Mobile phone interventions to improve health outcomes among patients with chronic diseases: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis from 34 meta-analyses

IF 23.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Lancet Digital Health Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00119-5
Shufang Sun PhD , Otto Simonsson PhD , Prof Stephen McGarvey PhD , John Torous MD , Simon B Goldberg PhD
{"title":"Mobile phone interventions to improve health outcomes among patients with chronic diseases: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis from 34 meta-analyses","authors":"Shufang Sun PhD ,&nbsp;Otto Simonsson PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Stephen McGarvey PhD ,&nbsp;John Torous MD ,&nbsp;Simon B Goldberg PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00119-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This umbrella review of 34 meta-analyses, representing 235 randomised controlled trials done across 52 countries and 48 957 participants and ten chronic conditions, aimed to evaluate evidence on the efficacy of mobile phone interventions for populations with chronic diseases. We evaluated the strengths of evidence via the Fusar-Poli and Radua methodology. Compared with usual care, mobile apps had convincing effects on glycated haemoglobin reduction among adults with type 2 diabetes (d=0·44). Highly suggestive effects were found for both text messages and apps on various outcomes, including medication adherence (among patients with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa and people with cardiovascular disease), glucose management in type 2 diabetes, and blood pressure reduction in hypertension. Many effects (42%) were non-significant. Various gaps were identified, such as a scarcity of reporting on moderators and publication bias by meta-analyses, little research in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, and little reporting on adverse events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":"6 11","pages":"Pages e857-e870"},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024001195","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This umbrella review of 34 meta-analyses, representing 235 randomised controlled trials done across 52 countries and 48 957 participants and ten chronic conditions, aimed to evaluate evidence on the efficacy of mobile phone interventions for populations with chronic diseases. We evaluated the strengths of evidence via the Fusar-Poli and Radua methodology. Compared with usual care, mobile apps had convincing effects on glycated haemoglobin reduction among adults with type 2 diabetes (d=0·44). Highly suggestive effects were found for both text messages and apps on various outcomes, including medication adherence (among patients with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa and people with cardiovascular disease), glucose management in type 2 diabetes, and blood pressure reduction in hypertension. Many effects (42%) were non-significant. Various gaps were identified, such as a scarcity of reporting on moderators and publication bias by meta-analyses, little research in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, and little reporting on adverse events.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善慢性病患者健康状况的手机干预措施:34 项元分析的总综述和证据综述。
本综述包括 34 项荟萃分析,涉及 52 个国家的 235 项随机对照试验、48 957 名参与者和 10 种慢性病,旨在评估手机干预对慢性病患者的疗效。我们通过 Fusar-Poli 和 Radua 方法评估了证据的优势。与常规护理相比,手机应用对降低成人 2 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白具有令人信服的效果(d=0-44)。短信和应用程序对各种结果都有高度提示性效果,包括坚持用药(撒哈拉以南非洲的艾滋病毒感染者和心血管疾病患者)、2 型糖尿病患者的血糖管理和高血压患者的血压降低。许多效果(42%)并不显著。研究还发现了许多不足之处,如缺乏关于调节因素和荟萃分析发表偏差的报告,对低收入和中低收入国家的研究很少,对不良事件的报告也很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Digital Health publishes important, innovative, and practice-changing research on any topic connected with digital technology in clinical medicine, public health, and global health. The journal’s open access content crosses subject boundaries, building bridges between health professionals and researchers.By bringing together the most important advances in this multidisciplinary field,The Lancet Digital Health is the most prominent publishing venue in digital health. We publish a range of content types including Articles,Review, Comment, and Correspondence, contributing to promoting digital technologies in health practice worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The urgent need to accelerate synthetic data privacy frameworks for medical research From the 100 Day Mission to 100 lines of software development: how to improve early outbreak analytics Prediction of emergency admissions: trade-offs between model simplicity and performance AI for medical diagnosis: does a single negative trial mean it is ineffective? Artificial intelligence-guided detection of under-recognised cardiomyopathies on point-of-care cardiac ultrasonography: a multicentre study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1