Layna P Fox, Kayla R Tunehag, Anh Nguyen, Samuel Reed, Darshan Shastri, Nathan Quig, George A Stouffer, Sten Solander, Craig R Lee
{"title":"Real-world evaluation of <i>CYP2C19</i> guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair.","authors":"Layna P Fox, Kayla R Tunehag, Anh Nguyen, Samuel Reed, Darshan Shastri, Nathan Quig, George A Stouffer, Sten Solander, Craig R Lee","doi":"10.1080/14622416.2024.2406213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using <i>CYP2C19</i> genotype to guide selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm treatment with a flow diversion stent in a real-world clinical setting.<b>Patients & methods:</b> A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in 112 patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair with flow-diversion stenting from 2014 to 2021. Data were abstracted from health records. The frequency of clopidogrel or alternative therapy (ticagrelor or prasugrel) use was compared across CYP2C19 status (intermediate or poor metabolizer [IM/PM] vs. normal, rapid, or ultrarapid metabolizer [NM/RM/UM]).<b>Results:</b> In the study population, <i>CYP2C19</i> genotype testing was performed on 110 (98.2%) patients; of these, 106 (97.2%) had results available prior to the stent procedure and 28 (25.5%) were IM/PMs. Alternative therapy was used more frequently in IM/PMs compared with NM/RM/UMs (57.1 vs. 8.5%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The frequency of thromboembolic events over 12 months did not significantly differ across clopidogrel-treated IM/PMs, clopidogrel-treated NM/RM/UMs and patients on alternative therapy (<i>p</i> = 0.352); although, event numbers were low.<b>Conclusion:</b> A pre-emptive <i>CYP2C19</i> genotyping strategy to guide antiplatelet therapy selection in intracranial aneurysm repair patients is feasible in a real-world clinical setting. Larger studies are needed to assess the impact on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20018,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622416.2024.2406213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using CYP2C19 genotype to guide selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm treatment with a flow diversion stent in a real-world clinical setting.Patients & methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in 112 patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair with flow-diversion stenting from 2014 to 2021. Data were abstracted from health records. The frequency of clopidogrel or alternative therapy (ticagrelor or prasugrel) use was compared across CYP2C19 status (intermediate or poor metabolizer [IM/PM] vs. normal, rapid, or ultrarapid metabolizer [NM/RM/UM]).Results: In the study population, CYP2C19 genotype testing was performed on 110 (98.2%) patients; of these, 106 (97.2%) had results available prior to the stent procedure and 28 (25.5%) were IM/PMs. Alternative therapy was used more frequently in IM/PMs compared with NM/RM/UMs (57.1 vs. 8.5%, respectively, p < 0.0001). The frequency of thromboembolic events over 12 months did not significantly differ across clopidogrel-treated IM/PMs, clopidogrel-treated NM/RM/UMs and patients on alternative therapy (p = 0.352); although, event numbers were low.Conclusion: A pre-emptive CYP2C19 genotyping strategy to guide antiplatelet therapy selection in intracranial aneurysm repair patients is feasible in a real-world clinical setting. Larger studies are needed to assess the impact on clinical outcomes.
目的:在实际临床环境中,评估使用CYP2C19基因型指导颅内动脉瘤患者选择抗血小板疗法的可行性和影响:2014年至2021年期间,对112名接受颅内动脉瘤修补术和血流分流支架植入术的患者进行了一项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究。数据摘自健康记录。比较了不同CYP2C19状态(中度或低度代谢者[IM/PM]与正常、快速或超快速代谢者[NM/RM/UM])患者使用氯吡格雷或替代疗法(替卡格雷或普拉格雷)的频率:在研究人群中,有110名(98.2%)患者进行了CYP2C19基因型检测;其中106名(97.2%)患者在支架手术前获得了检测结果,28名(25.5%)患者为IM/PM。与NM/RM/UM相比,IM/PM患者使用替代疗法的频率更高(分别为57.1% vs. 8.5%,p p = 0.352);不过,事件数量较少:结论:在真实世界的临床环境中,指导颅内动脉瘤修复患者选择抗血小板疗法的先期CYP2C19基因分型策略是可行的。需要更大规模的研究来评估其对临床结果的影响。
期刊介绍:
Pharmacogenomics (ISSN 1462-2416) is a peer-reviewed journal presenting reviews and reports by the researchers and decision-makers closely involved in this rapidly developing area. Key objectives are to provide the community with an essential resource for keeping abreast of the latest developments in all areas of this exciting field.
Pharmacogenomics is the leading source of commentary and analysis, bringing you the highest quality expert analyses from corporate and academic opinion leaders in the field.