Advances in the Management of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): A Comprehensive Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2509345
Arianna Morena, Federico Giacobbe, Ovidio De Filippo, Filippo Angelini, Francesco Bruno, Stefano Siliano, Giuseppe Giannino, Veronica Dusi, Matteo Bianco, Carloalberto Biolé, Ferdinando Varbella, Enrico Cerrato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
{"title":"Advances in the Management of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Arianna Morena, Federico Giacobbe, Ovidio De Filippo, Filippo Angelini, Francesco Bruno, Stefano Siliano, Giuseppe Giannino, Veronica Dusi, Matteo Bianco, Carloalberto Biolé, Ferdinando Varbella, Enrico Cerrato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2509345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare but significant cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), primarily affecting young women, often during pregnancy. Despite its rarity, SCAD poses challenges due to limited evidence on management strategies. This review examines the current state of art of SCAD management, integrating interventional and clinical insights from recent studies. The epidemiology of SCAD is related to its elusive nature, representing only a small fraction of ACS cases, while certainly underestimated. Proposed risk factors include genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences. Angiographic classification may help in SCAD diagnosis, but confirmation often relies on intracoronary imaging. Conservative management constitutes the primary approach, showing efficacy in most cases, although optimal antiplatelet therapy (APT) remains debated due to bleeding risks associated with intramural hematoma. Revascularization is reserved for high-risk cases, guided by angiographic and clinical criteria, with a focus on restoring flow rather than resolving dissection. Interventional strategies emphasize a minimalist approach to reduce complications, utilizing techniques such as balloon dilation and stent placement tailored to individual cases. Long-term outcomes highlight the risk of recurrence, necessitating vigilant follow-up and arrhythmic risk assessment, particularly in patients presenting with ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, SCAD management always represents a challenge for the physician, both from a clinical and interventional point of view. Recent clinical evidence and a multidisciplinary approach are vital for optimizing patient outcomes and preventing recurrence. This review offers a concise framework for navigating the complexities of SCAD management in clinical practice and proposes an algorithm for its management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 9","pages":"345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare but significant cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), primarily affecting young women, often during pregnancy. Despite its rarity, SCAD poses challenges due to limited evidence on management strategies. This review examines the current state of art of SCAD management, integrating interventional and clinical insights from recent studies. The epidemiology of SCAD is related to its elusive nature, representing only a small fraction of ACS cases, while certainly underestimated. Proposed risk factors include genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences. Angiographic classification may help in SCAD diagnosis, but confirmation often relies on intracoronary imaging. Conservative management constitutes the primary approach, showing efficacy in most cases, although optimal antiplatelet therapy (APT) remains debated due to bleeding risks associated with intramural hematoma. Revascularization is reserved for high-risk cases, guided by angiographic and clinical criteria, with a focus on restoring flow rather than resolving dissection. Interventional strategies emphasize a minimalist approach to reduce complications, utilizing techniques such as balloon dilation and stent placement tailored to individual cases. Long-term outcomes highlight the risk of recurrence, necessitating vigilant follow-up and arrhythmic risk assessment, particularly in patients presenting with ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, SCAD management always represents a challenge for the physician, both from a clinical and interventional point of view. Recent clinical evidence and a multidisciplinary approach are vital for optimizing patient outcomes and preventing recurrence. This review offers a concise framework for navigating the complexities of SCAD management in clinical practice and proposes an algorithm for its management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自发性冠状动脉夹层 (SCAD) 的治疗进展:全面回顾。
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的一个罕见但重要的病因,主要影响年轻女性,通常发生在妊娠期。尽管自发性冠状动脉夹层非常罕见,但由于管理策略的证据有限,因此给 SCAD 带来了挑战。本综述结合近期研究中的介入治疗和临床见解,探讨了 SCAD 的治疗现状。SCAD 的流行病学与其难以捉摸的性质有关,它只占 ACS 病例的一小部分,但肯定被低估了。拟议的风险因素包括遗传、激素和环境影响。血管造影分类有助于 SCAD 的诊断,但确诊通常需要依靠冠状动脉内造影。保守治疗是最主要的方法,在大多数病例中均显示出疗效,但最佳的抗血小板疗法(APT)仍存在争议,因为存在与冠状动脉内血肿相关的出血风险。根据血管造影和临床标准,为高风险病例保留血管重建术,重点是恢复血流而不是解决夹层。介入治疗策略强调以最低限度的方法减少并发症,根据不同病例采用球囊扩张和支架置入等技术。长期疗效凸显了复发风险,因此有必要进行警惕性随访和心律失常风险评估,尤其是出现室性心律失常的患者。总之,无论是从临床角度还是从介入角度来看,SCAD 的治疗对医生来说都是一项挑战。最新的临床证据和多学科方法对于优化患者预后和预防复发至关重要。本综述为在临床实践中应对复杂的 SCAD 管理提供了一个简明的框架,并提出了一种管理算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Biomarker-Guided Versus Clinically Guided Management Strategies for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Myocardial Revascularization in 2025: A Clinical Perspective on the Evolution of Technologies, Strategic Decision-Making, and Future Horizons. Evolution of Clinical Indications for Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair. Hemolysis in Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review. The Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Exercises in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1