Ruby J Kazemi, Andrew D P Prince, Keith A Casper, Matthew E Spector, Joshua D Smith, Mark E P Prince
{"title":"Retrospective Exploration of Botulinum Toxin Injection for Pharyngoesophageal Segment Dysfunction Post-laryngectomy.","authors":"Ruby J Kazemi, Andrew D P Prince, Keith A Casper, Matthew E Spector, Joshua D Smith, Mark E P Prince","doi":"10.1002/oto2.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess our institution's experience with botulinum toxin A injection management of pharyngoesophageal (PE) segment dysfunction after laryngectomy in tracheoesophageal voice and swallowing restoration<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review of 43 patients who had Botox as treatment for PE dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic center with fellowship-trained otolaryngologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and post-injection outcomes were evaluated using chart review, and the severity of symptoms was recorded based on the subjective assessment by the patient, speech language pathologists, and the treating surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients were treated for PE dysfunction with botulinum toxin A injection. Most patients were male (n = 35, 81.4%), underwent primary cricopharnygeal myotomy (n = 36, 83.7%), and 37 (86%) had both dysphagia and speech concerns. Our injection methods included percutaneous injection by videofluoroscopy (n = 19, 44.2%), transnasal esophagoscopy (17, 40.5%), electromyography (n = 3, 7%), ultrasound (n = 1, 2.3%), or in the operating room (n = 3,7%). We found that 37 (86%) patients had subjective improvement in their symptoms, with 16 (38.1%) improving in both swallow and voice. There were no significant complications, or subjective difference in speech and swallowing outcomes by method of injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Botulinum toxin A injection appears to be safe and effective for treating difficulty with speech and swallowing due to PE dysfunction after laryngectomy. Institutions should develop standard protocols for treatment and assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess our institution's experience with botulinum toxin A injection management of pharyngoesophageal (PE) segment dysfunction after laryngectomy in tracheoesophageal voice and swallowing restoration.
Study design: A retrospective review of 43 patients who had Botox as treatment for PE dysfunction.
Setting: Tertiary academic center with fellowship-trained otolaryngologists.
Methods: Pre- and post-injection outcomes were evaluated using chart review, and the severity of symptoms was recorded based on the subjective assessment by the patient, speech language pathologists, and the treating surgeon.
Results: Forty-three patients were treated for PE dysfunction with botulinum toxin A injection. Most patients were male (n = 35, 81.4%), underwent primary cricopharnygeal myotomy (n = 36, 83.7%), and 37 (86%) had both dysphagia and speech concerns. Our injection methods included percutaneous injection by videofluoroscopy (n = 19, 44.2%), transnasal esophagoscopy (17, 40.5%), electromyography (n = 3, 7%), ultrasound (n = 1, 2.3%), or in the operating room (n = 3,7%). We found that 37 (86%) patients had subjective improvement in their symptoms, with 16 (38.1%) improving in both swallow and voice. There were no significant complications, or subjective difference in speech and swallowing outcomes by method of injection.
Conclusion: Botulinum toxin A injection appears to be safe and effective for treating difficulty with speech and swallowing due to PE dysfunction after laryngectomy. Institutions should develop standard protocols for treatment and assessment.