Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Combined with SYNTAX Scores I/II in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Small-Sample, Single-Center Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2509329
Shuyi Zhang, Ming Wang, Qian Gan, Xinrong Zhai, Yang Chen, Shaofeng Guan, Xinxin Xu, Jiasheng Wen, Xinkai Qu, Wenzheng Han
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Combined with SYNTAX Scores I/II in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Small-Sample, Single-Center Study.","authors":"Shuyi Zhang, Ming Wang, Qian Gan, Xinrong Zhai, Yang Chen, Shaofeng Guan, Xinxin Xu, Jiasheng Wen, Xinkai Qu, Wenzheng Han","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2509329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A fractional flow reserve (FFR)-fixed-SYNTAX score could decrease the number of high-risk patients. This study explored the prognostic value of non-invasive quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-fixed-SYNTAX I/II scores in multivessel disease patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, small-sample, observational study. Multivessel coronary disease patients were enrolled and finished a 1-year follow-up. SYNTAX scores I/II and functional SYNTAX scores I/II based on QFR (cut-off value of 0.85) were calculated for all patients. The composite occurrence of cardiac deaths, any myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization were analyzed using a different score system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 patients were stratified into risk groups based on a different scoring system. FSS (functional SYNTAX score) and FSSII (functional SYNTAX score II) reduce the radio of high-risk major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), transforming the patients from high-risk to medium- and low-risk. Furthermore, FSSII (hazard ratio (HR): 1.069, 95% CI: 1.025-1.115, <i>p =</i> 0.002) showed a better relationship with MACEs than the other score systems. After recalculating SSII, the survival-free ratio stratified by FSSII decreased from 38.46% to 27.27% in the high-risk group and increased from 84.09% to 86.05% in the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FSS or FSSII could decrease the number of high-risk patients compared to SYNTAX score (SS) and FSS. SYNTAX II score (SSII) and FSSII showed a better predictive ability than other scoring systems for under-risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 9","pages":"329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A fractional flow reserve (FFR)-fixed-SYNTAX score could decrease the number of high-risk patients. This study explored the prognostic value of non-invasive quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-fixed-SYNTAX I/II scores in multivessel disease patients.

Methods: This was a single-center, small-sample, observational study. Multivessel coronary disease patients were enrolled and finished a 1-year follow-up. SYNTAX scores I/II and functional SYNTAX scores I/II based on QFR (cut-off value of 0.85) were calculated for all patients. The composite occurrence of cardiac deaths, any myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization were analyzed using a different score system.

Results: A total of 160 patients were stratified into risk groups based on a different scoring system. FSS (functional SYNTAX score) and FSSII (functional SYNTAX score II) reduce the radio of high-risk major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), transforming the patients from high-risk to medium- and low-risk. Furthermore, FSSII (hazard ratio (HR): 1.069, 95% CI: 1.025-1.115, p = 0.002) showed a better relationship with MACEs than the other score systems. After recalculating SSII, the survival-free ratio stratified by FSSII decreased from 38.46% to 27.27% in the high-risk group and increased from 84.09% to 86.05% in the low-risk group.

Conclusions: FSS or FSSII could decrease the number of high-risk patients compared to SYNTAX score (SS) and FSS. SYNTAX II score (SSII) and FSSII showed a better predictive ability than other scoring systems for under-risk stratification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量血流比率与 SYNTAX 评分 I/II 在多支血管冠状动脉疾病中的预后价值:一项小样本、单中心研究。
背景:分数血流储备(FFR)-固定SYNTAX评分可减少高危患者的数量。本研究探讨了无创定量血流比率(QFR)-固定SYNTAX I/II评分在多血管疾病患者中的预后价值:这是一项单中心、小样本、观察性研究。方法:这是一项单中心、小样本的观察性研究,研究对象为多支冠状动脉疾病患者,并完成了为期一年的随访。所有患者的 SYNTAX 评分 I/II 和基于 QFR 的功能性 SYNTAX 评分 I/II(临界值为 0.85)均已计算。使用不同的评分系统分析了心脏性死亡、任何心肌梗死或缺血导致的血管再通的综合发生率:结果:根据不同的评分系统对 160 名患者进行了风险分层。FSS(功能性 SYNTAX 评分)和 FSSII(功能性 SYNTAX 评分 II)降低了高风险主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率,使患者从高风险转变为中风险和低风险。此外,与其他评分系统相比,FSSII(危险比(HR):1.069,95% CI:1.025-1.115,P = 0.002)与 MACEs 的关系更好。重新计算SSII后,按FSSII分层的无生存率在高风险组从38.46%降至27.27%,在低风险组从84.09%增至86.05%:与 SYNTAX 评分(SS)和 FSS 相比,FSS 或 FSSII 可以减少高危患者的数量。与其他评分系统相比,SYNTAX II评分(SSII)和FSSII对低危分层的预测能力更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Biomarker-Guided Versus Clinically Guided Management Strategies for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Myocardial Revascularization in 2025: A Clinical Perspective on the Evolution of Technologies, Strategic Decision-Making, and Future Horizons. Evolution of Clinical Indications for Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair. Hemolysis in Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review. The Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Exercises in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1