Home-Made Lateral Flow Test Strip Versus POC-CCA Assay for Detection of Active Schistosomiasis in Egypt.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY Acta Parasitologica Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s11686-024-00917-9
Manal Kamel, Faten Salah, Zeinab Demerdash, Sara Maher, Hanan El-Baz, Nahla Zakaria, Rania Abu-Shady, Amany Saad, Salwa Hassan, Doaa Abdel Aziz
{"title":"Home-Made Lateral Flow Test Strip Versus POC-CCA Assay for Detection of Active Schistosomiasis in Egypt.","authors":"Manal Kamel, Faten Salah, Zeinab Demerdash, Sara Maher, Hanan El-Baz, Nahla Zakaria, Rania Abu-Shady, Amany Saad, Salwa Hassan, Doaa Abdel Aziz","doi":"10.1007/s11686-024-00917-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For years, the Kato-Katz (KK) technique has been considered the gold standard for diagnosing schistosomiasis. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of our previously developed gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow test strip (AuNPs-LFTS) for diagnosing active Schistosoma mansoni with that of the commercially available point-of-care Circulating Cathodic Antigen detection (POC-CCA) kit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we collected sixty positive and twenty negative urine samples from patients in endemic hot spots in the Nile Delta, as well as from patients visiting the internal medicine clinic at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI). We produced monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against S. mansoni soluble egg antigen (SEA) from cloned hybridoma cells (4D/1D). These MAbs were conjugated with gold and mesoporous silica nanoparticles, and used to develop the LFTS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LFTS demonstrated a limit of detection (LoD) of 3 ng/ml. The sensitivity and specificity of the developed LFTS were found to be 96.7% and 95%, respectively, compared to 85% and 90% for the POC-CCA detection kit. The cases were divided into groups based on egg count in the stool, categorized as light, moderate, and heavy infections. The sensitivity of the LFTS in the group with light infection was higher than that of the POC-CCA. When using the KK technique (eggs per gram of stool sample [EPG]) as the reference test, the kappa value for the nano-based strips was 0.902, compared to 0.672 for the CCA strips, indicating an almost perfect agreement between KK and our developed LFTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results confirm the reliability and effectiveness of the LFTS compared to commercially available kits for rapid, sensitive, and early diagnosis of schistosomiasis. However, it is recommended to conduct further assessments of the developed strip on a larger scale with a broader range of cases before considering its introduction to local or international markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":6932,"journal":{"name":"Acta Parasitologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Parasitologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-024-00917-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For years, the Kato-Katz (KK) technique has been considered the gold standard for diagnosing schistosomiasis. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of our previously developed gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow test strip (AuNPs-LFTS) for diagnosing active Schistosoma mansoni with that of the commercially available point-of-care Circulating Cathodic Antigen detection (POC-CCA) kit.

Methods: In this study, we collected sixty positive and twenty negative urine samples from patients in endemic hot spots in the Nile Delta, as well as from patients visiting the internal medicine clinic at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI). We produced monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against S. mansoni soluble egg antigen (SEA) from cloned hybridoma cells (4D/1D). These MAbs were conjugated with gold and mesoporous silica nanoparticles, and used to develop the LFTS.

Results: The LFTS demonstrated a limit of detection (LoD) of 3 ng/ml. The sensitivity and specificity of the developed LFTS were found to be 96.7% and 95%, respectively, compared to 85% and 90% for the POC-CCA detection kit. The cases were divided into groups based on egg count in the stool, categorized as light, moderate, and heavy infections. The sensitivity of the LFTS in the group with light infection was higher than that of the POC-CCA. When using the KK technique (eggs per gram of stool sample [EPG]) as the reference test, the kappa value for the nano-based strips was 0.902, compared to 0.672 for the CCA strips, indicating an almost perfect agreement between KK and our developed LFTS.

Conclusion: These results confirm the reliability and effectiveness of the LFTS compared to commercially available kits for rapid, sensitive, and early diagnosis of schistosomiasis. However, it is recommended to conduct further assessments of the developed strip on a larger scale with a broader range of cases before considering its introduction to local or international markets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自制侧流试纸与 POC-CCA 检测埃及活动性血吸虫病的对比。
背景:多年来,Kato-Katz(KK)技术一直被认为是诊断血吸虫病的金标准。本研究的目的是比较我们之前开发的基于金纳米粒子的侧流试纸(AuNPs-LFTS)与市场上销售的护理点循环阴极抗原检测试剂盒(POC-CCA)在诊断活动性曼氏血吸虫方面的有效性:在这项研究中,我们从尼罗河三角洲流行病热点地区的患者以及到西奥多-比尔哈尔兹研究所(TBRI)内科诊所就诊的患者身上采集了 60 份阳性尿样和 20 份阴性尿样。我们从克隆杂交瘤细胞(4D/1D)中制备了针对曼森氏杆菌可溶性卵抗原(SEA)的单克隆抗体(MAbs)。这些 MAbs 与金和介孔二氧化硅纳米颗粒共轭,并用于开发 LFTS:结果:LFTS 的检测限(LoD)为 3 ng/ml。开发的 LFTS 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 96.7% 和 95%,而 POC-CCA 检测试剂盒的灵敏度和特异性分别为 85% 和 90%。根据粪便中的虫卵数将病例分为轻度、中度和重度感染组。在轻度感染组中,LFTS 的灵敏度高于 POC-CCA。当使用 KK 技术(每克粪便样本中的虫卵数 [EPG])作为参考检测时,纳米试纸条的卡帕值为 0.902,而 CCA 试纸条的卡帕值为 0.672,这表明 KK 与我们开发的 LFTS 几乎完全一致:这些结果证实,与市售试剂盒相比,LFTS 在血吸虫病的快速、灵敏和早期诊断方面具有可靠性和有效性。不过,在考虑将其引入本地或国际市场之前,建议在更大范围内对所开发的试剂条进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Parasitologica
Acta Parasitologica 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Parasitologica is an international journal covering the latest advances in the subject. Acta Parasitologica publishes original papers on all aspects of parasitology and host-parasite relationships, including the latest discoveries in biochemical and molecular biology of parasites, their physiology, morphology, taxonomy and ecology, as well as original research papers on immunology, pathology, and epidemiology of parasitic diseases in the context of medical, veterinary and biological sciences. The journal also publishes short research notes, invited review articles, book reviews. The journal was founded in 1953 as "Acta Parasitologica Polonica" by the Polish Parasitological Society and since 1954 has been published by W. Stefanski Institute of Parasitology of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw. Since 1992 in has appeared as Acta Parasitologica in four issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Oxidative Stress Reducing Potential of Spilanthes filicaulis (Schumach & Thonn) Ethyl-Acetate Sub-fractions on Plasmodium berghei Infected Female Mice. Home-Made Lateral Flow Test Strip Versus POC-CCA Assay for Detection of Active Schistosomiasis in Egypt. Microcotyle Tazeroutii n. sp. (Monogenea: Microcotylidae) from the Gills of the Boarfish Capros aper Linnaeus, 1758 (Teleostei: Caproidae) off the Algerian Coast, Western Mediterranean. Trend of N86Y and Y184F Mutations in Pfmdr1 Gene in Children Under Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention Coverage in Nanoro, Burkina Faso. Wildlife as Reservoirs of Encephalitozoon Cuniculi and Encephalitozoon Hellem and Molecular Genotyping of Encephalitozoon spp. in Small Mammals in the Czech Republic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1