Feasibility of a digital palliative care intervention (Convoy-Pal) for older adults with heart failure and multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers: a waitlist randomized control trial.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01561-w
Lyndsay DeGroot, Riley Gillette, Jennifer Paola Villalobos, Geoffrey Harger, Dylan Thomas Doyle, Sheana Bull, David B Bekelman, Rebecca Boxer, Jean S Kutner, Jennifer D Portz
{"title":"Feasibility of a digital palliative care intervention (Convoy-Pal) for older adults with heart failure and multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers: a waitlist randomized control trial.","authors":"Lyndsay DeGroot, Riley Gillette, Jennifer Paola Villalobos, Geoffrey Harger, Dylan Thomas Doyle, Sheana Bull, David B Bekelman, Rebecca Boxer, Jean S Kutner, Jennifer D Portz","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01561-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although older adults with heart failure (HF) and multiple chronic conditions (MCC) frequently rely on caregivers for health management, digital health systems, such as patient portals and mobile apps, are designed for individual patients and often exclude caregivers. There is a need to develop approaches that integrate caregivers into care. This study tested the feasibility of the Social Convoy Palliative Care intervention (Convoy-Pal), a 12-week digital self-management program that includes assessment tools and resources for clinical palliative care, designed for both patients and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized waitlist control feasibility trial involving patients over 65 years old with MCC who had been hospitalized two or more times for HF in the past 12 months and their caregivers. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate recruitment, retention, missing data, self-reported social functioning, positive aspects of caregiving, and the acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 126 potentially eligible patients, 11 were ineligible and 69 were deceased. Of the 46 eligible patients, 31 enrolled in the trial. Although 48 caregivers were identified, only 15 enrolled. The average age was 76.3 years for patients and 71.6 years for caregivers, with most participants being non-Hispanic White. Notably, 4% did not have access to a personal mobile device or computer. Retention rates were 79% for intervention patients, 57% for intervention caregivers, and 60% for control participants. Only 4.6% of survey subscales were missing, aided by robust technical support. Intervention patients reported improved social functioning (SF-36: 64.6 ± 25.8 to 73.2 ± 31.3) compared to controls (64.6 ± 27.1 to 67.5 ± 24.4). Intervention caregivers also reported increased positive perceptions of caregiving (29.5 ± 5.28 to 35.0 ± 5.35) versus control caregivers (29.4 ± 8.7 to 28.0 ± 4.4). Waitlist control participants who later joined the Convoy-Pal program showed similar improvements. The intervention was well-rated for acceptability, especially regarding the information provided (3.96 ± .57 out of 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recruiting informal caregivers proved challenging. Nonetheless, Convoy-Pal retained patients and collected meaningful self-reported outcomes, showing potential benefits for both patients and caregivers. Given the importance of a patient and caregiver approach in palliative care, further research is needed to design digital tools that cater to multiple simultaneous users.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04779931. Date of registration: March 3, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01561-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although older adults with heart failure (HF) and multiple chronic conditions (MCC) frequently rely on caregivers for health management, digital health systems, such as patient portals and mobile apps, are designed for individual patients and often exclude caregivers. There is a need to develop approaches that integrate caregivers into care. This study tested the feasibility of the Social Convoy Palliative Care intervention (Convoy-Pal), a 12-week digital self-management program that includes assessment tools and resources for clinical palliative care, designed for both patients and their caregivers.

Methods: A randomized waitlist control feasibility trial involving patients over 65 years old with MCC who had been hospitalized two or more times for HF in the past 12 months and their caregivers. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate recruitment, retention, missing data, self-reported social functioning, positive aspects of caregiving, and the acceptability of the intervention.

Results: Of 126 potentially eligible patients, 11 were ineligible and 69 were deceased. Of the 46 eligible patients, 31 enrolled in the trial. Although 48 caregivers were identified, only 15 enrolled. The average age was 76.3 years for patients and 71.6 years for caregivers, with most participants being non-Hispanic White. Notably, 4% did not have access to a personal mobile device or computer. Retention rates were 79% for intervention patients, 57% for intervention caregivers, and 60% for control participants. Only 4.6% of survey subscales were missing, aided by robust technical support. Intervention patients reported improved social functioning (SF-36: 64.6 ± 25.8 to 73.2 ± 31.3) compared to controls (64.6 ± 27.1 to 67.5 ± 24.4). Intervention caregivers also reported increased positive perceptions of caregiving (29.5 ± 5.28 to 35.0 ± 5.35) versus control caregivers (29.4 ± 8.7 to 28.0 ± 4.4). Waitlist control participants who later joined the Convoy-Pal program showed similar improvements. The intervention was well-rated for acceptability, especially regarding the information provided (3.96 ± .57 out of 5).

Conclusions: Recruiting informal caregivers proved challenging. Nonetheless, Convoy-Pal retained patients and collected meaningful self-reported outcomes, showing potential benefits for both patients and caregivers. Given the importance of a patient and caregiver approach in palliative care, further research is needed to design digital tools that cater to multiple simultaneous users.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04779931. Date of registration: March 3, 2021.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对患有心力衰竭和多种慢性疾病的老年人及其护理人员的数字姑息关怀干预(Convoy-Pal)的可行性:候选名单随机对照试验。
背景:尽管患有心力衰竭(HF)和多种慢性疾病(MCC)的老年人经常依赖护理人员进行健康管理,但患者门户网站和移动应用程序等数字健康系统都是为患者个人设计的,往往将护理人员排除在外。因此有必要开发能将护理人员纳入护理的方法。本研究测试了社交康宏姑息治疗干预(Convoy-Pal)的可行性,这是一项为期12周的数字化自我管理计划,其中包括评估工具和临床姑息治疗资源,专为患者及其护理人员设计:这是一项随机候选对照可行性试验,参与者包括65岁以上、在过去12个月中因高血压住院两次或两次以上的MCC患者及其护理人员。使用描述性统计来评估招募、保留、缺失数据、自我报告的社会功能、护理的积极方面以及干预的可接受性:在 126 名可能符合条件的患者中,11 人不符合条件,69 人死亡。在 46 名符合条件的患者中,31 人参加了试验。虽然确定了 48 名护理人员,但只有 15 人参加了试验。患者的平均年龄为 76.3 岁,护理人员的平均年龄为 71.6 岁,大多数参与者为非西班牙裔白人。值得注意的是,有 4% 的人无法使用个人移动设备或电脑。干预患者的保留率为 79%,干预护理人员的保留率为 57%,对照组参与者的保留率为 60%。在强大的技术支持下,只有 4.6% 的调查子量表缺失。与对照组(64.6 ± 27.1 到 67.5 ± 24.4)相比,干预组患者的社会功能有所改善(SF-36:64.6 ± 25.8 到 73.2 ± 31.3)。与对照组的护理人员(29.4 ± 8.7 到 28.0 ± 4.4)相比,干预组护理人员对护理工作的积极看法也有所提高(29.5 ± 5.28 到 35.0 ± 5.35)。后来加入康宏帕尔项目的候补对照组参与者也有类似的改善。干预的可接受性评价良好,尤其是在所提供的信息方面(3.96 ± .57,满分 5 分):结论:招募非正式护理人员具有挑战性。尽管如此,康宏帕尔还是留住了患者,并收集到了有意义的自我报告结果,显示出对患者和护理人员的潜在益处。鉴于患者和护理人员方法在姑息治疗中的重要性,我们需要进一步研究如何设计数字工具来满足多用户同时使用的需求:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04779931。注册日期:2021 年 3 月 3 日:注册日期:2021 年 3 月 3 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Communication about incurable illness and remaining life between spouses and patients with incurable illness receiving specialized home care: effects of a family caregiver-targeted web-based psycho-educational intervention. Correction: Adapting the serious illness conversation guide for unhoused older adults: a rapid qualitative study. Online education in palliative care - A national exploratory multimethod study. The family talk intervention prevent the feeling of loneliness - a long term follow up after a parents life-threatening illness. Is the use of antibiotic stewardship measures in the context of specialized outpatient palliative care sensible and feasible? An interview-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1