Maaike Wulfse, Mats T Vervoorn, Jantijn J G J Amelink, Elisa M Ballan, Saskia C A de Jager, Joost P G Sluijter, Pieter A Doevendans, Peter-Paul M Zwetsloot, Niels P Van der Kaaij
{"title":"Past Trends and Future Directions of Cardiac Regenerative Medicine - A Systematic Analysis of Clinical Trial Registries.","authors":"Maaike Wulfse, Mats T Vervoorn, Jantijn J G J Amelink, Elisa M Ballan, Saskia C A de Jager, Joost P G Sluijter, Pieter A Doevendans, Peter-Paul M Zwetsloot, Niels P Van der Kaaij","doi":"10.1007/s12265-024-10563-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cell therapy, gene therapy, and tissue engineering have been explored as potential strategies to repair or regenerate damaged cardiac tissue. Despite the presence of encouraging preclinical data, clinical trials of regenerative cardiac therapies have yielded mixed results. Our study aimed to investigate the fate of all registered clinical trials within regenerative cardiac medicine, with the purpose of exploring the potential role of publication bias (or trial-completion bias), how published and unpublished research affects the field, and to draw lessons and recommendations for future clinical trials. In this analysis, we show that only a third of all registered trials has yielded results and that a significant number of trials are not completed. Furthermore, we identified significant heterogeneity in study design, study phase, funding, specific therapies used, primary outcome measures and methods of outcome assessment. These observations might hinder the successful translation of cardiac regenerative therapies into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-024-10563-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cell therapy, gene therapy, and tissue engineering have been explored as potential strategies to repair or regenerate damaged cardiac tissue. Despite the presence of encouraging preclinical data, clinical trials of regenerative cardiac therapies have yielded mixed results. Our study aimed to investigate the fate of all registered clinical trials within regenerative cardiac medicine, with the purpose of exploring the potential role of publication bias (or trial-completion bias), how published and unpublished research affects the field, and to draw lessons and recommendations for future clinical trials. In this analysis, we show that only a third of all registered trials has yielded results and that a significant number of trials are not completed. Furthermore, we identified significant heterogeneity in study design, study phase, funding, specific therapies used, primary outcome measures and methods of outcome assessment. These observations might hinder the successful translation of cardiac regenerative therapies into clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research (JCTR) is a premier journal in cardiovascular translational research.
JCTR is the journal of choice for authors seeking the broadest audience for emerging technologies, therapies and diagnostics, pre-clinical research, and first-in-man clinical trials.
JCTR''s intent is to provide a forum for critical evaluation of the novel cardiovascular science, to showcase important and clinically relevant aspects of the new research, as well as to discuss the impediments that may need to be overcome during the translation to patient care.