Prenatal detection of placenta accreta spectrum using a sonographic checklist.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14943
Helena C Bartels, Jennifer M Walsh, Stephen Carroll, Paul Downey, Donal J O'Brien, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Clare C'Connor, Claire Thompson, Jennifer Donnelly, Donal J Brennan, Siobhan M Corcoran
{"title":"Prenatal detection of placenta accreta spectrum using a sonographic checklist.","authors":"Helena C Bartels, Jennifer M Walsh, Stephen Carroll, Paul Downey, Donal J O'Brien, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Clare C'Connor, Claire Thompson, Jennifer Donnelly, Donal J Brennan, Siobhan M Corcoran","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta proposed a checklist of ultrasound features for the antenatal detection of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). This study aims to assess the performance of the checklist in identifying histopathologically confirmed PAS cases in a cohort with a high pre-test probability of PAS, and identify if particular features are associated with PAS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a prospective multi-site cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2023. Consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound assessment for suspicion of PAS were included, and the sonographic checklist was completed at the time of ultrasound. Cases were defined as PAS where they had intraoperative findings as described by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading, and histopathological findings for hysterectomy and myometrial resection cases. All non-PAS cases in this study had placenta previa and at least one prior cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight participants met inclusion criteria, of whom 63 (80.7%) were diagnosed with PAS. Cesarean hysterectomy was performed in 49 cases (62.8%). Overall, third-trimester ultrasound performed at a median gestational age of 32 weeks (IQR 30-34 weeks) had a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.92) and specificity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.92) for detecting PAS, with a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 3.15 (95% CI 1.35 to 7.35) and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.41), respectively. Features most associated with PAS were abnormal placental lacunae (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.40 [95% CI 1.61 to 18.03] and myometrial thinning OR 6.87 [95% CI 1.93 to 24.4]). While many of the ultrasound features seen in PAS were also present in cases of placenta previa with prior Cesarean section, the median (IQR) number of features present in PAS cases was significantly higher than in the non-PAS placenta previa group (six features [3-8] vs. two features [0-3] p = 0.001). No case of non-PAS placenta previa had more than five features present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a standardized sonographic checklist had a high sensitivity and good specificity for the detection of PAS in this prospective cohort of well-classified PAS cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta proposed a checklist of ultrasound features for the antenatal detection of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). This study aims to assess the performance of the checklist in identifying histopathologically confirmed PAS cases in a cohort with a high pre-test probability of PAS, and identify if particular features are associated with PAS.

Material and methods: This is a prospective multi-site cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2023. Consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound assessment for suspicion of PAS were included, and the sonographic checklist was completed at the time of ultrasound. Cases were defined as PAS where they had intraoperative findings as described by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading, and histopathological findings for hysterectomy and myometrial resection cases. All non-PAS cases in this study had placenta previa and at least one prior cesarean delivery.

Results: Seventy-eight participants met inclusion criteria, of whom 63 (80.7%) were diagnosed with PAS. Cesarean hysterectomy was performed in 49 cases (62.8%). Overall, third-trimester ultrasound performed at a median gestational age of 32 weeks (IQR 30-34 weeks) had a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.92) and specificity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.92) for detecting PAS, with a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 3.15 (95% CI 1.35 to 7.35) and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.41), respectively. Features most associated with PAS were abnormal placental lacunae (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.40 [95% CI 1.61 to 18.03] and myometrial thinning OR 6.87 [95% CI 1.93 to 24.4]). While many of the ultrasound features seen in PAS were also present in cases of placenta previa with prior Cesarean section, the median (IQR) number of features present in PAS cases was significantly higher than in the non-PAS placenta previa group (six features [3-8] vs. two features [0-3] p = 0.001). No case of non-PAS placenta previa had more than five features present.

Conclusions: The use of a standardized sonographic checklist had a high sensitivity and good specificity for the detection of PAS in this prospective cohort of well-classified PAS cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用超声检查表进行产前胎盘植入谱检测。
导言:欧洲异常侵袭性胎盘工作组提出了产前检测胎盘早剥谱系(PAS)的超声特征核对表。本研究旨在评估该核对表在识别组织病理学确诊的 PAS 病例方面的性能,并确定特定特征是否与 PAS 相关:这是一项在2018年至2023年间进行的前瞻性多站点队列研究。纳入因怀疑 PAS 而接受超声评估的连续患者,并在超声检查时填写超声检查表。根据国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分级和组织病理学检查结果,子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术病例的术中检查结果均被定义为 PAS。本研究中的所有非PAS病例均为前置胎盘,至少曾有一次剖宫产经历:78名参与者符合纳入标准,其中63人(80.7%)被诊断为前置胎盘。49例(62.8%)进行了剖宫产子宫切除术。总体而言,在中位孕龄 32 周(IQR 30-34 周)时进行的第三孕期超声检查对 PAS 的检测灵敏度为 0.84(95% CI 0.73 至 0.92),特异度为 0.73(95% CI 0.45 至 0.92),阳性和阴性似然比分别为 3.15(95% CI 1.35 至 7.35)和 0.22(95% CI 0.11 至 0.41)。与 PAS 最相关的特征是异常胎盘裂孔(Odds Ratio [OR] 5.40 [95% CI 1.61 to 18.03],子宫肌层变薄 OR 6.87 [95% CI 1.93 to 24.4])。虽然在剖宫产前置胎盘病例中也出现了 PAS 中的许多超声特征,但 PAS 病例的特征中位数(IQR)明显高于非 PAS 前置胎盘组(6 个特征 [3-8] 对 2 个特征 [0-3] P = 0.001)。没有一例非PAS前置胎盘的特征超过5个:结论:在这批分类明确的前瞻性前置胎盘病例中,使用标准化超声检查表检测前置胎盘的灵敏度高、特异性好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1