Tobias Goihl, David F Rusaw, Karin Roeleveld, Siri Merete Brændvik
{"title":"Provision of ankle foot orthoses for children with cerebral palsy in Norway.","authors":"Tobias Goihl, David F Rusaw, Karin Roeleveld, Siri Merete Brændvik","doi":"10.1177/20556683241276804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Practice of ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) provision for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy is underreported and the literature is not consistent on choice of AFO-design. This study describes clinical practice of AFO provision for children with cerebral palsy and evaluates how clinical practice aligns with existing recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted, inviting all Norwegian orthotists working with children with cerebral palsy. Orthotic practice was investigated using a self-reported survey design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From all eligible orthotists, 54% responded, revealing that AFO provision involves patients, physicians, and physiotherapists at different stages. Patient preference directly influenced the ultimate AFO-design. Shank vertical angle was evaluated by 79%. For children with crouch gait and those with short gastrocnemius, a majority preferred a combination of rigid and articulated/flexible AFO-designs. Instrumented gait analysis was conducted by 51% at AFO delivery stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings show that AFO provision in Norway is collaborative, involving clinical team members and consideration of patient preferences. A discrepancy between clinical practice and existing recommendations for children with crouch gait and those with short gastrocnemius is observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683241276804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Practice of ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) provision for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy is underreported and the literature is not consistent on choice of AFO-design. This study describes clinical practice of AFO provision for children with cerebral palsy and evaluates how clinical practice aligns with existing recommendations.
Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted, inviting all Norwegian orthotists working with children with cerebral palsy. Orthotic practice was investigated using a self-reported survey design.
Results: From all eligible orthotists, 54% responded, revealing that AFO provision involves patients, physicians, and physiotherapists at different stages. Patient preference directly influenced the ultimate AFO-design. Shank vertical angle was evaluated by 79%. For children with crouch gait and those with short gastrocnemius, a majority preferred a combination of rigid and articulated/flexible AFO-designs. Instrumented gait analysis was conducted by 51% at AFO delivery stage.
Conclusions: The findings show that AFO provision in Norway is collaborative, involving clinical team members and consideration of patient preferences. A discrepancy between clinical practice and existing recommendations for children with crouch gait and those with short gastrocnemius is observed.
导言:有关为行动不便的脑瘫儿童提供踝足矫形器(AFO)的实践报道不足,而且有关选择AFO设计的文献也不一致。本研究描述了为脑瘫儿童提供踝足矫形器的临床实践,并评估了临床实践与现有建议的一致性:方法:进行了一项在线横断面调查,邀请挪威所有从事脑瘫儿童矫形工作的矫形师参加。结果:在所有符合条件的矫形师中,有54名矫形师参加了调查:结果:在所有符合条件的矫形师中,54%的矫形师做出了回复,这表明AFO的提供涉及患者、医生和物理治疗师的不同阶段。患者的偏好直接影响了最终的 AFO 设计。79%的人对鞋柄垂直角度进行了评估。对于蹲踞式步态和腓肠肌短小的儿童,大多数人倾向于将刚性和铰接式/柔性AFO设计相结合。51%的儿童在AFO交付阶段进行了仪器步态分析:研究结果表明,在挪威,AFO的提供是合作性的,涉及临床团队成员并考虑到患者的偏好。临床实践与针对蹲踞步态儿童和腓肠肌短小儿童的现有建议之间存在差异。