Effect of the Green Cross method on patient safety culture in a postanaesthesia care unit: a longitudinal quasi-experimental study.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002964
Gørill Helen Birkeli, Owen Matthew Truscott Thomas, Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås, Randi Ballangrud, Anne Karin Lindahl
{"title":"Effect of the Green Cross method on patient safety culture in a postanaesthesia care unit: a longitudinal quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Gørill Helen Birkeli, Owen Matthew Truscott Thomas, Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås, Randi Ballangrud, Anne Karin Lindahl","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitals should adopt multiple methods to monitor incidents for a comprehensive review of the types of incidents that occur. Contrary to traditional incident reporting systems, the Green Cross (GC) method is a simple visual method to recognise incidents based on teamwork and safety briefings. Its longitudinal effect on patient safety culture has not been previously assessed. This study aimed to explore whether the implementation of the GC method in a postanaesthesia care unit changed nurses' perceptions of different factors associated with patient safety culture over 4 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal quasi-experimental pre-post intervention design with a comparison group was used. The intervention unit and the comparison group, which consisted of nurses, were recruited from the surgical department of a Norwegian university hospital. The intervention unit implemented the GC method in February 2019. Both groups responded to the staff survey before and then annually between 2019 and 2022 on the factors 'work engagement', 'teamwork climate' and 'safety climate'. The data were analysed using logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the intervention unit, relative to the changes in the comparison group, the results indicated significant large positive changes in all factor scores in 2019, no changes in 2020, significant large positive changes in 'work engagement' and 'safety climate' scores in 2021 and a significant medium positive change in 'work engagement' in 2022. At baseline, the comparison group had a significantly lower score in 'safety climate' than the intervention unit, but no significant baseline differences were found between the groups regarding 'work engagement' and 'teamwork climate'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the GC method had a positive effect on the nurses' perception of factors associated with patient safety culture over a period of 4 years. The positive effect was completely sustained in 'work engagement' but was somewhat less persistent in 'teamwork climate' and 'safety climate'.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitals should adopt multiple methods to monitor incidents for a comprehensive review of the types of incidents that occur. Contrary to traditional incident reporting systems, the Green Cross (GC) method is a simple visual method to recognise incidents based on teamwork and safety briefings. Its longitudinal effect on patient safety culture has not been previously assessed. This study aimed to explore whether the implementation of the GC method in a postanaesthesia care unit changed nurses' perceptions of different factors associated with patient safety culture over 4 years.

Methods: A longitudinal quasi-experimental pre-post intervention design with a comparison group was used. The intervention unit and the comparison group, which consisted of nurses, were recruited from the surgical department of a Norwegian university hospital. The intervention unit implemented the GC method in February 2019. Both groups responded to the staff survey before and then annually between 2019 and 2022 on the factors 'work engagement', 'teamwork climate' and 'safety climate'. The data were analysed using logistic regression models.

Results: Within the intervention unit, relative to the changes in the comparison group, the results indicated significant large positive changes in all factor scores in 2019, no changes in 2020, significant large positive changes in 'work engagement' and 'safety climate' scores in 2021 and a significant medium positive change in 'work engagement' in 2022. At baseline, the comparison group had a significantly lower score in 'safety climate' than the intervention unit, but no significant baseline differences were found between the groups regarding 'work engagement' and 'teamwork climate'.

Conclusion: The results suggest that the GC method had a positive effect on the nurses' perception of factors associated with patient safety culture over a period of 4 years. The positive effect was completely sustained in 'work engagement' but was somewhat less persistent in 'teamwork climate' and 'safety climate'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿十字方法对麻醉后护理病房患者安全文化的影响:一项纵向准实验研究。
背景:医院应采用多种方法监测事故,以全面审查发生的事故类型。与传统的事故报告系统不同,绿十字(GC)方法是一种基于团队合作和安全简报的简单可视化事故识别方法。此前尚未对其对患者安全文化的纵向影响进行过评估。本研究旨在探讨在麻醉后护理病房实施 GC 方法是否会在 4 年内改变护士对与患者安全文化相关的不同因素的看法:采用纵向准实验前-后干预设计,并设对比组。干预组和对比组均由挪威一所大学医院外科的护士组成。干预组于 2019 年 2 月实施了 GC 方法。在此之前,两组人员都对 "工作参与度"、"团队合作氛围 "和 "安全氛围 "等因素进行了员工调查,并在 2019 年至 2022 年期间每年进行一次调查。数据采用逻辑回归模型进行分析:在干预组内,相对于对比组的变化,结果显示 2019 年所有因子得分都有显著的大幅正向变化,2020 年没有变化,2021 年 "工作投入度 "和 "安全氛围 "得分有显著的大幅正向变化,2022 年 "工作投入度 "有显著的中度正向变化。在基线上,对比组的 "安全氛围 "得分明显低于干预组,但在 "工作投入 "和 "团队合作氛围 "方面,两组之间没有发现明显的基线差异:结果表明,在 4 年的时间里,GC 方法对护士对患者安全文化相关因素的认知产生了积极影响。这种积极影响在 "工作投入 "方面完全持续,但在 "团队合作氛围 "和 "安全氛围 "方面的持续性稍差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life. Community breast pain clinics can provide safe, quality care for women presenting with breast pain. Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1