Midwives' compliance with post-exposure prophylaxis guidelines in Tshwane District, South Africa.

Mosehle S Matlala, Thanyani G Lumadi
{"title":"Midwives' compliance with post-exposure prophylaxis guidelines in Tshwane District, South Africa.","authors":"Mosehle S Matlala, Thanyani G Lumadi","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a major public health concern. Midwifery practitioners as frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) remain susceptible to occupational exposure to infections while performing their routine duties. It is estimated that 90% of occupational exposures occur because of a lack of awareness and training regarding prevention and measures to be taken in case of accidental exposure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and compliance of midwifery practitioners regarding post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> Concurrent mixed-methods research approach with qualitative nested in quantitative design was followed. A random simple sampling technique was used to collect quantitative data from 71 midwifery practitioners. Simultaneously, a purposive non-probability sampling technique was used for the qualitative approach with two occupational health and safety (OHS) practitioners and 13 midwifery practitioners. Data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS version 24 and presented in tables and figures, and thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative strand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The midwifery practitioners have good knowledge about PEP for HIV. However, the study revealed the underreporting of accidental exposures to blood and body fluids (BBFs) and the underutilisation of available PEP services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Maternity units are high-risk clinical environments. Underreporting of incidents of exposure remains prevalent among midwifery practitioners.Contribution: The findings will inform policy development structures and hospital management regarding knowledge and implementation gaps related to PEP guidelines in the specific hospitals. Strategies to improve compliance with PEP among midwifery practitioners were developed as a derivative from study findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93959,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"47 1","pages":"e1-e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v47i1.2548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a major public health concern. Midwifery practitioners as frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) remain susceptible to occupational exposure to infections while performing their routine duties. It is estimated that 90% of occupational exposures occur because of a lack of awareness and training regarding prevention and measures to be taken in case of accidental exposure.

Objectives:  The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and compliance of midwifery practitioners regarding post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) guidelines.

Method:  Concurrent mixed-methods research approach with qualitative nested in quantitative design was followed. A random simple sampling technique was used to collect quantitative data from 71 midwifery practitioners. Simultaneously, a purposive non-probability sampling technique was used for the qualitative approach with two occupational health and safety (OHS) practitioners and 13 midwifery practitioners. Data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS version 24 and presented in tables and figures, and thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative strand.

Results:  The midwifery practitioners have good knowledge about PEP for HIV. However, the study revealed the underreporting of accidental exposures to blood and body fluids (BBFs) and the underutilisation of available PEP services.

Conclusion:  Maternity units are high-risk clinical environments. Underreporting of incidents of exposure remains prevalent among midwifery practitioners.Contribution: The findings will inform policy development structures and hospital management regarding knowledge and implementation gaps related to PEP guidelines in the specific hospitals. Strategies to improve compliance with PEP among midwifery practitioners were developed as a derivative from study findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非 Tshwane 地区助产士对暴露后预防指南的遵守情况。
背景: 人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题。助产士作为前线医护人员(HCWs),在履行日常职责时仍然很容易受到职业感染。据估计,90%的职业暴露发生的原因是缺乏有关预防和意外暴露时应采取的措施的意识和培训: 本研究旨在评估助产士对暴露后预防(PEP)指南的了解、态度和遵守情况: 方法:采用定性嵌套定量的并行混合研究方法。采用随机简单抽样技术从 71 名助产士中收集定量数据。同时,在定性方法中采用了有目的的非概率抽样技术,抽取了两名职业健康与安全(OHS)从业人员和 13 名助产士。数据通过问卷调查和半结构化访谈收集。定量数据采用 SPSS 24 版进行分析,并以表格和数字的形式呈现,定性数据则采用主题分析法: 结果:助产士对艾滋病毒的 PEP 有很好的了解。然而,研究显示,意外暴露于血液和体液(BBFs)的情况报告不足,现有的 PEP 服务利用不足: 结论:产科是高风险的临床环境。贡献:贡献: 研究结果将为政策制定机构和医院管理层提供信息,帮助他们了解特定医院中与 PEP 指南相关的知识和实施差距。作为研究结果的衍生品,还制定了提高助产从业人员遵守 PEP 的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nurse managers on healthy environments for adolescents living with intellectual disabilities. Midwives' experiences regarding recordkeeping during intrapartum care in Limpopo Province healthcare facilities. A conceptual framework for psychiatric nurses to facilitate medication compliance among adults living with depression. Impact of anxiety-related conditions on nursing students' academic excellence. Newly qualified primary care nurses' preparedness to make sound clinical judgements in practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1