Susan Park, Robert Marcotte, John Staudenmayer, John Sirard, Nicole VanKim, Penelope Pekow, Scott Strath, Patty Freedson, Lisa Chasan-Taber
{"title":"Validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (PPAQ-SF).","authors":"Susan Park, Robert Marcotte, John Staudenmayer, John Sirard, Nicole VanKim, Penelope Pekow, Scott Strath, Patty Freedson, Lisa Chasan-Taber","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To develop and evaluate the validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (PPAQ-SF). A prospective cohort of participants (N=50) completed the updated PPAQ (long-form) and wore an ActiGraph for 7 days on the nondominant wrist in early, mid, and late pregnancy. The top ten questions with the highest relative contribution to the between-person variance in PPAQ-assessed total MET-hours/day were selected. Internal validity was evaluated using the ActiGraph and the updated PPAQ (long-form) within the current dataset. Validity was also assessed in an external validation dataset of 222 pregnant participants using the updated and original PPAQ (long-forms). Spearman correlations between the PPAQ-SF and ActiGraph estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were r = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for overall pregnancy and ranged from 0.21 (95% CI -0.07-0.47) in early pregnancy to 0.49 (95% CI 0.23-0.69) in mid-pregnancy. In the external validation dataset, correlations between the PPAQ-SF and the PPAQ (long forms) estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were statistically significant across pregnancy (r=0.94-0.99). Reproducibility ranged from 0.35 in early pregnancy to 0.77 in mid pregnancy. In summary, the PPAQ-SF can provide a time-efficient measure of MVPA during pregnancy with acceptable validity; reproducibility was reasonable in mid-pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To develop and evaluate the validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (PPAQ-SF). A prospective cohort of participants (N=50) completed the updated PPAQ (long-form) and wore an ActiGraph for 7 days on the nondominant wrist in early, mid, and late pregnancy. The top ten questions with the highest relative contribution to the between-person variance in PPAQ-assessed total MET-hours/day were selected. Internal validity was evaluated using the ActiGraph and the updated PPAQ (long-form) within the current dataset. Validity was also assessed in an external validation dataset of 222 pregnant participants using the updated and original PPAQ (long-forms). Spearman correlations between the PPAQ-SF and ActiGraph estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were r = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for overall pregnancy and ranged from 0.21 (95% CI -0.07-0.47) in early pregnancy to 0.49 (95% CI 0.23-0.69) in mid-pregnancy. In the external validation dataset, correlations between the PPAQ-SF and the PPAQ (long forms) estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were statistically significant across pregnancy (r=0.94-0.99). Reproducibility ranged from 0.35 in early pregnancy to 0.77 in mid pregnancy. In summary, the PPAQ-SF can provide a time-efficient measure of MVPA during pregnancy with acceptable validity; reproducibility was reasonable in mid-pregnancy.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research.
It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.