Retrospective Exploration of Botulinum Toxin Injection for Pharyngoesophageal Segment Dysfunction Post-laryngectomy.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.181
Ruby J Kazemi, Andrew D P Prince, Keith A Casper, Matthew E Spector, Joshua D Smith, Mark E P Prince
{"title":"Retrospective Exploration of Botulinum Toxin Injection for Pharyngoesophageal Segment Dysfunction Post-laryngectomy.","authors":"Ruby J Kazemi, Andrew D P Prince, Keith A Casper, Matthew E Spector, Joshua D Smith, Mark E P Prince","doi":"10.1002/oto2.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess our institution's experience with botulinum toxin A injection management of pharyngoesophageal (PE) segment dysfunction after laryngectomy in tracheoesophageal voice and swallowing restoration<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review of 43 patients who had Botox as treatment for PE dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic center with fellowship-trained otolaryngologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and post-injection outcomes were evaluated using chart review, and the severity of symptoms was recorded based on the subjective assessment by the patient, speech language pathologists, and the treating surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients were treated for PE dysfunction with botulinum toxin A injection. Most patients were male (n = 35, 81.4%), underwent primary cricopharnygeal myotomy (n = 36, 83.7%), and 37 (86%) had both dysphagia and speech concerns. Our injection methods included percutaneous injection by videofluoroscopy (n = 19, 44.2%), transnasal esophagoscopy (17, 40.5%), electromyography (n = 3, 7%), ultrasound (n = 1, 2.3%), or in the operating room (n = 3,7%). We found that 37 (86%) patients had subjective improvement in their symptoms, with 16 (38.1%) improving in both swallow and voice. There were no significant complications, or subjective difference in speech and swallowing outcomes by method of injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Botulinum toxin A injection appears to be safe and effective for treating difficulty with speech and swallowing due to PE dysfunction after laryngectomy. Institutions should develop standard protocols for treatment and assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess our institution's experience with botulinum toxin A injection management of pharyngoesophageal (PE) segment dysfunction after laryngectomy in tracheoesophageal voice and swallowing restoration.

Study design: A retrospective review of 43 patients who had Botox as treatment for PE dysfunction.

Setting: Tertiary academic center with fellowship-trained otolaryngologists.

Methods: Pre- and post-injection outcomes were evaluated using chart review, and the severity of symptoms was recorded based on the subjective assessment by the patient, speech language pathologists, and the treating surgeon.

Results: Forty-three patients were treated for PE dysfunction with botulinum toxin A injection. Most patients were male (n = 35, 81.4%), underwent primary cricopharnygeal myotomy (n = 36, 83.7%), and 37 (86%) had both dysphagia and speech concerns. Our injection methods included percutaneous injection by videofluoroscopy (n = 19, 44.2%), transnasal esophagoscopy (17, 40.5%), electromyography (n = 3, 7%), ultrasound (n = 1, 2.3%), or in the operating room (n = 3,7%). We found that 37 (86%) patients had subjective improvement in their symptoms, with 16 (38.1%) improving in both swallow and voice. There were no significant complications, or subjective difference in speech and swallowing outcomes by method of injection.

Conclusion: Botulinum toxin A injection appears to be safe and effective for treating difficulty with speech and swallowing due to PE dysfunction after laryngectomy. Institutions should develop standard protocols for treatment and assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗喉切除术后咽喉食管段功能障碍的回顾性研究。
目的:评估本机构在气管食管发声和吞咽恢复中使用 A 型肉毒毒素注射治疗喉切除术后咽喉食管 (PE) 部分功能障碍的经验:对43名使用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗PE功能障碍的患者进行回顾性研究:地点:三级学术中心,由接受过研究培训的耳鼻喉科专家组成:方法:通过病历审查评估注射前后的效果,并根据患者、语言病理学家和主治医生的主观评估记录症状的严重程度:43名患者接受了A型肉毒毒素注射治疗PE功能障碍。大多数患者为男性(35 人,81.4%),接受了初级环咽肌切开术(36 人,83.7%),37 人(86%)同时存在吞咽困难和言语障碍。我们的注射方法包括通过视频荧光镜(19 人,占 44.2%)、经鼻食管镜(17 人,占 40.5%)、肌电图(3 人,占 7%)、超声波(1 人,占 2.3%)或在手术室(3 人,占 7%)进行经皮注射。我们发现,37 名(86%)患者的主观症状有所改善,其中 16 名(38.1%)患者的吞咽和发声症状均有所改善。没有明显的并发症,语言和吞咽效果也没有因注射方法而产生主观差异:结论:注射肉毒杆菌毒素A对治疗喉切除术后因PE功能障碍导致的言语和吞咽困难似乎安全有效。医疗机构应制定标准的治疗和评估方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Patient Portal Engagement in Otolaryngology. Effects of Music on Pain and Anxiety During Otolaryngology Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Impact of Language Barriers and Age on English Hearing Test App Accuracy for Polish Users. Epidemiology of Barbell Weightlifting-Related Head and Neck Injuries in the United States: A 10-Year Analysis of National Injury Data. Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1