Investigating nurses' self-efficacy in pressure injury management within surgical services.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY Wound management & prevention Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.25270/wmp.23063
Orhan Polat, Ayla Yava, Aynur Koyuncu, Remzi Karasungur
{"title":"Investigating nurses' self-efficacy in pressure injury management within surgical services.","authors":"Orhan Polat, Ayla Yava, Aynur Koyuncu, Remzi Karasungur","doi":"10.25270/wmp.23063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New research is crucial in addressing the role of nurses in preventing pressure injuries (PIs) and remedying deficiencies in their self-efficacy in this area.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the self-efficacy perceptions of nurses in managing PIs within surgical services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 186 nurses from surgical services. Data were collected using a self-efficacy scale and a personal information form designed to assess nurses' PI management skills. Analysis involved descriptive (number, percentile) and inferential statistics (ANOVA, t- s) in SPSS-24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical nurses reported their self-efficacy in managing PIs with a mean score of 47.38 ± 21.87 on a self-efficacy scale, indicating a broad range of perceptions. Average scores were 43.55 ± 23.47 for evaluation, 48.39 ± 25.65 for planning, 43.68 ± 25.34 for surveillance, and 50.64 ± 22.23 for decision-making. Of note, nurses reported the lowest self-efficacy scores for evaluation. No significant differences were found based on employment duration, gender, or education. Significant differences were observed based on age, service level, and post-graduate education (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for enhanced nurse self-efficacy in PI management in surgical services, emphasizing the role of education programs focused on evaluation skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":23741,"journal":{"name":"Wound management & prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound management & prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wmp.23063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New research is crucial in addressing the role of nurses in preventing pressure injuries (PIs) and remedying deficiencies in their self-efficacy in this area.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the self-efficacy perceptions of nurses in managing PIs within surgical services.

Methods: The study involved 186 nurses from surgical services. Data were collected using a self-efficacy scale and a personal information form designed to assess nurses' PI management skills. Analysis involved descriptive (number, percentile) and inferential statistics (ANOVA, t- s) in SPSS-24.

Results: Surgical nurses reported their self-efficacy in managing PIs with a mean score of 47.38 ± 21.87 on a self-efficacy scale, indicating a broad range of perceptions. Average scores were 43.55 ± 23.47 for evaluation, 48.39 ± 25.65 for planning, 43.68 ± 25.34 for surveillance, and 50.64 ± 22.23 for decision-making. Of note, nurses reported the lowest self-efficacy scores for evaluation. No significant differences were found based on employment duration, gender, or education. Significant differences were observed based on age, service level, and post-graduate education (P < .05).

Conclusion: This study highlights the need for enhanced nurse self-efficacy in PI management in surgical services, emphasizing the role of education programs focused on evaluation skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查护士在外科服务中处理压力损伤的自我效能。
背景:新的研究对于解决护士在预防压力损伤(PIs)中的作用以及弥补护士在这一领域自我效能感的不足至关重要。目的:本研究旨在考察护士在外科服务中管理压力损伤的自我效能感:研究涉及 186 名外科护士。采用自我效能量表和个人信息表收集数据,旨在评估护士的 PI 管理技能。分析包括 SPSS-24 中的描述性统计(数字、百分位数)和推论性统计(方差分析、t- s):外科护士在自我效能感量表上的平均得分为(47.38±21.87)分,表明她们在管理 PI 方面具有广泛的自我效能感。评估的平均得分为(43.55 ± 23.47)分,计划的平均得分为(48.39 ± 25.65)分,监督的平均得分为(43.68 ± 25.34)分,决策的平均得分为(50.64 ± 22.23)分。值得注意的是,护士在评估方面的自我效能感得分最低。在就业时间、性别或教育程度方面没有发现明显差异。年龄、服务水平和研究生教育程度则存在显著差异(P < .05):本研究强调了在外科服务中提高护士 PI 管理自我效能的必要性,并强调了以评估技能为重点的教育计划的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound management & prevention
Wound management & prevention Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case series describing combined negative pressure wound therapy and split-thickness skin graft as a method of sterilizing and closing midline laparotomy wounds near ostomies. A new decision tool to objectively select the most appropriate ostomy system - a survey among ostomy nurse specialists. A review of the current trends in chronic wound and scar management. Comparative occipital pressure mapping in the operating room. Early postoperative complications of elective versus emergency stoma creation: a tertiary academic center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1