Workplace Violence Against Emergency Medical Services (EMS): A Prospective 12-Month Cohort Study Evaluating Prevalence and Risk Factors Within a Large, Multistate EMS Agency.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2411020
Sarayna S McGuire, Fernanda Bellolio, Bradley J Buck, Chad P Liedl, Dayne D Stuhr, Aidan F Mullan, Mykell Ryan Buffum, Casey M Clements
{"title":"Workplace Violence Against Emergency Medical Services (EMS): A Prospective 12-Month Cohort Study Evaluating Prevalence and Risk Factors Within a Large, Multistate EMS Agency.","authors":"Sarayna S McGuire, Fernanda Bellolio, Bradley J Buck, Chad P Liedl, Dayne D Stuhr, Aidan F Mullan, Mykell Ryan Buffum, Casey M Clements","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2411020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of workplace violence (WPV) experienced by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians across a large, multistate ground/air EMS agency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a prospective cohort study design from 1 December 2022 to 30 November 2023. A checkbox was added within the electronic medical record (EMR) asking staff to indicate whether WPV occurred. Patient characteristics, encounter (run), and crew factors were abstracted. Potential risk factors for WPV were assessed using logistic regression, with the occurrence of any form of violence as the primary outcome of interest. Models were both univariable, assessing each risk factor individually, and multivariable, assessing all risk factors together to identify independent factors associated with higher risk of WPV. Multivariable model results were reported using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102,632 runs were included, 95.7% (<i>n</i> = 98,234) included checkbox documentation. There were 843 runs (0.86 per 100 runs, 95% CI 0.80-0.92) identified by EMS clinicians as WPV having occurred, including verbal abuse (<i>n</i> = 482), physical assault (<i>n</i> = 142), and both abuse and assault (<i>n</i> = 219). Risk factors for violence included male patient gender (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.70, <i>p</i> < 0.001), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) <u>></u>1 (aOR 16.97, 95% CI 13.71-21.01, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 9-1-1 runs to include emergent (P1; aOR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.17-2.63, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and urgent (P2; aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08-2.50, <i>p</i> = 0.021) priority, compared to P3/scheduled transfer or P4/trip requests. Factors associated with lower risk for violence included older patients (aOR per 10 years = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and run time of day between 0601-1200 h compared to 0000-0600 h (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Only 2.7% of violent runs captured through the EMR were reported through official processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Verbal and/or physical violence is recognized in nearly 1% of EMS runs. We recommend prioritizing WPV prevention and mitigation strategies around identified risk factors and simplifying the WPV reporting process in order to reduce staff administrative burden and encourage optimal capturing of violent events.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2411020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of workplace violence (WPV) experienced by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians across a large, multistate ground/air EMS agency.

Methods: We used a prospective cohort study design from 1 December 2022 to 30 November 2023. A checkbox was added within the electronic medical record (EMR) asking staff to indicate whether WPV occurred. Patient characteristics, encounter (run), and crew factors were abstracted. Potential risk factors for WPV were assessed using logistic regression, with the occurrence of any form of violence as the primary outcome of interest. Models were both univariable, assessing each risk factor individually, and multivariable, assessing all risk factors together to identify independent factors associated with higher risk of WPV. Multivariable model results were reported using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: A total of 102,632 runs were included, 95.7% (n = 98,234) included checkbox documentation. There were 843 runs (0.86 per 100 runs, 95% CI 0.80-0.92) identified by EMS clinicians as WPV having occurred, including verbal abuse (n = 482), physical assault (n = 142), and both abuse and assault (n = 219). Risk factors for violence included male patient gender (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.70, p < 0.001), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) >1 (aOR 16.97, 95% CI 13.71-21.01, p < 0.001), and 9-1-1 runs to include emergent (P1; aOR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.17-2.63, p = 0.007) and urgent (P2; aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08-2.50, p = 0.021) priority, compared to P3/scheduled transfer or P4/trip requests. Factors associated with lower risk for violence included older patients (aOR per 10 years = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98, p = 0.007) and run time of day between 0601-1200 h compared to 0000-0600 h (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, p = 0.004). Only 2.7% of violent runs captured through the EMR were reported through official processes.

Conclusions: Verbal and/or physical violence is recognized in nearly 1% of EMS runs. We recommend prioritizing WPV prevention and mitigation strategies around identified risk factors and simplifying the WPV reporting process in order to reduce staff administrative burden and encourage optimal capturing of violent events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对紧急医疗服务 (EMS) 的工作场所暴力:一项为期 12 个月的前瞻性队列研究,评估了一个大型多州紧急医疗服务机构内的普遍性和风险因素。
目的确定一个大型多州地面/空中紧急医疗服务机构的紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生所经历的工作场所暴力(WPV)的发生率和相关风险因素:我们采用了前瞻性队列研究设计,研究时间为 2022 年 12 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 30 日。电子病历(EMR)中增加了一个复选框,要求工作人员指出是否发生了 WPV。研究人员抽取了患者特征、就诊(运行)情况和机组人员因素。使用逻辑回归法评估 WPV 的潜在风险因素,并将发生任何形式的暴力行为作为主要关注结果。模型包括单变量模型和多变量模型,前者对每个风险因素进行单独评估,后者对所有风险因素进行综合评估,以确定与较高 WPV 风险相关的独立因素。多变量模型结果采用几率比(aORs)和 95% 置信区间进行报告:共纳入 102,632 次运行,95.7%(n= 98,234 次)包含复选框文档。有 843 次(每 100 次 0.86,95% CI 0.80-0.92)急救医生确认发生过 WPV,包括辱骂(n= 482)、殴打(n= 142)以及辱骂和殴打(n= 219)。暴力行为的风险因素包括男性患者性别(aOR 1.45,95% CI 1.24 - 1.70,p 1(aOR 16.97,95% CI 13.71 - 21.01,p 结论):在近 1%的急救服务中发现了言语和/或肢体暴力。我们建议围绕已识别的风险因素优先制定 WPV 预防和缓解策略,并简化 WPV 报告流程,以减轻员工的行政负担,鼓励以最佳方式捕获暴力事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Key Takeaways and Progress on Leveraging EMS in Overdose Response Among Five Learning Collaborative States. Uses of Fibrinogen Concentrate in Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy in the Prehospital Environment: A Scoping Review. Correlation Between EtCO2 and PCO2 in Patients Undergoing Critical Care Transport. The National Association of EMS Physicians Compendium of Prehospital Trauma Management Position Statements and Resource Documents. Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma- a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1