Analysis of factors associated with use of real-world data in single technology appraisals of cancer drugs by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
{"title":"Analysis of factors associated with use of real-world data in single technology appraisals of cancer drugs by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence","authors":"Jiyeon Kang , John Cairns","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study investigates factors associated with use of real-world data (RWD) in economic modelling for single technology appraisals (STAs) of cancer drugs by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to improve systematic understanding of the use of RWD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The data were extracted from STAs of cancer drugs, for which NICE issued guidance between January 2011 and December 2022 (n=267). Binary regression was used to test hypotheses concerning the greater or lesser use of RWD. Bonferroni-Holm correction was used to control error rates in multiple hypotheses tests. Several explanatory variables were considered in this analysis, including time (<em>Time</em>), incidence rate of disease (<em>IR</em>), availability of direct treatment comparison (<em>AD</em>), generalisability of trial data (<em>GE</em>), maturity of survival data in trial (<em>MS</em>) and previous technology recommendations by NICE (<em>PR</em>). The primary outcome variable was <em>any</em> use of RWD. Secondary outcome variables were specific uses of RWD in economic models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>AD</em> had a statistical negative association with <em>any</em> use of RWD whereas no associations with <em>non-parametric</em> and <em>parametric</em> use of RWD were found. <em>Time</em> had several statistical associations with use of RWD (validating survival distributions for the intervention, estimating progression-free survival for the intervention, estimating overall survival for comparators and transition probabilities).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RWD were more likely to be used in economic modelling of cancer drugs when randomised controlled trials failed to provide relevant clinical information of the drug for appraisals, particularly in the absence of direct treatment comparisons. These results, based on analysis of data systematically collected from previous appraisals, suggest that uses of RWD were associated with data gaps in the economic modelling. While this result may support some of the claimed advantages of using RWD when evidence is absent, the question, the extent to which use of RWD in indirect treatment comparisons reduces uncertainty is still to be determined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study investigates factors associated with use of real-world data (RWD) in economic modelling for single technology appraisals (STAs) of cancer drugs by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to improve systematic understanding of the use of RWD.
Methods
The data were extracted from STAs of cancer drugs, for which NICE issued guidance between January 2011 and December 2022 (n=267). Binary regression was used to test hypotheses concerning the greater or lesser use of RWD. Bonferroni-Holm correction was used to control error rates in multiple hypotheses tests. Several explanatory variables were considered in this analysis, including time (Time), incidence rate of disease (IR), availability of direct treatment comparison (AD), generalisability of trial data (GE), maturity of survival data in trial (MS) and previous technology recommendations by NICE (PR). The primary outcome variable was any use of RWD. Secondary outcome variables were specific uses of RWD in economic models.
Results
AD had a statistical negative association with any use of RWD whereas no associations with non-parametric and parametric use of RWD were found. Time had several statistical associations with use of RWD (validating survival distributions for the intervention, estimating progression-free survival for the intervention, estimating overall survival for comparators and transition probabilities).
Conclusions
RWD were more likely to be used in economic modelling of cancer drugs when randomised controlled trials failed to provide relevant clinical information of the drug for appraisals, particularly in the absence of direct treatment comparisons. These results, based on analysis of data systematically collected from previous appraisals, suggest that uses of RWD were associated with data gaps in the economic modelling. While this result may support some of the claimed advantages of using RWD when evidence is absent, the question, the extent to which use of RWD in indirect treatment comparisons reduces uncertainty is still to be determined.