Predicting the resolution of hypertension following adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism: Controversies and unresolved issues a narrative review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03486-7
Luigi Marzano
{"title":"Predicting the resolution of hypertension following adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism: Controversies and unresolved issues a narrative review.","authors":"Luigi Marzano","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03486-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension resolution following adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) remains a critical clinical challenge. Identifying preoperatively which patients will become normotensive is both a priority and a point of contention. In this narrative review, we explore the controversies and unresolved issues surrounding the prediction of hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy in PA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published between 1954 and 2024 that evaluated all studies that discussed predictive models for hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients. Databases searched included MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified several predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution, including female sex, duration of hypertension, antihypertensive medication, and BMI. However, inconsistencies in study designs and patient populations led to varied conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although certain predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients are supported by evidence, significant controversies and unresolved issues remain. While the current predictive models provide valuable insights, there is a clear need for further research in this area. Future studies should focus on validating and refining these models.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03486-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension resolution following adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) remains a critical clinical challenge. Identifying preoperatively which patients will become normotensive is both a priority and a point of contention. In this narrative review, we explore the controversies and unresolved issues surrounding the prediction of hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy in PA.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published between 1954 and 2024 that evaluated all studies that discussed predictive models for hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients. Databases searched included MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science databases.

Results: The review identified several predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution, including female sex, duration of hypertension, antihypertensive medication, and BMI. However, inconsistencies in study designs and patient populations led to varied conclusions.

Conclusions: Although certain predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients are supported by evidence, significant controversies and unresolved issues remain. While the current predictive models provide valuable insights, there is a clear need for further research in this area. Future studies should focus on validating and refining these models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性醛固酮增多症肾上腺切除术后高血压缓解的预测:争议和悬而未决的问题叙述性综述。
背景:原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)患者肾上腺切除术后的高血压缓解仍是一项严峻的临床挑战。术前确定哪些患者的血压会恢复正常既是当务之急,也是争议焦点。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们探讨了有关预测 PA 患者肾上腺切除术后高血压缓解的争议和未决问题:我们进行了全面的文献综述,重点关注 1954 年至 2024 年间发表的研究,评估了所有讨论 PA 患者肾上腺切除术后高血压缓解预测模型的研究。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE®、Ovid Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库:结果:综述发现了几种高血压缓解的预测因素和预测模型,包括女性性别、高血压持续时间、抗高血压药物和体重指数。然而,研究设计和患者人群的不一致导致了不同的结论:结论:虽然 PA 患者肾上腺切除术后高血压缓解的某些预测因素和预测模型有证据支持,但仍存在重大争议和未解决的问题。虽然目前的预测模型提供了有价值的见解,但该领域显然需要进一步研究。未来的研究应侧重于验证和完善这些模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study. Comparative effectiveness totally endoscopic thyroidectomy via completely submental tri-hole approach and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy without insufflation. Curative treatment for oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer- results of a prospective multicenter study. New purse-string suture clamp and multi-functional seal cap: a simple intracorporeal circular-stapled oesophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. The importance of microvascular invasion in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1