Assessment of intercostal nerve block analgesia and local anesthetic infiltration for thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection: a comparative study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s13019-024-03095-x
Bing Huang, Jing Shi, Yingtong Feng, Jianfu Zhu, Sen Li, Ning Shan, Ying Xu, Yujing Zhang
{"title":"Assessment of intercostal nerve block analgesia and local anesthetic infiltration for thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection: a comparative study.","authors":"Bing Huang, Jing Shi, Yingtong Feng, Jianfu Zhu, Sen Li, Ning Shan, Ying Xu, Yujing Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-03095-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) on postoperative pain and recovery following thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection were randomly assigned to receive either ICNB (n = 80) or LAI (n = 80). An experienced anesthesiologist administered ultrasound guided ICNB at the T4 and T7 levels with 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride for the ICNB group. Instead, the LAI group received 10 mL of the same concentration of ropivacaine hydrochloride at the same concentration used for ICNB for infiltration anesthesia at the incision sites. Out of the initial cohort, 146 patients completed the study (ICNB group, n = 71; LAI group, n = 75). The collected data included preoperative clinical characteristics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at various time points post-surgery (6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h). Additionally, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire was administered 24 h after surgery, and sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in drainage volume, use of additional analgesics, duration of chest tube placement, or hospital stay between the two groups. However, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores and QoR-15 scores 24 h postoperatively (p < 0.05), indicating better pain management and recovery. The ICNB group also reported better sleep quality, as reflected by lower PSQI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICNB provides superior analgesia compared to LAI after thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae, significantly improving postoperative recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03095-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) on postoperative pain and recovery following thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae.

Methods: A total of 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection were randomly assigned to receive either ICNB (n = 80) or LAI (n = 80). An experienced anesthesiologist administered ultrasound guided ICNB at the T4 and T7 levels with 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride for the ICNB group. Instead, the LAI group received 10 mL of the same concentration of ropivacaine hydrochloride at the same concentration used for ICNB for infiltration anesthesia at the incision sites. Out of the initial cohort, 146 patients completed the study (ICNB group, n = 71; LAI group, n = 75). The collected data included preoperative clinical characteristics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at various time points post-surgery (6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h). Additionally, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire was administered 24 h after surgery, and sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

Results: No significant differences were found in drainage volume, use of additional analgesics, duration of chest tube placement, or hospital stay between the two groups. However, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores and QoR-15 scores 24 h postoperatively (p < 0.05), indicating better pain management and recovery. The ICNB group also reported better sleep quality, as reflected by lower PSQI scores.

Conclusion: ICNB provides superior analgesia compared to LAI after thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae, significantly improving postoperative recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔镜肺大泡切除术中肋间神经阻滞镇痛和局麻药浸润的评估:一项比较研究。
研究目的本研究旨在比较肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)和局麻药浸润(LAI)对胸腔镜肺大泡切除术后疼痛和恢复的镇痛效果:共有 160 名接受胸腔镜肺大泡切除术的患者被随机分配接受 ICNB(80 人)或 LAI(80 人)治疗。ICNB组由一名经验丰富的麻醉师在超声引导下在T4和T7水平进行ICNB,使用5毫升0.375%盐酸罗哌卡因。而 LAI 组则使用 10 mL 浓度与 ICNB 相同的盐酸罗哌卡因对切口部位进行浸润麻醉。在初始组群中,146 名患者完成了研究(ICNB 组,n = 71;LAI 组,n = 75)。收集的数据包括术前临床特征、术后不同时间点(6、12、24、48 和 72 小时)的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。此外,还在术后 24 小时进行了恢复质量-15(QoR-15)问卷调查,并使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估了睡眠质量:结果:两组患者在引流量、额外镇痛药的使用、胸腔置管时间和住院时间上没有明显差异。然而,ICNB 组术后 24 小时的 VAS 评分和 QoR-15 评分明显低于 ICNB 组(p 结论:ICNB 可提供更佳的镇痛效果:与 LAI 相比,ICNB 在胸腔镜肺大泡切除术后的镇痛效果更佳,可显著改善术后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Fast Fourier transform analysis of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement during coronary artery bypass grafting. Respiratory endoscopy intervention in 12 patients with refractory persistent air leakage after pulmonary surgery: a preliminary study of case series. Correction: Apatinib monotherapy for early non-small cell lung cancer: a case report. Contemporary comparative surgical outcomes of type A aortic dissection in US and China: an analysis of the national inpatient sample database and a Chinese multi-institutional registry. LncRNA CASC9 facilitates papillary thyroid cancer development and doxorubicin resistance via miR-28-3p/BCL-2 axis and PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1