The benefits of early pulmonary rehabilitation with incentive spirometer among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Q3 Medicine Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Y L Andrea Ban, A S Siti Istiana, N A Nik Nuratiqah, B H Ng, O Rose Azzlinda, J Hasni, S Z Syed Zulkifli
{"title":"The benefits of early pulmonary rehabilitation with incentive spirometer among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Y L Andrea Ban, A S Siti Istiana, N A Nik Nuratiqah, B H Ng, O Rose Azzlinda, J Hasni, S Z Syed Zulkifli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inspiratory muscle dysfunction is prevalent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to compare the benefits of adding volume incentive spirometry (VIS) to active-cycle-breathing technique (ACBT) and ground-based walking (GBW) training in patients hospitalised for COPD exacerbations. The objectives were to evaluate the impact of early initiation of VIS on respiratory muscle strength, measured by maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) and the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), as well as on symptoms, as assessed by the COPD assessment test (CAT) score.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomised, prospective study was conducted among COPD subjects admitted with exacerbation between June 2021 and August 2022. Subjects were randomly assigned to either the VIS (interventional group) or the control group. Baseline assessments, including spirometry, MIP, CAT score, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), were performed. Both groups commenced active cycle of breathing techniques (ACBT) and groundbased walking (GBW) training within 72 hours of admission, with daily sessions involving three repetitions of each phase to complete one cycle, repeated three times daily. The intervention group received VIS. Upon discharge, subjects were provided with a diary and instructed to continue a home-based pulmonary exercise regimen, performed for at least 15 minutes per day, 3 days a week, with compliance monitored through weekly phone calls. At the 4-week followup, repeat assessments of spirometry, MIP, maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), CAT score and 6MWT were conducted to evaluate the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 subjects with a median age of 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 65-74.3 years). The cohort predominantly males (32 subjects, 94%). The distribution of disease severity was as follows: GOLD 2 in 15 subjects (44%) and GOLD 3 in 14 subjects (41%). Additionally, 17 subjects (50%) had experienced three or more exacerbations in the preceding year. The majority of patients (29 out of 34, 85%) had a length of stay of less than 7 days. In the interventional group, the median MIP improved from 50 cm H2O (IQR 40.5-70.5) to 59 cm H2O (IQR 39-76.5), though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.407). The control group saw an improvement from 58 cm H2O (IQR 36.5-85) to 60 cm H2O (IQR 33-88), also not statistically significant (p = 0.112). The 6MWT distance improved in the interventional group from 220 meters (IQR 118-275) to 260 meters (IQR 195-327) (p = 0.002) and in the control group from 250 meters (IQR 144-294) to 280 meters (IQR 213-359.5) (p = 0.001). The median CAT score decreased significantly in the interventional group from 22 (IQR 16-28) to 11 (IQR 7.5-13) (p < 0.001) and in the control group from 21 (IQR 14-24.5) to 10 (IQR 8-12.5) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with acute exacerbations, characterised by poor muscle strength and a history of exacerbations, resulted in significant improvements in patient-reported symptoms and 6MWT outcomes. Although there was only a numerical improvement in MIP and MEP, the intervention did not extend the length of hospital stay, highlighting its safety and efficacy in the acute care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inspiratory muscle dysfunction is prevalent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to compare the benefits of adding volume incentive spirometry (VIS) to active-cycle-breathing technique (ACBT) and ground-based walking (GBW) training in patients hospitalised for COPD exacerbations. The objectives were to evaluate the impact of early initiation of VIS on respiratory muscle strength, measured by maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) and the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), as well as on symptoms, as assessed by the COPD assessment test (CAT) score.

Materials and methods: This randomised, prospective study was conducted among COPD subjects admitted with exacerbation between June 2021 and August 2022. Subjects were randomly assigned to either the VIS (interventional group) or the control group. Baseline assessments, including spirometry, MIP, CAT score, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), were performed. Both groups commenced active cycle of breathing techniques (ACBT) and groundbased walking (GBW) training within 72 hours of admission, with daily sessions involving three repetitions of each phase to complete one cycle, repeated three times daily. The intervention group received VIS. Upon discharge, subjects were provided with a diary and instructed to continue a home-based pulmonary exercise regimen, performed for at least 15 minutes per day, 3 days a week, with compliance monitored through weekly phone calls. At the 4-week followup, repeat assessments of spirometry, MIP, maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), CAT score and 6MWT were conducted to evaluate the outcomes.

Results: A total of 34 subjects with a median age of 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 65-74.3 years). The cohort predominantly males (32 subjects, 94%). The distribution of disease severity was as follows: GOLD 2 in 15 subjects (44%) and GOLD 3 in 14 subjects (41%). Additionally, 17 subjects (50%) had experienced three or more exacerbations in the preceding year. The majority of patients (29 out of 34, 85%) had a length of stay of less than 7 days. In the interventional group, the median MIP improved from 50 cm H2O (IQR 40.5-70.5) to 59 cm H2O (IQR 39-76.5), though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.407). The control group saw an improvement from 58 cm H2O (IQR 36.5-85) to 60 cm H2O (IQR 33-88), also not statistically significant (p = 0.112). The 6MWT distance improved in the interventional group from 220 meters (IQR 118-275) to 260 meters (IQR 195-327) (p = 0.002) and in the control group from 250 meters (IQR 144-294) to 280 meters (IQR 213-359.5) (p = 0.001). The median CAT score decreased significantly in the interventional group from 22 (IQR 16-28) to 11 (IQR 7.5-13) (p < 0.001) and in the control group from 21 (IQR 14-24.5) to 10 (IQR 8-12.5) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Early initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with acute exacerbations, characterised by poor muscle strength and a history of exacerbations, resulted in significant improvements in patient-reported symptoms and 6MWT outcomes. Although there was only a numerical improvement in MIP and MEP, the intervention did not extend the length of hospital stay, highlighting its safety and efficacy in the acute care setting.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期患者中使用激励肺活量计进行早期肺康复治疗的益处。
前言慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者普遍存在吸气肌功能障碍。本研究旨在比较在主动循环呼吸技术(ACBT)和地面步行(GBW)训练的基础上增加容积激励肺活量测定法(VIS)对慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重住院患者的益处。研究目的是评估早期启动 VIS 对呼吸肌力量(通过最大吸气压力(MIP)、最大呼气压力(MEP)和 6 分钟步行测试(6-MWT)测量)以及症状(通过慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试(CAT)评分评估)的影响:这项随机前瞻性研究在 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 8 月期间因慢性阻塞性肺病加重而入院的受试者中进行。受试者被随机分配到 VIS(干预组)或对照组。两组均进行了基线评估,包括肺活量、MIP、CAT 评分和 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)。两组患者均在入院后 72 小时内开始接受主动循环呼吸技术(ACBT)和地面步行(GBW)训练,每天的训练包括每个阶段重复三次以完成一个循环,每天重复三次。干预组接受 VIS。出院时,受试者会收到一本日记,并被要求继续在家进行肺部锻炼,每周 3 天,每天至少 15 分钟,并通过每周电话监测其依从性。在 4 周的随访中,对肺活量、MIP、最大呼气压力 (MEP)、CAT 评分和 6MWT 进行重复评估,以评估结果:共有 34 名受试者,中位年龄为 68 岁(四分位数间距 [IQR] 65-74.3 岁)。男性占多数(32 人,94%)。疾病严重程度分布如下:15 名受试者(44%)为 GOLD 2,14 名受试者(41%)为 GOLD 3。此外,17 名受试者(50%)在过去一年中经历过三次或三次以上的病情加重。大多数患者(34 人中有 29 人,占 85%)的住院时间少于 7 天。介入治疗组的中位 MIP 从 50 cm H2O(IQR 40.5-70.5)提高到 59 cm H2O(IQR 39-76.5),但无统计学意义(P = 0.407)。对照组从 58 厘米水深(IQR 36.5-85)提高到 60 厘米水深(IQR 33-88),也没有统计学意义(p = 0.112)。介入组的 6MWT 距离从 220 米(IQR 118-275)增至 260 米(IQR 195-327)(p = 0.002),对照组则从 250 米(IQR 144-294)增至 280 米(IQR 213-359.5)(p = 0.001)。介入组的CAT评分中位数从22(IQR 16-28)明显降低至11(IQR 7.5-13)(p < 0.001),对照组从21(IQR 14-24.5)明显降低至10(IQR 8-12.5)(p < 0.001):结论:对于肌肉力量较差且有病情加重病史的急性加重患者,及早开始肺康复治疗可显著改善患者报告的症状和 6MWT 结果。虽然 MIP 和 MEP 仅在数值上有所改善,但干预措施并未延长住院时间,突出了其在急症护理环境中的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
期刊最新文献
Adverse event following immunisation of adsorbed-inactivated Coronavac (Sinovac) and ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (Astra Zeneca) of COVID-19 vaccines. Comparison of outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma between a multidisciplinary and a single-speciality centre. Contact sensitisation pattern of patients with eczema at the face and neck region: A retrospective study in Kuala Lumpur. Eating disorders among physically disabled national athletes in Malaysia. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1