Cannabis-related information sources among US residents: A probability-weighted nationally representative survey.

IF 4.1 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of cannabis research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s42238-024-00249-5
Kevin F Boehnke, Tristin Smith, Michael R Elliott, Adrianne R Wilson-Poe, Daniel J Kruger
{"title":"Cannabis-related information sources among US residents: A probability-weighted nationally representative survey.","authors":"Kevin F Boehnke, Tristin Smith, Michael R Elliott, Adrianne R Wilson-Poe, Daniel J Kruger","doi":"10.1186/s42238-024-00249-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Department of Health and Human Services recently recommended rescheduling cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III, which might have broad effects on public health outcomes related to cannabis. In this changing environment, understanding national patterns in how people obtain information about cannabis is critical to informing public health outreach and education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed American adults (≥ 18 years) between June 22nd-26th, 2023 using the AmeriSpeak panel. We assessed past year cannabis use, intentions for cannabis use, and where participants got their information about cannabis. We investigated differences by past year use and explored associations between demographic and cannabis use characteristics with information sources using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 1,161) were 48.3±27.3 years of age (mean±standard deviation), 51% female, and 27% reported past year cannabis use. The most common information sources used were friends/family (35.6%) and websites (33.7%), while the least common information sources were health/medical care providers (9.3%), employees at place of purchase (8.6%), and government agencies (4.7%). Past year cannabis use was positively associated with all information sources except government agencies and popular media articles. A higher proportion of those using cannabis medically (with or without recreational use) obtained information from a healthcare provider (16.4% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As cannabis accessibility increases and legality continues changing, there is a strong need for better clinician education, improved public health outreach, and improved communication between patients and clinicians about cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":"6 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-024-00249-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Department of Health and Human Services recently recommended rescheduling cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III, which might have broad effects on public health outcomes related to cannabis. In this changing environment, understanding national patterns in how people obtain information about cannabis is critical to informing public health outreach and education.

Methods: We surveyed American adults (≥ 18 years) between June 22nd-26th, 2023 using the AmeriSpeak panel. We assessed past year cannabis use, intentions for cannabis use, and where participants got their information about cannabis. We investigated differences by past year use and explored associations between demographic and cannabis use characteristics with information sources using logistic regression.

Results: Participants (n = 1,161) were 48.3±27.3 years of age (mean±standard deviation), 51% female, and 27% reported past year cannabis use. The most common information sources used were friends/family (35.6%) and websites (33.7%), while the least common information sources were health/medical care providers (9.3%), employees at place of purchase (8.6%), and government agencies (4.7%). Past year cannabis use was positively associated with all information sources except government agencies and popular media articles. A higher proportion of those using cannabis medically (with or without recreational use) obtained information from a healthcare provider (16.4% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.006).

Conclusions: As cannabis accessibility increases and legality continues changing, there is a strong need for better clinician education, improved public health outreach, and improved communication between patients and clinicians about cannabis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国居民中与大麻有关的信息来源:一项概率加权的全国代表性调查。
导言:美国卫生与公众服务部最近建议将大麻从附表一调整为附表三,这可能会对与大麻有关的公众健康结果产生广泛影响。在这种不断变化的环境中,了解人们如何获取有关大麻信息的全国模式对于公共健康宣传和教育至关重要:我们在 2023 年 6 月 22 日至 26 日期间使用 AmeriSpeak 小组对美国成年人(≥ 18 岁)进行了调查。我们评估了过去一年的大麻使用情况、大麻使用意向以及参与者从何处获得大麻信息。我们调查了过去一年使用情况的差异,并使用逻辑回归法探讨了人口特征和大麻使用特征与信息来源之间的关联:参与者(n = 1,161)的年龄为 48.3±27.3 岁(平均值±标准差),51% 为女性,27% 报告过去一年使用过大麻。最常见的信息来源是朋友/家人(35.6%)和网站(33.7%),最少见的信息来源是健康/医疗保健提供者(9.3%)、购买场所员工(8.6%)和政府机构(4.7%)。除政府机构和大众媒体文章外,上一年的大麻使用情况与所有信息来源均呈正相关。医疗使用大麻(无论是否娱乐使用)者中有较高比例的人从医疗保健提供者处获得信息(16.4% 对 5.2%,p = 0.006):结论:随着大麻可获得性的增加和合法性的不断变化,亟需加强临床医生教育、改善公共卫生宣传以及改善患者和临床医生之间关于大麻的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of the current ongoing clinical trials exploring the possible anti-anxiety effects of cannabidiol. Association between cannabis use and physical activity in the United States based on legalization and health status. Cannabis-related information sources among US residents: A probability-weighted nationally representative survey. Attitudes toward driving after cannabis use: a systematic review. Changes in health-related quality of life over the first three months of medical marijuana use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1