COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated individuals in a primary care setting, Pretoria.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL South African Family Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.4102/safp.v66i1.5988
Dikonketjo M P Moeti, Indiran Govender, Tombo Bongongo
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated individuals in a primary care setting, Pretoria.","authors":"Dikonketjo M P Moeti, Indiran Govender, Tombo Bongongo","doi":"10.4102/safp.v66i1.5988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> South Africa faced challenges while implementing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures such as mass vaccination. Some people rejected or were hesitant to receive government-recommended vaccines. This study explored COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among unvaccinated individuals in a primary care setting in Pretoria, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was an exploratory phenomenological study that included one-on-one interviews with 12 individuals at Temba Community Health Centre in Pretoria, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The research revealed five themes: perceptions of COVID-19 disease, perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine, factors related to non-vaccination, information sources about the COVID-19 vaccine, and long-term vaccination decisions. There were seven linked sub-themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Overall, participants had a good understanding of COVID-19 disease, but limited knowledge about the vaccine, causing hesitancy to get vaccinated. Reasons for not getting vaccinated included health-related concerns, safety concerns, personal experiences, and social and political factors. Safety and health-related concerns were prevalent, with adverse vaccine outcomes being the most common concern. Most participants had experienced a historic encounter with a vaccine-related death or illness.Contribution: Vaccine hesitancy should be viewed as a powerful concern from the community, and a key source of worry for the health authorities over any vaccine-related doubt.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v66i1.5988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  South Africa faced challenges while implementing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures such as mass vaccination. Some people rejected or were hesitant to receive government-recommended vaccines. This study explored COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among unvaccinated individuals in a primary care setting in Pretoria, South Africa.

Methods:  This was an exploratory phenomenological study that included one-on-one interviews with 12 individuals at Temba Community Health Centre in Pretoria, South Africa.

Results:  The research revealed five themes: perceptions of COVID-19 disease, perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine, factors related to non-vaccination, information sources about the COVID-19 vaccine, and long-term vaccination decisions. There were seven linked sub-themes.

Conclusion:  Overall, participants had a good understanding of COVID-19 disease, but limited knowledge about the vaccine, causing hesitancy to get vaccinated. Reasons for not getting vaccinated included health-related concerns, safety concerns, personal experiences, and social and political factors. Safety and health-related concerns were prevalent, with adverse vaccine outcomes being the most common concern. Most participants had experienced a historic encounter with a vaccine-related death or illness.Contribution: Vaccine hesitancy should be viewed as a powerful concern from the community, and a key source of worry for the health authorities over any vaccine-related doubt.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比勒陀利亚初级保健机构中未接种 COVID-19 疫苗者的犹豫态度。
背景: 南非在实施大规模疫苗接种等冠状病毒疾病 2019 (COVID-19) 措施时面临挑战。一些人拒绝接种政府推荐的疫苗或对接种疫苗犹豫不决。本研究探讨了南非比勒陀利亚初级保健机构中未接种 COVID-19 疫苗者的犹豫不决态度: 这是一项探索性现象学研究,在南非比勒陀利亚的 Temba 社区健康中心对 12 人进行了一对一访谈: 研究揭示了五个主题:对 COVID-19 疾病的看法、对 COVID-19 疫苗的看法、不接种疫苗的相关因素、有关 COVID-19 疫苗的信息来源以及长期接种疫苗的决定。共有七个相关联的次主题: 总体而言,参与者对 COVID-19 疾病有较好的了解,但对疫苗的了解有限,导致他们对接种疫苗犹豫不决。不接种疫苗的原因包括与健康相关的担忧、安全担忧、个人经历以及社会和政治因素。与安全和健康相关的担忧很普遍,而疫苗不良反应是最常见的担忧。大多数参与者都曾经历过与疫苗相关的死亡或疾病:贡献:疫苗犹豫不决应被视为社会的一种强烈担忧,也是卫生当局对任何与疫苗相关的疑虑感到担忧的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
期刊最新文献
Hypertension guideline implementation and blood pressure control in Matlosana, South Africa. The lifestyle factors of medical doctors in academic hospitals, Bloemfontein, Free State. Tobacco use and readiness to treat tobacco users among primary healthcare professionals in Soweto. A review of burnout among doctors in South Africa: Pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Medication adherence in geriatric patients attending medical outpatient department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1