Participation Preferences in Cognitive Treatments Among Youth With Mental Illness: Findings From the Your Mind, Your Choice Survey.

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Early Intervention in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1111/eip.13615

Shayden Bryce, Nicholas Cheng, Alexandra Stainton, Isabel Zbukvic, Alex Dalton, Angelica Ojinnaka, Aswin Ratheesh, Chris O'Halloran, Jacquie Uren, Jesse Gates, Rothanthi Daglas-Georgiou, Stephen Wood, Kelly Allott

{"title":"Participation Preferences in Cognitive Treatments Among Youth With Mental Illness: Findings From the Your Mind, Your Choice Survey.","authors":"Shayden Bryce, Nicholas Cheng, Alexandra Stainton, Isabel Zbukvic, Alex Dalton, Angelica Ojinnaka, Aswin Ratheesh, Chris O'Halloran, Jacquie Uren, Jesse Gates, Rothanthi Daglas-Georgiou, Stephen Wood, Kelly Allott","doi":"10.1111/eip.13615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To explore the cognitive treatment preferences of young people with mental illness.Methods: Two-hundred and fourteen people, aged 12-25 years, were surveyed about their treatment priorities. Participants were specifically asked how they might like to receive cognitive treatments and identify factors that might influence their decisions to participate.Results: Over half of the participants indicated that they would like to receive treatment face-to-face, in a one-on-one setting, with a treatment focus on both deficits and strengths, or without involvement from friends or family when asked about each preference individually. However, only 11% of people wanted all four of these preferences combined. Treatment cost, effectiveness, therapeutic relationships, and accessibility were the most frequently identified factors that could influence perceived decisions to participate.Conclusions: The cognitive treatment preferences of young people are variable. Supports focusing on both cognitive strengths and deficits were a novel finding and warrants further attention within existing treatment frameworks.","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore the cognitive treatment preferences of young people with mental illness.

Methods: Two-hundred and fourteen people, aged 12-25 years, were surveyed about their treatment priorities. Participants were specifically asked how they might like to receive cognitive treatments and identify factors that might influence their decisions to participate.

Results: Over half of the participants indicated that they would like to receive treatment face-to-face, in a one-on-one setting, with a treatment focus on both deficits and strengths, or without involvement from friends or family when asked about each preference individually. However, only 11% of people wanted all four of these preferences combined. Treatment cost, effectiveness, therapeutic relationships, and accessibility were the most frequently identified factors that could influence perceived decisions to participate.

Conclusions: The cognitive treatment preferences of young people are variable. Supports focusing on both cognitive strengths and deficits were a novel finding and warrants further attention within existing treatment frameworks.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

患有精神疾病的青少年对认知治疗的参与偏好：你的想法，你的选择调查》的结果。

目的：探讨患有精神疾病的年轻人对认知治疗的偏好：对 214 名年龄在 12-25 岁之间的患者进行了有关其治疗优先事项的调查。结果：超过半数的参与者表示，他们希望接受认知治疗：结果：当被问及每种偏好时，超过半数的参与者表示，他们希望接受面对面、一对一的治疗，治疗重点是缺陷和优势，或者没有朋友或家人的参与。然而，只有 11% 的人希望将上述四种偏好结合起来。治疗费用、有效性、治疗关系和可及性是最常被发现的可能影响参与决定的因素：青少年的认知治疗偏好各不相同。同时关注认知优势和缺陷的支持是一项新发现，值得在现有治疗框架内进一步关注。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

5.00%

发文量

112

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.