“We do these audits, but in the end, it’s useless.” How can facility-based maternal death reviews improve the quality of care in Benin?

Christelle Boyi Hounsou , Jean-Paul Dossou , Thérèse Delvaux , Lenka Benova , Edgard-Marius Ouendo , Sorel Lokossou , Marjolein Zweekhorst , Bruno Marchal
{"title":"“We do these audits, but in the end, it’s useless.” How can facility-based maternal death reviews improve the quality of care in Benin?","authors":"Christelle Boyi Hounsou ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Dossou ,&nbsp;Thérèse Delvaux ,&nbsp;Lenka Benova ,&nbsp;Edgard-Marius Ouendo ,&nbsp;Sorel Lokossou ,&nbsp;Marjolein Zweekhorst ,&nbsp;Bruno Marchal","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Benin scaled up facility-based Maternal Death Reviewss (MDRs) in 2013 to address its high maternal mortality rate. This study aims to assess the extent to which facilitybased MDR captured the complex causes of maternal deaths in 2022. In this mixedmethod study, we first conducted a quantitative analysis of dysfunctions, root causes,and recommendations extracted from all facility-based MDR reports that occurred in Benin's health facilities in 2022. We calculated frequency distributions based on the systemic maternal care quality assessment framework's components and the iceberg model for system thinking's layers. Second, we conducted in-depth and informal interviews and (non)participant observations and reviewed facility-based MDR policyrelated documents. Content analysis was applied to qualitative data. facility-based MDR teams identified 1295 dysfunctions, 1216 root causes, and 1082 recommendations in facility-based MDR reports of 540 maternal deaths. One-fifth of reports were uninformative, lacking dysfunctions, root causes, or recommendations.Within the health system components, leadership and governance received the least attention regarding dysfunctions (1 %) and root causes (12 %).Most dysfunctions (87 %) and root causes (73 %) focused on the iceberg's tip, leading to reactive recommendations rather than addressing deeper systemic issues. Two main factors emerged: non-compliance with facility-based MDR requirements (time constraints, unreliable data, fear of strained provider relationships) and limitations in facility-based MDR processes (data collection and analysis tool constraints),</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856224000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Benin scaled up facility-based Maternal Death Reviewss (MDRs) in 2013 to address its high maternal mortality rate. This study aims to assess the extent to which facilitybased MDR captured the complex causes of maternal deaths in 2022. In this mixedmethod study, we first conducted a quantitative analysis of dysfunctions, root causes,and recommendations extracted from all facility-based MDR reports that occurred in Benin's health facilities in 2022. We calculated frequency distributions based on the systemic maternal care quality assessment framework's components and the iceberg model for system thinking's layers. Second, we conducted in-depth and informal interviews and (non)participant observations and reviewed facility-based MDR policyrelated documents. Content analysis was applied to qualitative data. facility-based MDR teams identified 1295 dysfunctions, 1216 root causes, and 1082 recommendations in facility-based MDR reports of 540 maternal deaths. One-fifth of reports were uninformative, lacking dysfunctions, root causes, or recommendations.Within the health system components, leadership and governance received the least attention regarding dysfunctions (1 %) and root causes (12 %).Most dysfunctions (87 %) and root causes (73 %) focused on the iceberg's tip, leading to reactive recommendations rather than addressing deeper systemic issues. Two main factors emerged: non-compliance with facility-based MDR requirements (time constraints, unreliable data, fear of strained provider relationships) and limitations in facility-based MDR processes (data collection and analysis tool constraints),
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我们做了这些审核,但最终都是无用功"。以医疗机构为基础的孕产妇死亡评审如何提高贝宁的医疗质量?
贝宁于2013年扩大了基于设施的孕产妇死亡审查(MDRs),以解决孕产妇死亡率高的问题。本研究旨在评估以医疗机构为基础的孕产妇死亡评审在多大程度上反映了 2022 年孕产妇死亡的复杂原因。在这项混合方法研究中,我们首先对 2022 年发生在贝宁医疗机构的所有基于医疗机构的 MDR 报告中提取的功能障碍、根本原因和建议进行了定量分析。我们根据系统性孕产妇护理质量评估框架的组成部分和系统思维冰山模型的层级计算了频率分布。其次,我们进行了深入的非正式访谈和(非)参与者观察,并查阅了基于医疗机构的 MDR 政策相关文件。我们对定性数据进行了内容分析。在针对 540 例孕产妇死亡的医疗机构孕产妇死亡报告中,医疗机构孕产妇死亡报告团队发现了 1295 项功能障碍、1216 项根本原因和 1082 项建议。大多数功能障碍(87%)和根本原因(73%)都集中在冰山一角,导致了被动的建议,而不是解决更深层次的系统性问题。出现了两个主要因素:不遵守基于设施的 MDR 要求(时间限制、数据不可靠、担心提供者关系紧张)和基于设施的 MDR 流程的限制(数据收集和分析工具限制)、
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is mother's education essential to improving the nutritional status of children under five in Côte d′Ivoire? “I am the bridge”: Examining intersectoral collaboration among community health workers to address maternal and child health in the Philippines Supports and barriers to creating and implementing person-centred plans in the community care sector in Canada: A qualitative analysis of three perspectives The role of universal health coverage in secondary prevention: A case study of Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme and early-onset hypertension How can health systems better prepare for the next pandemic? A qualitative study of lessons learned from the COVID-19 response in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1