Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II): multicentre, outcome assessor-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to Descemet stripping only (DSO) with adjunctive ripasudil for Fuchs dystrophy.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001725
Charles C Lin, Winston Chamberlain, Beth Ann Benetz, William Gensheimer, Jennifer Y Li, Bennie H Jeng, Jameson Clover, Nicole Varnado, Sarah Abdelrahman, Amrita Srinivasan, Zeba A Syed, Ellen H Koo, Benjamin F Arnold, Thomas M Lietman, Jonathan Lass, Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
{"title":"Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II): multicentre, outcome assessor-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to Descemet stripping only (DSO) with adjunctive ripasudil for Fuchs dystrophy.","authors":"Charles C Lin, Winston Chamberlain, Beth Ann Benetz, William Gensheimer, Jennifer Y Li, Bennie H Jeng, Jameson Clover, Nicole Varnado, Sarah Abdelrahman, Amrita Srinivasan, Zeba A Syed, Ellen H Koo, Benjamin F Arnold, Thomas M Lietman, Jonathan Lass, Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It remains uncertain whether Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet stripping only (DSO) yields better outcomes in patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial comparing DMEK to DSO with ripasudil (DSO-R) for this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A total of 60 patients with endothelial dysfunction due to symptomatic FECD will be enrolled from seven participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-DMEK plus topical placebo and group 2-DSO plus topical ripasudil 0.4%. The enrolment period is 24 months. The primary outcome is best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central endothelial cell density, visual acuity, vision-related quality of life and Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography. Study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, endothelial failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. DETECT II aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of DMEK and DSO-R. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising the treatment of FECD, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>A data and safety monitoring committee has been empanelled by the National Eye Institute. All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record. This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05275972.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It remains uncertain whether Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet stripping only (DSO) yields better outcomes in patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial comparing DMEK to DSO with ripasudil (DSO-R) for this patient population.

Methods and analysis: A total of 60 patients with endothelial dysfunction due to symptomatic FECD will be enrolled from seven participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-DMEK plus topical placebo and group 2-DSO plus topical ripasudil 0.4%. The enrolment period is 24 months. The primary outcome is best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central endothelial cell density, visual acuity, vision-related quality of life and Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography. Study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, endothelial failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. DETECT II aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of DMEK and DSO-R. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising the treatment of FECD, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation.

Ethics and dissemination: A data and safety monitoring committee has been empanelled by the National Eye Institute. All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record. This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request.

Trial registration number: NCT05275972.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Descemet 内皮厚度比较试验 II (DETECTⅡ):多中心、结果评估者掩蔽、安慰剂对照试验,比较 Descemet 膜内皮角膜移植术 (DMEK) 和单纯 Descemet 剥脱术 (DSO),并辅以里帕斯地尔治疗 Fuchs 营养不良症。
导言:对于有症状的福氏内皮角膜营养不良症(FECD)患者来说,究竟是去角膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)还是单纯去角膜剥离术(DSO)能产生更好的疗效,目前仍不确定。本文介绍了德赛马内皮厚度比较试验 II(DETECT II)的方案,这是一项多中心、结果掩蔽、随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验,比较了针对这一患者群体的 DMEK 和含瑞帕舒地尔的 DSO(DSO-R):美国 7 个参与研究的机构将共招募 60 名因症状性 FECD 而导致内皮功能障碍的患者。这些患者将按 1:1 的比例随机分配到以下治疗组中:第 1 组--DMEK 加外用安慰剂;第 2 组--DSO 加外用 0.4% 利帕斯地尔。注册期为 24 个月。主要结果是 12 个月时的最佳眼镜矫正视力。次要结果包括外周和中央内皮细胞密度、视力、视力相关生活质量和 Pentacam Scheimpflug 层析成像。研究结果将采用混合效应线性回归法进行分析。不良事件,包括重泡程序、内皮失效和移植物排斥反应,将被记录下来,并使用适当的统计方法进行分析。DETECT II旨在为DMEK和DSO-R的有效性比较提供证据。该试验的结果将有助于优化 FECD 的治疗,同时还将探讨这些干预措施的成本效益。通过同行评议出版物和国内/国际会议传播研究结果将促进知识转化,并指导角膜移植领域的临床实践:国家眼科研究所已授权成立一个数据和安全监测委员会。所有研究方案均需经过 WCG IRB(作为唯一备案的 IRB)的审查和批准。本研究将遵守美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的数据共享政策、NIH 资助的临床试验信息传播政策以及临床试验注册和结果信息提交规则。试验数据将在合理要求下提供:试验注册号:NCT05275972。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of choroidal vascular alterations in eyes with myopia using ultrawidefield optical coherence tomography angiography. Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence in age-related macular degeneration. Network-based hub biomarker discovery for glaucoma. Investigating the effects of simulated high altitude on colour discrimination. Total retinal thickness is an important factor in evaluating diabetic retinal neurodegeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1