Traditional finance, digital finance, and financial efficiency: An empirical analysis based on 19 urban agglomerations in China

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103603
{"title":"Traditional finance, digital finance, and financial efficiency: An empirical analysis based on 19 urban agglomerations in China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the emergence of the digital economy era, enhancing financial efficiency through the complementary effect of digital and traditional finance has increasingly become a focal point in the financial industry. This paper focuses on 19 urban agglomerations in China to investigate whether digital finance and traditional finance have complementary effect on improving financial efficiency. It explores the mechanisms behind this complementary effect, examines whether financial efficiency can continue to improve once digital finance reaches a critical scale, and investigates whether economic development moderates the impact of digital finance on financial efficiency. The findings reveal that digital finance contributes positively to enhancing financial efficiency, and that there exists a complementary effect between digital finance and traditional finance in this regard. These conclusions remain robust even after conducting various stability tests and addressing endogeneity issues. Mechanism testing demonstrated that this complementary effect arises from improvements of transactional efficiency and marketization level. Further analysis reveals that, while digital finance significantly enhances financial efficiency up to a critical scale, this effect diminishes beyond that threshold. Moreover, in areas with high-level financial development, economic development has a positive moderating effect on the impact of digital finance on financial efficiency, whereas in areas with low-level financial development, such a moderating effect is not robust.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005350","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the emergence of the digital economy era, enhancing financial efficiency through the complementary effect of digital and traditional finance has increasingly become a focal point in the financial industry. This paper focuses on 19 urban agglomerations in China to investigate whether digital finance and traditional finance have complementary effect on improving financial efficiency. It explores the mechanisms behind this complementary effect, examines whether financial efficiency can continue to improve once digital finance reaches a critical scale, and investigates whether economic development moderates the impact of digital finance on financial efficiency. The findings reveal that digital finance contributes positively to enhancing financial efficiency, and that there exists a complementary effect between digital finance and traditional finance in this regard. These conclusions remain robust even after conducting various stability tests and addressing endogeneity issues. Mechanism testing demonstrated that this complementary effect arises from improvements of transactional efficiency and marketization level. Further analysis reveals that, while digital finance significantly enhances financial efficiency up to a critical scale, this effect diminishes beyond that threshold. Moreover, in areas with high-level financial development, economic development has a positive moderating effect on the impact of digital finance on financial efficiency, whereas in areas with low-level financial development, such a moderating effect is not robust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统金融、数字金融与金融效率:基于中国 19 个城市群的实证分析
随着数字经济时代的到来,通过数字金融与传统金融的互补效应提升金融效率日益成为金融业关注的焦点。本文以中国 19 个城市群为研究对象,探讨数字金融与传统金融在提高金融效率方面是否具有互补效应。本文探讨了这种互补效应背后的机制,研究了数字金融达到临界规模后金融效率能否继续提高,并研究了经济发展是否会调节数字金融对金融效率的影响。研究结果表明,数字金融对提高金融效率有积极的促进作用,数字金融与传统金融在这方面存在互补效应。即使在进行了各种稳定性检验并解决了内生性问题后,这些结论依然稳健。机制测试表明,这种互补效应源于交易效率和市场化水平的提高。进一步的分析表明,虽然数字金融能在临界规模内显著提高金融效率,但超过这一临界值后,这种效应就会减弱。此外,在金融发展水平较高的地区,经济发展对数字金融对金融效率的影响具有积极的调节作用,而在金融发展水平较低的地区,这种调节作用并不稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Strategic tone management in ESG reports and ESG risk Investigating investor attention to carbon risk from a supply chain perspective Does social responsibility reform curb corporate greenwashing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China Fee structure and equity fund manager’s optimal locking in profits strategy Beyond the balance sheet: Assessing corporate governance through the Lens of debtholders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1