Validity of the Tablet-Based Digital Cognitive Test (SCST) in Identifying Different Degrees of Cognitive Impairment.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Korean Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e247
Dayeong An, Joon Soo Shin, Nanyoung Bae, Sang Won Seo, Duk L Na
{"title":"Validity of the Tablet-Based Digital Cognitive Test (SCST) in Identifying Different Degrees of Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Dayeong An, Joon Soo Shin, Nanyoung Bae, Sang Won Seo, Duk L Na","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As society ages, the incidence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias has surged, highlighting the importance of early dementia diagnosis. The Seoul Cognitive Status Test (SCST), a digital neuropsychological test, is designed for the early detection of cognitive impairment and has been standardized to establish reliability and validity. This study aims to verify whether the SCST effectively discriminates between groups based on three cognitive statuses (subjective cognitive decline [SCD], mild cognitive impairment [MCI], Dementia) in a large sample. We also seek to determine whether the SCST discriminates between individuals with three different cognitive statuses as defined by the Cognitive Dementia Rating (CDR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 254 participants from a dementia clinic who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery (Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-II) during the dementia evaluation by experienced neurologists (55 with SCD, 126 with MCI, 73 with dementia). In addition, the degree of cognitive decline in participants was classified by CDR level (186 with CDR 0.5, 52 with CDR 1, 15 with CDR 2). One-way analysis of variance was used to compare SCST scores according to each of the three cognitive status groups and CDR levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SCST total score, cognitive domain scores (attention, language, visuospatial function, memory, executive function), and most of the subtest scores decreased significantly in the order of SCD, MCI and dementia. Likewise, the differences in SCST scores between CDR levels were significant, particularly in distinguishing between CDR 0.5 and CDR 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reaffirmed that the SCST can significantly discriminate between groups of individuals with SCD, MCI, and dementia based on a large sample. Furthermore, differences in SCT scores were found across the levels of CDR, confirming the clinical utility of the SCST. These findings suggest that the SCST is an efficient and useful neuropsychological test for the sensitive detection of early cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As society ages, the incidence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias has surged, highlighting the importance of early dementia diagnosis. The Seoul Cognitive Status Test (SCST), a digital neuropsychological test, is designed for the early detection of cognitive impairment and has been standardized to establish reliability and validity. This study aims to verify whether the SCST effectively discriminates between groups based on three cognitive statuses (subjective cognitive decline [SCD], mild cognitive impairment [MCI], Dementia) in a large sample. We also seek to determine whether the SCST discriminates between individuals with three different cognitive statuses as defined by the Cognitive Dementia Rating (CDR).

Methods: We enrolled 254 participants from a dementia clinic who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery (Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-II) during the dementia evaluation by experienced neurologists (55 with SCD, 126 with MCI, 73 with dementia). In addition, the degree of cognitive decline in participants was classified by CDR level (186 with CDR 0.5, 52 with CDR 1, 15 with CDR 2). One-way analysis of variance was used to compare SCST scores according to each of the three cognitive status groups and CDR levels.

Results: The SCST total score, cognitive domain scores (attention, language, visuospatial function, memory, executive function), and most of the subtest scores decreased significantly in the order of SCD, MCI and dementia. Likewise, the differences in SCST scores between CDR levels were significant, particularly in distinguishing between CDR 0.5 and CDR 1.

Conclusion: This study reaffirmed that the SCST can significantly discriminate between groups of individuals with SCD, MCI, and dementia based on a large sample. Furthermore, differences in SCT scores were found across the levels of CDR, confirming the clinical utility of the SCST. These findings suggest that the SCST is an efficient and useful neuropsychological test for the sensitive detection of early cognitive impairment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于平板电脑的数字认知测试 (SCST) 在识别不同程度认知障碍方面的有效性。
背景:随着社会老龄化,阿尔茨海默病和其他痴呆症的发病率激增,这凸显了早期诊断痴呆症的重要性。首尔认知状态测试(SCST)是一种数字神经心理测试,专为早期发现认知障碍而设计,并已标准化以确定其可靠性和有效性。本研究旨在验证 SCST 是否能在大样本中根据三种认知状态(主观认知功能减退 [SCD]、轻度认知功能障碍 [MCI]、痴呆症)有效区分不同群体。我们还试图确定 SCST 是否能区分认知痴呆评级(CDR)所定义的三种不同认知状态的个体:我们从一家痴呆症诊所招募了 254 名参与者,他们在由经验丰富的神经科医生进行痴呆症评估期间接受了全面的神经心理测试(首尔神经心理筛查测试-II)(其中 55 人患有 SCD,126 人患有 MCI,73 人患有痴呆症)。此外,参与者的认知能力衰退程度按 CDR 水平进行了分类(186 人 CDR 为 0.5,52 人 CDR 为 1,15 人 CDR 为 2)。采用单因素方差分析比较了三个认知状况组和 CDR 水平的 SCST 得分:结果:SCST总分、认知领域得分(注意力、语言、视觉空间功能、记忆力、执行功能)和大部分分测验分数均按SCD、MCI和痴呆的顺序显著下降。同样,不同 CDR 水平的 SCST 分数差异也很大,尤其是在区分 CDR 0.5 和 CDR 1 时:本研究再次证实,基于大样本,SCST 可显著区分 SCD、MCI 和痴呆症患者群体。此外,在不同的 CDR 水平下,SCT 分数也存在差异,这证实了 SCST 的临床实用性。这些研究结果表明,SCST 是一种高效实用的神经心理学测试,可用于早期认知功能障碍的敏感检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of the Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine for Preventing Critical Infection From the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in the Republic of Korea. LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors. Modified Albumin-Bilirubin Grade After Curative Treatment: Predicting the Risk of Late Intrahepatic Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Validity of the Tablet-Based Digital Cognitive Test (SCST) in Identifying Different Degrees of Cognitive Impairment. Diagnostic Utility of Whole Genome Sequencing After Negative Karyotyping/Chromosomal Microarray in Infants Born With Multiple Congenital Anomalies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1