Implementation of socially assistive robots in geriatric care institutions: Healthcare professionals' perspectives and identification of facilitating factors and barriers.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20556683241284765
Anne-Sophie Rigaud, Sébastien Dacunha, Clara Harzo, Hermine Lenoir, Imad Sfeir, Matthieu Piccoli, Maribel Pino
{"title":"Implementation of socially assistive robots in geriatric care institutions: Healthcare professionals' perspectives and identification of facilitating factors and barriers.","authors":"Anne-Sophie Rigaud, Sébastien Dacunha, Clara Harzo, Hermine Lenoir, Imad Sfeir, Matthieu Piccoli, Maribel Pino","doi":"10.1177/20556683241284765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The successful integration of socially assistive robots in geriatric care settings hinges on the attitudes and opinions of healthcare professionals. This study explored their needs, expectations, and perceptions regarding robot use, including facilitating factors and barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty professionals participated in semi-structured interviews that covered topics such as robot applications, perceived value, acceptance criteria, prerequisites for deployment, ethical considerations, and design attributes. These interviews were analyzed using a deductive qualitative approach guided by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment model (version 3.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that professionals generally viewed robots favorably, noting their usefulness in various non-intimate tasks like meal assistance and toileting. Ease of use was identified as a critical factor for robot adoption in geriatric care. Furthermore, the necessity of educating all stakeholders and providing comprehensive training to professionals emerged as essential for successful implementation. The discussions also included financial and ethical issues related to the introduction of these technologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings will contribute to develop guidelines for designing and deploying socially assistive robots that align with the preferences and requirements of geriatric care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683241284765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The successful integration of socially assistive robots in geriatric care settings hinges on the attitudes and opinions of healthcare professionals. This study explored their needs, expectations, and perceptions regarding robot use, including facilitating factors and barriers to implementation.

Methods: Twenty professionals participated in semi-structured interviews that covered topics such as robot applications, perceived value, acceptance criteria, prerequisites for deployment, ethical considerations, and design attributes. These interviews were analyzed using a deductive qualitative approach guided by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment model (version 3.0).

Results: Results indicated that professionals generally viewed robots favorably, noting their usefulness in various non-intimate tasks like meal assistance and toileting. Ease of use was identified as a critical factor for robot adoption in geriatric care. Furthermore, the necessity of educating all stakeholders and providing comprehensive training to professionals emerged as essential for successful implementation. The discussions also included financial and ethical issues related to the introduction of these technologies.

Conclusion: These findings will contribute to develop guidelines for designing and deploying socially assistive robots that align with the preferences and requirements of geriatric care professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在老年护理机构实施社交辅助机器人:医护专业人员的观点以及促进因素和障碍的识别。
前言社交辅助机器人能否成功融入老年护理环境取决于医护人员的态度和观点。本研究探讨了他们对机器人使用的需求、期望和看法,包括实施的促进因素和障碍:20名专业人员参加了半结构式访谈,访谈内容包括机器人应用、感知价值、接受标准、部署前提、伦理考虑和设计属性等。在欧洲卫生技术评估网络模型(3.0 版)的指导下,采用演绎定性方法对这些访谈进行了分析:结果表明,专业人士普遍看好机器人,并指出其在各种非亲密任务(如协助进餐和如厕)中的实用性。易用性被认为是在老年护理中采用机器人的关键因素。此外,有必要对所有利益相关者进行教育,并为专业人员提供全面培训,这对成功实施机器人至关重要。讨论还包括与引进这些技术相关的财务和伦理问题:这些发现将有助于为设计和部署符合老年护理专业人员偏好和要求的社会辅助机器人制定指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence approach for detecting and classifying abnormal behaviour in older adults using wearable sensors. Designing feelings into lower-limb prostheses - A kansei engineering approach to understand lower-limb prosthetic cosmeses. Public opinion on types of voice systems for older adults. Initial feasibility evaluation of the RISES system: An innovative and activity-based closed-loop framework for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and recovery. Inclusive rehabilitation and assistive technologies development: An exploration of considerations, principles, and stakeholder engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1