Adjusting for quality of care in primary health care utilization and benefits in Bihar, India: A benefit incidence analysis

Akriti Mehta , Bryan N. Patenaude, Krishna D. Rao
{"title":"Adjusting for quality of care in primary health care utilization and benefits in Bihar, India: A benefit incidence analysis","authors":"Akriti Mehta ,&nbsp;Bryan N. Patenaude,&nbsp;Krishna D. Rao","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>India’s public health policies prioritize the least wealthy and vulnerable. Additionally, for Primary Health Care (PHC) to achieve equitable health outcomes, all must receive high-quality care. This study determined equality of utilization and benefit incidence of PHC services across socioeconomic (SE) groups in Bihar, with and without adjusting for quality of care. It used secondary data from linked PHC facility and household surveys in Bihar that included information on PHC facility utilization, quality of care and household expenditure patterns. Lorenz curves and concentration indices were constructed to examine relative distribution of utilization and benefits from public sector PHC services by SE status, before and after adjusting for quality of care using quality weights. We found that relative distribution of public sector PHC utilization, total and net benefits was statistically no different from perfect equality. With quality weights, utilization and benefits of PHC facilities in Bihar were slightly more pro-rich but statistically no different from perfect equality. The wealthiest do not disproportionately benefit from public sector PHC facilities, but neither do the least wealthy. In conclusion, relative utilization and benefits of public sector PHC facilities were equally distributed across socioeconomic groups in Bihar. Benefits from public sector PHC facilities are not disproportionately concentrated among the least wealthy in the community. As the Ayushman-Bharat Health and Wellness Centers are strengthened to improve public sector PHC services, it would be important to target its benefits towards the least wealthy by ensuring services are accessible and amenable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856224000266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India’s public health policies prioritize the least wealthy and vulnerable. Additionally, for Primary Health Care (PHC) to achieve equitable health outcomes, all must receive high-quality care. This study determined equality of utilization and benefit incidence of PHC services across socioeconomic (SE) groups in Bihar, with and without adjusting for quality of care. It used secondary data from linked PHC facility and household surveys in Bihar that included information on PHC facility utilization, quality of care and household expenditure patterns. Lorenz curves and concentration indices were constructed to examine relative distribution of utilization and benefits from public sector PHC services by SE status, before and after adjusting for quality of care using quality weights. We found that relative distribution of public sector PHC utilization, total and net benefits was statistically no different from perfect equality. With quality weights, utilization and benefits of PHC facilities in Bihar were slightly more pro-rich but statistically no different from perfect equality. The wealthiest do not disproportionately benefit from public sector PHC facilities, but neither do the least wealthy. In conclusion, relative utilization and benefits of public sector PHC facilities were equally distributed across socioeconomic groups in Bihar. Benefits from public sector PHC facilities are not disproportionately concentrated among the least wealthy in the community. As the Ayushman-Bharat Health and Wellness Centers are strengthened to improve public sector PHC services, it would be important to target its benefits towards the least wealthy by ensuring services are accessible and amenable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整印度比哈尔邦初级保健利用率和收益中的保健质量:受益发生率分析
印度的公共卫生政策优先考虑最不富裕的弱势群体。此外,要使初级卫生保健(PHC)取得公平的卫生成果,所有人都必须获得高质量的医疗服务。本研究确定了比哈尔邦不同社会经济(SE)群体在使用初级保健服务和受益发生率方面的平等性,并对保健质量进行了调整和未进行调整。研究使用了比哈尔邦相关初级保健设施和家庭调查的二手数据,其中包括初级保健设施利用率、保健质量和家庭支出模式等信息。在使用质量权重对医疗质量进行调整之前和之后,我们构建了洛伦兹曲线和集中指数,以研究公共部门初级保健服务利用率和收益在社会经济地位方面的相对分布情况。我们发现,公共部门初级保健服务的利用率、总收益和净收益的相对分布在统计上与完全平等没有区别。使用质量权重后,比哈尔邦初级保健设施的利用率和收益略微偏向富人,但在统计上与完全平等无异。最富有的人并没有从公共部门的初级保健设施中过多受益,但最不富有的人也没有。总之,比哈尔邦各社会经济群体对公共部门初级保健设施的相对利用率和受益程度相当。公共部门初级保健设施的惠益并没有不成比例地集中于社区中最不富裕的人群。随着 Ayushman-Bharat 保健和健康中心得到加强,公共部门初级保健服务也将得到改善,重要的是通过确保服务的可及性和便利性,使其惠及最不富裕人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the functioning of front-line health services in the Kati health district in Mali, West Africa: A qualitative study Identifying the active ingredients in payment for performance programmes using system dynamics modelling Assessing challenges and solutions in substance abuse prevention, harm reduction, and treatment services in New York State Evaluating access during change: A qualitative exploration of access impacts to Canadian primary care rehabilitation providers during the COVID-19 pandemic Ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to primary care among im/migrant communities in British Columbia, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1