Scoring Criteria for Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: Utility, Merits, and Demerits.

IF 1.9 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Indian Dermatology Online Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.4103/idoj.idoj_611_23
Henry Tseng, Corey Stone, Dédée F Murrell
{"title":"Scoring Criteria for Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: Utility, Merits, and Demerits.","authors":"Henry Tseng, Corey Stone, Dédée F Murrell","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_611_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scoring systems play a crucial role in dermatology by providing objective measurements of disease severity, treatment efficacy, and outcome comparisons. In autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs), standardized scoring systems are essential for accurate evaluations; however, there is currently a lack of consensus on scoring methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This literature review explores scoring systems in AIBDs by tracing their development, addressing challenges, and highlighting their role in defining endpoints, regulatory considerations, and clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Existing scoring systems for AIBDs, such as the Pemphigus Disease Area Index, Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score, Pemphigus Oral Lesions Intensity Score, Oral Disease Severity Score, and Pemphigus Vulgaris Activity Score, are examined for their validity, reliability, and responsiveness. The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index for bullous pemphigoid is also discussed. The concept of minimal clinically important differences is explored to determine clinically significant improvements in disease severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the central role of scoring systems in dermatology and their implications for research and clinical practice in AIBDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_611_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Scoring systems play a crucial role in dermatology by providing objective measurements of disease severity, treatment efficacy, and outcome comparisons. In autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs), standardized scoring systems are essential for accurate evaluations; however, there is currently a lack of consensus on scoring methods.

Objective: This literature review explores scoring systems in AIBDs by tracing their development, addressing challenges, and highlighting their role in defining endpoints, regulatory considerations, and clinical trials.

Materials and methods: Existing scoring systems for AIBDs, such as the Pemphigus Disease Area Index, Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score, Pemphigus Oral Lesions Intensity Score, Oral Disease Severity Score, and Pemphigus Vulgaris Activity Score, are examined for their validity, reliability, and responsiveness. The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index for bullous pemphigoid is also discussed. The concept of minimal clinically important differences is explored to determine clinically significant improvements in disease severity.

Conclusion: This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the central role of scoring systems in dermatology and their implications for research and clinical practice in AIBDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自身免疫性红斑疾病的评分标准:实用性、优点和缺点。
背景:评分系统通过对疾病严重程度、治疗效果和结果比较进行客观测量,在皮肤病学中发挥着至关重要的作用。在自身免疫性水疱病(AIBDs)中,标准化评分系统对于准确评估至关重要;然而,目前在评分方法上还缺乏共识:本文献综述通过追溯AIBD评分系统的发展历程、探讨其面临的挑战以及强调其在终点定义、监管考虑和临床试验中的作用,对AIBD评分系统进行了探讨:研究了现有的AIBD评分系统,如丘疹性天疱疮疾病面积指数、自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病强度评分、丘疹性天疱疮口腔病变强度评分、口腔疾病严重程度评分和丘疹性天疱疮活动度评分,以了解其有效性、可靠性和响应性。此外,还讨论了针对大疱性类天疱疮的大疱性类天疱疮疾病面积指数。此外,还探讨了最小临床重要差异的概念,以确定疾病严重程度是否有显著的临床改善:本综述全面介绍了评分系统在皮肤病学中的核心作用及其对 AIBD 研究和临床实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
201
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bicalutamide in Dermatology: A Narrative Review. Clinicopathological Profile of Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A 10-Year Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Center in South India. Novel Inflammatory Markers Associated With Cutaneous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis Etiology. Pediatric Basidiobolomycosis: An Uncommon and Misdiagnosed Entity. Premature Graying of Hair: A Comprehensive Review and Recent Insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1