Predicting collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians: A regression analysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 NURSING European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/192696
Liesa Beier, Qendresa Thaqi, Ans Luyben, Nina Kimmich, Rahel Naef
{"title":"Predicting collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians: A regression analysis.","authors":"Liesa Beier, Qendresa Thaqi, Ans Luyben, Nina Kimmich, Rahel Naef","doi":"10.18332/ejm/192696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians improves patient safety and obstetrical outcomes, but its implementation remains challenging. Therefore, its determinants need to be better understood. This study examined factors impacting collaborative practice (CP) between these professional groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a cross-sectional survey that took place in Swiss hospital labor wards in 2021. Collaborative practice perceptions of 70 midwives (57.4% response rate) and 44 obstetricians (29.0% response rate) were assessed using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale, with the score serving as the main outcome. A total of 13 individual, behavioral, and organizational predictors were analyzed by multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated collaborative practice with a median score of 3.1 (IQR: 2.8-3.4) out of a maximum score of 4.0. Results showed that five predictors significantly influenced collaborative practice: type of profession (β= -0.180; 95% CI: -0.296 - -0.040, p=0.011), trust/respect (β=0.343; 95% CI: 0.085-0.040, p=0.000), shared visions/goals (β=0.218; 95% CI: 0.030-0.204, p=0.009), workplace (β=0.253; 95% CI: 0.089-0.445, p=0.004) and shared power (β=0.163; 95% CI: 0.042-0.222, p=0.015). The model explained 66% of the variance (adjusted R2) in collaborative practice in labor wards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has identified key factors influencing CP in Swiss labor wards: workplace characteristics that require tailored CP models, and a power-sharing culture that fosters trust, respectful interactions and shared goals, requiring active exchange between midwives and obstetricians.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"8 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/192696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians improves patient safety and obstetrical outcomes, but its implementation remains challenging. Therefore, its determinants need to be better understood. This study examined factors impacting collaborative practice (CP) between these professional groups.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey that took place in Swiss hospital labor wards in 2021. Collaborative practice perceptions of 70 midwives (57.4% response rate) and 44 obstetricians (29.0% response rate) were assessed using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale, with the score serving as the main outcome. A total of 13 individual, behavioral, and organizational predictors were analyzed by multiple linear regression.

Results: Participants rated collaborative practice with a median score of 3.1 (IQR: 2.8-3.4) out of a maximum score of 4.0. Results showed that five predictors significantly influenced collaborative practice: type of profession (β= -0.180; 95% CI: -0.296 - -0.040, p=0.011), trust/respect (β=0.343; 95% CI: 0.085-0.040, p=0.000), shared visions/goals (β=0.218; 95% CI: 0.030-0.204, p=0.009), workplace (β=0.253; 95% CI: 0.089-0.445, p=0.004) and shared power (β=0.163; 95% CI: 0.042-0.222, p=0.015). The model explained 66% of the variance (adjusted R2) in collaborative practice in labor wards.

Conclusions: This study has identified key factors influencing CP in Swiss labor wards: workplace characteristics that require tailored CP models, and a power-sharing culture that fosters trust, respectful interactions and shared goals, requiring active exchange between midwives and obstetricians.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士与产科医生合作实践的预测:回归分析。
导言:助产士与产科医生之间有效的合作实践可提高患者安全和产科效果,但其实施仍具有挑战性。因此,需要更好地了解其决定因素。本研究探讨了影响这些专业群体之间合作实践(CP)的因素:本研究是一项横断面调查,于 2021 年在瑞士医院产房进行。采用跨专业协作量表对 70 名助产士(57.4% 的响应率)和 44 名产科医生(29.0% 的响应率)的协作实践感知进行了评估,以得分作为主要结果。通过多元线性回归分析了共 13 个个人、行为和组织预测因素:结果:参与者对协作实践的评分中位数为 3.1(IQR:2.8-3.4),最高分为 4.0。结果显示,五个预测因子对合作实践有明显影响:职业类型(β= -0.180;95% CI:-0.296 -0.040,p=0.011)、信任/尊重(β=0.343;95% CI:0.085-0.040,p=0.000)、共同愿景/目标(β=0.218;95% CI:0.030-0.204,p=0.009)、工作场所(β=0.253;95% CI:0.089-0.445,p=0.004)和共同权力(β=0.163;95% CI:0.042-0.222,p=0.015)。该模型解释了产房协作实践 66% 的方差(调整后 R2):本研究发现了影响瑞士产房中产房协作实践的关键因素:工作场所的特点需要量身定制的产房协作实践模式,以及促进信任、相互尊重的互动和共同目标的权力分享文化,这需要助产士和产科医生之间的积极交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Maternal mortality in the Republic of Cyprus: Insights from population-based observations 2004-2022. One million more midwives: Why the world needs them now. The impact of an eight-week online physical activity intervention on sleep quality in early pregnancy: A pilot study using objective measurement. Exploring midwifery students' experiences of clinical training in planned home birth: A qualitative study. The ATHENA Study: Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on Greek midwives' knowledge and attitudes toward LGBTQ+ reproductive and perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1