Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury: A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial

{"title":"Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury: A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3><div>Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) can reduce survival time and lowering the quality of life of patients. However, the current standard therapy does not target its pathophysiologic process. Pirfenidone is indicated for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and our experiments have shown that it ameliorates alveolar inflammation and fibrosis in mice after radiation, and its mechanism of action is similar to the pathophysiological process of RILI. Therefore, the aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in combination with standard therapy versus standard therapy alone for the treatment of grade 2 or 3 RILI.</div></div><div><h3>Materials/Methods</h3><div>This randomized, controlled, open-label phase II clinical trial enrolled patients diagnosed with grade 2 or 3 RILI at 10 centers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the pirfenidone group (pirfenidone plus standard therapy) and the control group (standard therapy). They were followed up once each at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 after randomization. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in DLCO% at week 24. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in FVC%, FEV1%, CT score, symptom score, RILI classification score and acute pulmonary exacerbation free survival at week 24. Exploratory endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Repeated-measures data were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model. This was an exploratory trial and did not adjust alpha for multiple comparisons, so alpha was set to 0.05 (two-sided) for all endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 134 patients were enrolled, with 121 completing follow-up by February 16, 2024, there were 60 randomized to the pirfenidone group and 61 to the control group. Compared with the control group, the adjusted least squares mean changes from baseline to week 24 in DLCO%, FVC%, and FEV1% in the pirfenidone group increased by 10.6%, 9.4%, and 6.8%, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.002, <em>P</em> = 0.004, and <em>P</em> = 0.051), and the proportion of improvement in CT ground-glass, reticulation, and honeycombing scores at week 24 compared to baseline increased by 28.0%, 50.8%, and 7.6%, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.030, <em>P</em> = 0.002, and <em>P</em> = 0.358), and the 24-week survival rate without acute pulmonary exacerbation increased by 20.1% (<em>P</em> = 0.026). Cough, fever, dyspnea, radiation pneumonitis, and radiation pulmonary fibrosis scores at week 24 were not statistically different between the two groups, nor were PFS and OS (<em>P</em> = 0.056, <em>P</em> = 0.932, <em>P</em> = 0.897, <em>P</em> = 0.076, <em>P</em> = 0.152, <em>P</em> = 0.339, and <em>P</em> = 0.345). The incidence of grade 3, 4, and 5 adverse events was similar in the pirfenidone and control groups (11.7% vs 11.5%, 1.7% vs 3.3%, and 8.3% vs 6.6%), and no pirfenidone related grade ≥ 4 adverse events were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pirfenidone can significantly improve lung function, mild to moderate radiation pulmonary fibrosis, and acute pulmonary exacerbation free survival in patients with RILI compared with the control group, and its side effects are acceptable. Further study is required for the use of pirfenidone for the treatment of RILI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624007685","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s)

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) can reduce survival time and lowering the quality of life of patients. However, the current standard therapy does not target its pathophysiologic process. Pirfenidone is indicated for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and our experiments have shown that it ameliorates alveolar inflammation and fibrosis in mice after radiation, and its mechanism of action is similar to the pathophysiological process of RILI. Therefore, the aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in combination with standard therapy versus standard therapy alone for the treatment of grade 2 or 3 RILI.

Materials/Methods

This randomized, controlled, open-label phase II clinical trial enrolled patients diagnosed with grade 2 or 3 RILI at 10 centers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the pirfenidone group (pirfenidone plus standard therapy) and the control group (standard therapy). They were followed up once each at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 after randomization. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in DLCO% at week 24. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in FVC%, FEV1%, CT score, symptom score, RILI classification score and acute pulmonary exacerbation free survival at week 24. Exploratory endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Repeated-measures data were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model. This was an exploratory trial and did not adjust alpha for multiple comparisons, so alpha was set to 0.05 (two-sided) for all endpoints.

Results

A total of 134 patients were enrolled, with 121 completing follow-up by February 16, 2024, there were 60 randomized to the pirfenidone group and 61 to the control group. Compared with the control group, the adjusted least squares mean changes from baseline to week 24 in DLCO%, FVC%, and FEV1% in the pirfenidone group increased by 10.6%, 9.4%, and 6.8%, respectively (P = 0.002, P = 0.004, and P = 0.051), and the proportion of improvement in CT ground-glass, reticulation, and honeycombing scores at week 24 compared to baseline increased by 28.0%, 50.8%, and 7.6%, respectively (P = 0.030, P = 0.002, and P = 0.358), and the 24-week survival rate without acute pulmonary exacerbation increased by 20.1% (P = 0.026). Cough, fever, dyspnea, radiation pneumonitis, and radiation pulmonary fibrosis scores at week 24 were not statistically different between the two groups, nor were PFS and OS (P = 0.056, P = 0.932, P = 0.897, P = 0.076, P = 0.152, P = 0.339, and P = 0.345). The incidence of grade 3, 4, and 5 adverse events was similar in the pirfenidone and control groups (11.7% vs 11.5%, 1.7% vs 3.3%, and 8.3% vs 6.6%), and no pirfenidone related grade ≥ 4 adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

Pirfenidone can significantly improve lung function, mild to moderate radiation pulmonary fibrosis, and acute pulmonary exacerbation free survival in patients with RILI compared with the control group, and its side effects are acceptable. Further study is required for the use of pirfenidone for the treatment of RILI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗辐射所致肺损伤的吡非尼酮:多中心随机对照临床试验
目的/宗旨:辐射诱导的肺损伤(RILI)会缩短患者的生存时间并降低其生活质量。然而,目前的标准疗法并不针对其病理生理过程。吡非尼酮适用于特发性肺纤维化,我们的实验表明它能改善辐射后小鼠肺泡炎症和纤维化,其作用机制与 RILI 的病理生理过程相似。因此,本试验旨在研究吡非尼酮联合标准疗法与单独标准疗法治疗 2 级或 3 级 RILI 的疗效和安全性。材料/方法这项随机对照、开放标签的 II 期临床试验招募了 10 个中心的 2 级或 3 级 RILI 患者,按 1:1 的比例随机分配到吡非尼酮组(吡非尼酮加标准疗法)和对照组(标准疗法)。在随机分配后的第 4、8、16 和 24 周各随访一次。主要终点是第 24 周时 DLCO% 与基线相比的变化。次要终点是第24周时FVC%、FEV1%、CT评分、症状评分、RILI分类评分和无急性肺部恶化存活率与基线相比的变化。探索性终点为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。重复测量数据采用线性混合效应模型进行分析。本试验为探索性试验,未对α进行多重比较调整,因此所有终点的α均设为0.05(双侧)。结果共有134名患者入组,其中121人在2024年2月16日前完成了随访,60人随机分配到吡非尼酮组,61人分配到对照组。与对照组相比,从基线到第 24 周,吡非尼酮组 DLCO%、FVC% 和 FEV1% 的调整最小二乘法平均值变化分别增加了 10.6%、9.4% 和 6.8%(P = 0.002、P = 0.004 和 P = 0.051)。051),第24周时CT磨玻璃、网状结构和蜂窝状评分改善的比例与基线相比分别增加了28.0%、50.8%和7.6%(P = 0.030、P = 0.002和P = 0.358),无急性肺部恶化的24周生存率增加了20.1%(P = 0.026)。两组患者在第24周时的咳嗽、发热、呼吸困难、放射性肺炎和放射性肺纤维化评分无统计学差异,PFS和OS也无统计学差异(P = 0.056、P = 0.932、P = 0.897、P = 0.076、P = 0.152、P = 0.339和P = 0.345)。吡非尼酮组和对照组的 3、4、5 级不良事件发生率相似(11.7% vs 11.5%、1.7% vs 3.3%、8.3% vs 6.6%),未观察到与吡非尼酮相关的≥4 级不良事件。使用吡非尼酮治疗 RILI 还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Trial of Image-Guided, Risk-Volume-Adapted Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy. ORAI2 is Important for the Development of Early-Stage Post-Irradiation Fibrosis in Salivary Glands. Safety Profile of Durvalumab (D) as Consolidation Treatment (tx) in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC) in ADRIATIC: Focus on Pneumonitis and Immune-Mediated Adverse Events (imAEs) Contralateral Neck Recurrence Rates in Head and Neck Carcinomas after Primary Surgery, Bilateral Neck Dissection, a Pathologically Negative Contralateral Neck, and Adjuvant Ipsilateral Neck Radiation Phase II Trial of Proton Re-Irradiation+/-Chemotherapy in Previously Irradiated Recurrent Head/Neck Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1