Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1177/02692155241274718
Danilo Armbrust, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Carlos Luques Fonseca, Fernando Zanela da Silva Arêas, Natália de Almeida Carvalho Duarte, Silvia Ataíde Alves Santana, Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont, Hugo Pasin Neto, Claudia Santos Oliveira
{"title":"Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Danilo Armbrust, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Carlos Luques Fonseca, Fernando Zanela da Silva Arêas, Natália de Almeida Carvalho Duarte, Silvia Ataíde Alves Santana, Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont, Hugo Pasin Neto, Claudia Santos Oliveira","doi":"10.1177/02692155241274718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing pain, disability, and improving quality of life in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomised double-blind clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical outpatient unit.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>72 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomised into three groups: active tDCS + OMT (<i>n</i> = 24), sham tDCS + sham OMT (<i>n</i> = 24), and sham tDCS + OMT (<i>n</i> = 24).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Evaluations were performed before, after the intervention, and one month post-intervention. tDCS consisted of ten 20-minute sessions over two weeks (five sessions per week). OMT was administered once per week, with two sessions conducted before the first and sixth tDCS sessions.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Pain, disability, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and at one month of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visual analogue scale showed a significant decrease in all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT demonstrated a clinically significant reduction compared to the sham combination (effect size <i>n</i>² = 0.315). Roland-Morris scores decreased across all groups without specific group effects. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level improvement was observed only in the tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT groups (significant difference between T2 and T0, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of OMT and tDCS did not provide clinically significant improvement over OMT alone in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1609-1621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241274718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing pain, disability, and improving quality of life in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.

Design: A randomised double-blind clinical trial.

Setting: Clinical outpatient unit.

Subjects: 72 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomised into three groups: active tDCS + OMT (n = 24), sham tDCS + sham OMT (n = 24), and sham tDCS + OMT (n = 24).

Interventions: Evaluations were performed before, after the intervention, and one month post-intervention. tDCS consisted of ten 20-minute sessions over two weeks (five sessions per week). OMT was administered once per week, with two sessions conducted before the first and sixth tDCS sessions.

Main measures: Pain, disability, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and at one month of follow-up.

Results: The visual analogue scale showed a significant decrease in all groups (p < 0.001). However, tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT demonstrated a clinically significant reduction compared to the sham combination (effect size n² = 0.315). Roland-Morris scores decreased across all groups without specific group effects. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level improvement was observed only in the tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT groups (significant difference between T2 and T0, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The combination of OMT and tDCS did not provide clinically significant improvement over OMT alone in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅直流电刺激对慢性腰背痛患者的整骨疗法效果:双盲、随机安慰剂对照试验。
目的评估经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合整骨疗法(OMT)在减轻非特异性慢性腰背痛患者疼痛、残疾和提高生活质量方面的效果:随机双盲临床试验:研究对象:72 名非特异性慢性腰背痛患者:72名患有非特异性慢性腰背痛的参与者被随机分为三组:主动tDCS+OMT(n=24)、假tDCS+假OMT(n=24)和假tDCS+OMT(n=24):干预前、干预后和干预后一个月进行评估。tDCS 包括两周内 10 次 20 分钟的治疗(每周 5 次)。OMT 每周进行一次,其中两次在第一次和第六次 tDCS 治疗之前进行:在基线、两周后和一个月的随访中对疼痛、残疾和生活质量进行评估:所有组的视觉模拟量表都显示疼痛明显减轻(p < 0.001)。然而,与假组合相比,tDCS + OMT 和假 tDCS + OMT 显示出明显的临床减轻效果(效应大小 n² = 0.315)。罗兰-莫里斯评分在所有组别中均有所下降,无特定组别效应。仅在 tDCS + OMT 组和假 tDCS + OMT 组观察到 EuroQoL 5 维度 3 级改善(T2 和 T0 之间差异显著,p = 0.002):结论:对非特异性慢性腰背痛患者而言,OMT 和 tDCS 的联合治疗与单独使用 OMT 相比,并不能带来显著的临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1