Multi-Institutional Standardized Dosimetry Protocol for Preclinical Radiobiological Experiments

{"title":"Multi-Institutional Standardized Dosimetry Protocol for Preclinical Radiobiological Experiments","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Commercial devices capable of delivering FLASH radiotherapy are being introduced into radiobiology research. There is a critical necessity for a unified dosimetric protocol to ensure dosimetric consistency across institutes. This work introduces a collaborative, multi-institutional dosimetry protocol designed to validate and standardize dosimetry across two research facilities using FLASH intraoperative systems.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>Two independent institutes used the same collimator design (4x4 cm<sup>2</sup>) and same beam parameters to deliver 12 or 14 Gy with FLASH or conventional (CONV) dose rates. For dosimetry, replicates of a realistic anatomy 3D-printed mouse phantom with coronal or sagittal division allowing insertions of radiochromic films, and a set of films (sourced from a singular source) were sent from Institute 1 to Institute 2. The institutes independently calibrated the target doses for FLASH using films from the phantom against the associated measurements from the embedded toroid of the system, and for CONV against the total number of MU. Ultimately, 80 experimental toroid measurements for FLASH (40 per target dose) were acquired in 4 days, with 5 set of films per modality per day of measurement. The films were returned to Institute 1 for analysis and the experimental values for FLASH and CONV were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For 12 Gy target dose, the toroid-derived FLASH doses combined for Institute 1 vs Institute 2 were 11.85 ± 0.11 Gy vs 12.32 ± 0.16 Gy, for 14 Gy were 14.12 ± 0.07 Gy vs 14.09 ± 0.01 Gy. for CONV 11.74 ± 0.23 Gy vs 12.19 ± 0.20 Gy and for 14 Gy were 13.86 ± 0.21 Gy vs 14.47 ± 0.31 Gy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The differences between measured and target doses, as well as between FLASH and CONV doses, were within 3%, and the inter-institutional dose differences were under 5%. Enhancing the protocol could entail incorporating an extra calibration step before the experimental dates to fine tune dose alignment between institutions. The success of the collaborative, multi-institutional dosimetry protocol, using realistic anatomy 3D-printed mouse phantom, is evidenced by the demonstrated consistency in preclinical radiobiological experiments across distinct research facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624007843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s)

Commercial devices capable of delivering FLASH radiotherapy are being introduced into radiobiology research. There is a critical necessity for a unified dosimetric protocol to ensure dosimetric consistency across institutes. This work introduces a collaborative, multi-institutional dosimetry protocol designed to validate and standardize dosimetry across two research facilities using FLASH intraoperative systems.

Materials/Methods

Two independent institutes used the same collimator design (4x4 cm2) and same beam parameters to deliver 12 or 14 Gy with FLASH or conventional (CONV) dose rates. For dosimetry, replicates of a realistic anatomy 3D-printed mouse phantom with coronal or sagittal division allowing insertions of radiochromic films, and a set of films (sourced from a singular source) were sent from Institute 1 to Institute 2. The institutes independently calibrated the target doses for FLASH using films from the phantom against the associated measurements from the embedded toroid of the system, and for CONV against the total number of MU. Ultimately, 80 experimental toroid measurements for FLASH (40 per target dose) were acquired in 4 days, with 5 set of films per modality per day of measurement. The films were returned to Institute 1 for analysis and the experimental values for FLASH and CONV were calculated.

Results

For 12 Gy target dose, the toroid-derived FLASH doses combined for Institute 1 vs Institute 2 were 11.85 ± 0.11 Gy vs 12.32 ± 0.16 Gy, for 14 Gy were 14.12 ± 0.07 Gy vs 14.09 ± 0.01 Gy. for CONV 11.74 ± 0.23 Gy vs 12.19 ± 0.20 Gy and for 14 Gy were 13.86 ± 0.21 Gy vs 14.47 ± 0.31 Gy.

Conclusion

The differences between measured and target doses, as well as between FLASH and CONV doses, were within 3%, and the inter-institutional dose differences were under 5%. Enhancing the protocol could entail incorporating an extra calibration step before the experimental dates to fine tune dose alignment between institutions. The success of the collaborative, multi-institutional dosimetry protocol, using realistic anatomy 3D-printed mouse phantom, is evidenced by the demonstrated consistency in preclinical radiobiological experiments across distinct research facilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床前放射生物学实验的多机构标准化剂量测定规程
目的/目标:放射生物学研究正在引入能够进行闪烁放射治疗的商用设备。为确保各研究机构剂量测定的一致性,亟需制定统一的剂量测定方案。材料/方法两个独立的研究机构使用相同的准直器设计(4x4 cm2)和相同的射束参数,以 FLASH 或传统(CONV)剂量率提供 12 或 14 Gy 的剂量。为了进行剂量测定,第一研究所向第二研究所提供了一个现实解剖3D打印小鼠模型的复制品,该模型具有冠状或矢状分割,可插入放射性变色胶片,并提供了一组胶片(来自单一来源)。各研究所根据系统嵌入式环形结构的相关测量结果,使用来自模型的胶片独立校准了 FLASH 的目标剂量,并根据 MU 的总数校准了 CONV 的目标剂量。最终,在 4 天内获得了 80 个 FLASH 实验环形测量值(每个目标剂量 40 个),每个模式每天测量 5 套胶片。结果对于 12 Gy 目标剂量,研究所 1 与研究所 2 的环形所得 FLASH 剂量总和为 11.85 ± 0.11 Gy vs 12.32 ± 0.16 Gy;对于 14 Gy 目标剂量,环形所得 FLASH 剂量总和为 14.12 ± 0.07 Gy vs 14.09 ± 0.01 Gy;对于 14 Gy 目标剂量,环形所得 FLASH 剂量总和为 11.85 ± 0.11 Gy vs 12.32 ± 0.16 Gy。结论测量剂量和目标剂量之间以及FLASH和CONV剂量之间的差异均在3%以内,机构间剂量差异低于5%。为改进该方案,可在实验日期前增加一个校准步骤,以微调机构间的剂量一致性。临床前放射生物学实验在不同的研究机构之间表现出的一致性,证明了使用真实解剖3D打印小鼠模型的多机构剂量测定合作协议的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Trial of Image-Guided, Risk-Volume-Adapted Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy. ORAI2 is Important for the Development of Early-Stage Post-Irradiation Fibrosis in Salivary Glands. Safety Profile of Durvalumab (D) as Consolidation Treatment (tx) in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC) in ADRIATIC: Focus on Pneumonitis and Immune-Mediated Adverse Events (imAEs) Contralateral Neck Recurrence Rates in Head and Neck Carcinomas after Primary Surgery, Bilateral Neck Dissection, a Pathologically Negative Contralateral Neck, and Adjuvant Ipsilateral Neck Radiation Phase II Trial of Proton Re-Irradiation+/-Chemotherapy in Previously Irradiated Recurrent Head/Neck Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1