Extended vs. Traditional Operating Table in C-Arm-Guided Percutaneous Balloon Compression of the Gasserian Ganglion for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Fengyun You, Ri Chen, Meirong Chen, Xueru Xu, Ruohan You, Xiu Jiang, Huake Zeng
{"title":"Extended vs. Traditional Operating Table in C-Arm-Guided Percutaneous Balloon Compression of the Gasserian Ganglion for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Fengyun You, Ri Chen, Meirong Chen, Xueru Xu, Ruohan You, Xiu Jiang, Huake Zeng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The degree of cervical extension required during percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of the Gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) varies among patients, but the traditional operating tables often fail to fulfil each patient's individual requirements.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of an extended operating table to that of a traditional operating table in C-arm-guided PBC of the Gasserian ganglion for TN.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a consecutively prospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fujian Provincial Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consecutively enrolled patients with TN who were scheduled for PBC of the Gasserian ganglion between February 2020 and February 2023. Some patients who underwent the procedure were placed on an extended operating table, whereas others were placed on a traditional operating table. The primary outcome was the duration of the cervical extension. The secondary outcomes included the duration of patient positioning, operation duration, C-arm radiation exposure, and pressure pain threshold of the bilateral trapezius, levator scapulae, and upper trapezius muscles, as well as the occurrence rate of postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients (mean age of 53.18 ± 2.74 years old, 44 men) were enrolled, with 38 patients using the extended operating table. The baseline characteristics between the extended and traditional operating table groups were comparable (P > 0.05). The duration of the cervical extension was significantly shorter in patients who used an extended operating table than in those who used a traditional operating table (58.77 ± 2.11 vs. 76.49 ± 2.16, P < 0.001). Patients who used an extended operating table exhibited significantly shorter positioning time (3.40 ± 0.45 vs. 10.32 ± 0.66, P < 0.001), operation duration (50.88 ± 2.95 vs. 76.49 ± 2.16, P = 0.020), and C-arm radiation exposure (8.71 ± 1.06 vs. 10.87 ± 1.26, P < 0.001) and significantly higher postoperative 24-hour pressure pain thresholds of the bilateral trapezius muscle (left: 274.39 ± 10.42 vs. 187.05 ± 6.19, P < 0.001; right: 272.89 ± 11.62 vs. 185.42 ± 6.88, P < 0.001), bilateral levator scapulae (left: 357.71 ± 11.37 vs. 245.34 ± 12.87, P < 0.001; right: 353.71 ± 14.14 vs. 245.05 ± 13.20, P < 0.001), and bilateral upper trapezius (left: 253.63 ± 10.91 vs. 163.95 ± 8.44, P < 0.001; right: 255.66 ± 11.99 vs. 165.32 ± 7.93, P < 0.001) compared to those who used a traditional operating table. The occurrence of postoperative adverse events, such as headache, neck pain, back pain, and limb numbness, was significantly lower in the extended operating table group (2.63% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.047) than in the traditional operating table group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This is a single-center study with a small, homogeneous sample, limiting the generalizability of findings; the absence of randomization raises concerns about potential bias; long-term follow-up and recurrence rate measurements were lacking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that the extended operating table may be an alternative equipment option for C-arm-guided PBC of the Gasserian ganglion for TN.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The degree of cervical extension required during percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of the Gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) varies among patients, but the traditional operating tables often fail to fulfil each patient's individual requirements.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of an extended operating table to that of a traditional operating table in C-arm-guided PBC of the Gasserian ganglion for TN.

Study design: This is a consecutively prospective comparative study.

Setting: Fujian Provincial Hospital.

Methods: This study consecutively enrolled patients with TN who were scheduled for PBC of the Gasserian ganglion between February 2020 and February 2023. Some patients who underwent the procedure were placed on an extended operating table, whereas others were placed on a traditional operating table. The primary outcome was the duration of the cervical extension. The secondary outcomes included the duration of patient positioning, operation duration, C-arm radiation exposure, and pressure pain threshold of the bilateral trapezius, levator scapulae, and upper trapezius muscles, as well as the occurrence rate of postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 76 patients (mean age of 53.18 ± 2.74 years old, 44 men) were enrolled, with 38 patients using the extended operating table. The baseline characteristics between the extended and traditional operating table groups were comparable (P > 0.05). The duration of the cervical extension was significantly shorter in patients who used an extended operating table than in those who used a traditional operating table (58.77 ± 2.11 vs. 76.49 ± 2.16, P < 0.001). Patients who used an extended operating table exhibited significantly shorter positioning time (3.40 ± 0.45 vs. 10.32 ± 0.66, P < 0.001), operation duration (50.88 ± 2.95 vs. 76.49 ± 2.16, P = 0.020), and C-arm radiation exposure (8.71 ± 1.06 vs. 10.87 ± 1.26, P < 0.001) and significantly higher postoperative 24-hour pressure pain thresholds of the bilateral trapezius muscle (left: 274.39 ± 10.42 vs. 187.05 ± 6.19, P < 0.001; right: 272.89 ± 11.62 vs. 185.42 ± 6.88, P < 0.001), bilateral levator scapulae (left: 357.71 ± 11.37 vs. 245.34 ± 12.87, P < 0.001; right: 353.71 ± 14.14 vs. 245.05 ± 13.20, P < 0.001), and bilateral upper trapezius (left: 253.63 ± 10.91 vs. 163.95 ± 8.44, P < 0.001; right: 255.66 ± 11.99 vs. 165.32 ± 7.93, P < 0.001) compared to those who used a traditional operating table. The occurrence of postoperative adverse events, such as headache, neck pain, back pain, and limb numbness, was significantly lower in the extended operating table group (2.63% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.047) than in the traditional operating table group.

Limitations: This is a single-center study with a small, homogeneous sample, limiting the generalizability of findings; the absence of randomization raises concerns about potential bias; long-term follow-up and recurrence rate measurements were lacking.

Conclusion: This study found that the extended operating table may be an alternative equipment option for C-arm-guided PBC of the Gasserian ganglion for TN.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
C臂引导下经皮球囊压迫加塞神经节治疗三叉神经痛的加长手术台与传统手术台:一项前瞻性研究
背景:在经皮球囊压迫(PBC)治疗三叉神经痛(TN)的过程中,不同患者所需的颈椎伸展程度各不相同,但传统手术台往往无法满足每位患者的个性化要求:本研究旨在比较加长型手术台与传统手术台在 C 臂引导下对加塞神经节进行 PBC 治疗 TN 的临床疗效:地点:福建省立医院:福建省立医院:本研究连续纳入了2020年2月至2023年2月期间计划接受PBC手术的TN患者。部分接受手术的患者被安置在加长手术台上,而其他患者则被安置在传统手术台上。主要结果是颈椎延长的持续时间。次要结果包括患者定位时间、手术时间、C型臂辐射暴露、双侧斜方肌、肩胛提肌和斜方肌上部的压痛阈值以及术后并发症发生率:共有 76 名患者(平均年龄为 53.18±2.74 岁,44 名男性)接受了手术,其中 38 名患者使用了加长型手术台。加长手术台组和传统手术台组的基线特征相当(P > 0.05)。使用加长型手术台的患者的颈椎伸展时间明显短于使用传统手术台的患者(58.77 ± 2.11 vs. 76.49 ± 2.16,P < 0.001)。使用加长手术台的患者定位时间(3.40 ± 0.45 vs. 10.32 ± 0.66,P < 0.001)、手术持续时间(50.88 ± 2.95 vs. 76.49 ± 2.16,P = 0.020)和 C 臂辐射暴露(8.71 ± 1.06 vs. 10.87 ± 1.26,P < 0.001),以及双侧斜方肌术后 24 小时压痛阈值显著更高(左:274.39 ± 10.42 vs. 187.05 ± 6.19,P < 0.001;右:272.89 ± 11.62 vs. 185.42 ± 6.88,P < 0.001)、双侧肩胛提肌(左:357.71 ± 11.37 vs. 245.34 ± 12.87,P < 0.001;右:353.71 ± 14.14 vs. 245.05 ± 13.20,P < 0.001)和双侧斜方肌上部(左:253.63 ± 10.91 vs. 163.95 ± 8.44,P < 0.001;右:255.66 ± 11.99 vs. 165.32 ± 7.93,P < 0.001)。头痛、颈痛、背痛和肢体麻木等术后不良事件的发生率在加长手术台组(2.63% vs. 13.79%,P = 0.047)明显低于传统手术台组:局限性:这是一项单中心研究,样本小而单一,限制了研究结果的普遍性;缺乏随机化引起了对潜在偏倚的担忧;缺乏长期随访和复发率测量:本研究发现,加长手术台可作为C臂引导下PBC治疗TN的替代设备选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
期刊最新文献
Delineating the Hurtful, Engaging, Emotive, and Directive (HEED) Dimensions of Pain. Characterization for Clinical Relevance. Effectiveness Analysis of Awake Computed Tomography-Guided Double-Needle Percutaneous Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for the Treatment of Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia. Efficacy Analysis of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Refractory Postherpetic Neuralgia. Erector Spinae Plane Block Provided Comparable Analgesia as Thoracic Paravertebral Block Post Pediatric Nuss Procedure for Pectus Excavatum: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Extended vs. Traditional Operating Table in C-Arm-Guided Percutaneous Balloon Compression of the Gasserian Ganglion for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1