Measuring Anxiety in Autistic Children: Assessing the Validity of the Anxiety Scale for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Keira Goulding, Linda Campbell, Emily Freeman
{"title":"Measuring Anxiety in Autistic Children: Assessing the Validity of the Anxiety Scale for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Keira Goulding, Linda Campbell, Emily Freeman","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14090168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study assessed the validity of one of the first autism-specific anxiety measures, the Anxiety Scale for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASC-ASD), and compared its ability to predict parent-reported clinical anxiety to a 'traditional' anxiety measure, the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS). Whether the inclusion of the child form for each measure improved the predictive ability of the parent forms was also examined. Eighty-seven parents of autistic children, aged 8-12 years, completed the ASC-ASD, the SCAS, and the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), a screener for autism characteristics. Of these parents, 56 had their child complete the ASC-ASD and SCAS. The children with a reported anxiety diagnosis were rated significantly higher by their parents on both the SCAS and the ASC-ASD compared to the non-anxious children. Pearson's correlation coefficients indicated that the ASC-ASD had good divergent and convergent validity, as demonstrated by a poor, non-significant correlation with the SCQ and a strong, significant correlation with the SCAS. Regression analyses indicated that while the ASC-ASD was a significant predictor of parent-reported clinical anxiety in autistic children, the SCAS was not. Neither model was improved with the inclusion of the respective child form. This study is the first to demonstrate the ability of the ASC-ASD to predict child clinical anxiety disorder status and adds to the growing body of evidence for the validity of this measure. The findings also suggest that parent reports of anxiety may be sufficient to identify autistic children warranting further clinical investigation of anxiety in this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 9","pages":"2542-2559"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11431172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14090168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study assessed the validity of one of the first autism-specific anxiety measures, the Anxiety Scale for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASC-ASD), and compared its ability to predict parent-reported clinical anxiety to a 'traditional' anxiety measure, the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS). Whether the inclusion of the child form for each measure improved the predictive ability of the parent forms was also examined. Eighty-seven parents of autistic children, aged 8-12 years, completed the ASC-ASD, the SCAS, and the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), a screener for autism characteristics. Of these parents, 56 had their child complete the ASC-ASD and SCAS. The children with a reported anxiety diagnosis were rated significantly higher by their parents on both the SCAS and the ASC-ASD compared to the non-anxious children. Pearson's correlation coefficients indicated that the ASC-ASD had good divergent and convergent validity, as demonstrated by a poor, non-significant correlation with the SCQ and a strong, significant correlation with the SCAS. Regression analyses indicated that while the ASC-ASD was a significant predictor of parent-reported clinical anxiety in autistic children, the SCAS was not. Neither model was improved with the inclusion of the respective child form. This study is the first to demonstrate the ability of the ASC-ASD to predict child clinical anxiety disorder status and adds to the growing body of evidence for the validity of this measure. The findings also suggest that parent reports of anxiety may be sufficient to identify autistic children warranting further clinical investigation of anxiety in this age group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量自闭症儿童的焦虑程度:评估自闭症谱系障碍儿童焦虑量表的有效性。
本研究评估了首批自闭症专用焦虑量表之一--自闭症谱系障碍儿童焦虑量表(ASC-ASD)的有效性,并将其预测家长报告的临床焦虑的能力与 "传统 "焦虑量表--斯彭斯儿童焦虑量表(SCAS)进行了比较。此外,还考察了在每种测量中加入儿童表是否会提高家长表的预测能力。87 名 8-12 岁自闭症儿童的家长完成了 ASC-ASD、SCAS 和社会交流问卷 (SCQ)(一种自闭症特征筛选器)。在这些家长中,有 56 位让他们的孩子完成了 ASC-ASD 和 SCAS。在 SCAS 和 ASC-ASD 两项测试中,被诊断出患有焦虑症的儿童在家长心目中的评分明显高于未患有焦虑症的儿童。皮尔逊相关系数表明,ASC-ASD 与 SCQ 的相关性差且不显著,而与 SCAS 的相关性强且显著,这表明 ASC-ASD 具有良好的发散性和收敛性。回归分析表明,ASC-ASD 可显著预测家长报告的自闭症儿童临床焦虑,而 SCAS 则不然。加入相应的儿童表格后,两个模型都没有得到改善。本研究首次证明了 ASC-ASD 预测儿童临床焦虑症状况的能力,并为该测量方法的有效性提供了更多证据。研究结果还表明,家长的焦虑报告可能足以识别自闭症儿童,因此需要对这一年龄组的焦虑症进行进一步的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
FOBism Unveiled: Quantifying Assimilative Racism within Asians in the United States. The Mental Suffering of Cocaine-Addicted Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Personality Disorders' Prevalence and Their Association with Psychopathological Symptoms. The Role of Family in the Life Satisfaction of Young Adults: An Ecological-Systemic Perspective. Interculturality in the Development of Technology-Mediated Courses for Massive Health Education: A Systematic Review. The Mediating Role of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in the Relationship between Adult Attachment and Quality of Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1