Discussion: The number of detected cases is estimated to be high, and the majority (71.4%) confirmed or clinically probable. Control measures are homogeneous, except for cell disinfection, which was conventional in 59.1%. Pharmacological treatment and its duration varied between prisons. It would be advisable to establish a protocol to standardize control measures applied to new cases in the centers of Catalonia and subsequently evaluate their efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加泰罗尼亚囚犯中发现的疥疮病例所采用的药物处方和控制措施的一致性。
目的审查加泰罗尼亚监狱中疥疮病例的药方和控制措施的一致性:观察性、多中心和回顾性研究。根据国际疥疮控制联盟(IACS)2020 年的标准,对 2021 年 3 月 1 日和 2022 年 3 月 1 日的疥疮病例进行了分析:a) 确诊病例;b) 临床可能病例;c) 疑似病例。我们检查了每个地点的干预措施是否一致。连续变量采用平均值和标准差,离散变量采用百分比和置信区间(95%)。结果:共发现 269 个病例(21.2%确诊,50.2%临床可能,28.6%疑似)。61.3%的病例接受了氯菊酯治疗,18.6%的病例接受了伊维菌素治疗,20.1%的病例同时接受了两种治疗。27.1%的病例被撤销。在研究接触者、隔离和处理衣物及物品方面没有明显的地区差异,但在药物处方方面存在显著差异(P 讨论):据估计,发现的病例数量较多,大多数(71.4%)已确诊或临床可能确诊。除 59.1%的病例采用常规的细胞消毒外,其他控制措施都很一致。药物治疗及其持续时间因监狱而异。加泰罗尼亚各中心最好制定一项协议,对新病例采取标准化的控制措施,并随后对其疗效进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical approach to a complex wound in prison: blunt trauma. COVID-19 and anxiety amongst health professionals in prisons. Effectiveness of therapeutic patient education on diabetes in prison. Evaluation of dental emergency during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Social Rehabilitation Centre of San Francisco Kobén (Campeche, Mexico). Homogeneity of pharmacological prescription and control measures applied in cases of scabies detected amongst inmates in Catalonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1