Patient-Centered Cost Saving and Positive Environmental Impact With the Introduction of Telehealth Services at a Single Center.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000723
Vivian Wong, Jessica Cohen, Amanda Ingram, Edward Woods, Brian Mitchell, Brooke Bellamy, Tasha Posid, Irene Crescenze
{"title":"Patient-Centered Cost Saving and Positive Environmental Impact With the Introduction of Telehealth Services at a Single Center.","authors":"Vivian Wong, Jessica Cohen, Amanda Ingram, Edward Woods, Brian Mitchell, Brooke Bellamy, Tasha Posid, Irene Crescenze","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to establish the patient-specific cost and time savings associated with telemedicine with the secondary environmental benefits of virtual visits within a tertiary referral center subspecialty urology clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic health record query was made of all urology telehealth visits that have occurred between April 10, 2020, and October 10, 2020, at a single academic center. We evaluated the cost of travel for an in-person visit based on zip code data. To adjust for productivity loss, the cost of missed work was added as either full-day or half-day-based distance and average compensation per day based on zip code data. Environmental impact was calculated using average CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per mile not traveled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 6444 patients seen in the urology clinic through telehealth during the 6-month period. Urology patients traveled on average 69 ± 148 miles round trip for an appointment. The average cost savings per patient including the cost of gas and time away from work was $152.78 ± $105.90. Overall, over a 6-month period, the total cost savings was $984,534.73 for the 6444 patients seen through telemedicine. There was also a significant environmental impact of the decreased travel burden with 153.36 metric tons of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients have been able to save a substantial amount of time and money primarily driven by the decreasing work hours lost and cost of travel.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to establish the patient-specific cost and time savings associated with telemedicine with the secondary environmental benefits of virtual visits within a tertiary referral center subspecialty urology clinic.

Methods: An electronic health record query was made of all urology telehealth visits that have occurred between April 10, 2020, and October 10, 2020, at a single academic center. We evaluated the cost of travel for an in-person visit based on zip code data. To adjust for productivity loss, the cost of missed work was added as either full-day or half-day-based distance and average compensation per day based on zip code data. Environmental impact was calculated using average CO2 emissions per mile not traveled.

Results: There were 6444 patients seen in the urology clinic through telehealth during the 6-month period. Urology patients traveled on average 69 ± 148 miles round trip for an appointment. The average cost savings per patient including the cost of gas and time away from work was $152.78 ± $105.90. Overall, over a 6-month period, the total cost savings was $984,534.73 for the 6444 patients seen through telemedicine. There was also a significant environmental impact of the decreased travel burden with 153.36 metric tons of CO2 emissions eliminated.

Conclusions: With the implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients have been able to save a substantial amount of time and money primarily driven by the decreasing work hours lost and cost of travel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一个中心引入远程医疗服务,以病人为中心节约成本并对环境产生积极影响。
目的在三级转诊中心的泌尿科亚专科门诊中,确定与远程医疗相关的患者特定成本和时间节省情况,以及虚拟就诊的次要环境效益:方法: 我们对一家学术中心 2020 年 10 月 4 日至 2020 年 10 月 10 日期间发生的所有泌尿外科远程医疗就诊进行了电子健康记录查询。我们根据邮政编码数据评估了亲自就诊的旅行成本。为了对生产力损失进行调整,我们根据距离和邮政编码数据,将误工成本按全天或半天计算。对环境的影响是根据每英里未行驶的平均二氧化碳排放量计算得出的:在 6 个月的时间里,有 6444 名患者通过远程医疗在泌尿科诊所就诊。泌尿科患者预约就诊的平均往返里程为 69 ± 148 英里。包括油费和误工费在内,每位患者平均节省了 152.78 美元 ± 105.90 美元。总体而言,在 6 个月的时间里,通过远程医疗就诊的 6444 名患者共节省了 984,534.73 美元。旅行负担的减轻也对环境产生了重大影响,减少了 153.36 公吨的二氧化碳排放量:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施远程医疗后,患者能够节省大量时间和金钱,主要原因是减少了工时损失和差旅费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Type 1a Selective Alpha Blockers in VigiBase. Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Warm, Cold, and No Ischemia Methods. Risks and Benefits of Caprini Score Recommended Thromboprophylaxis After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy. Trends in Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy and Same-Day Discharge for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. Evidence-Based Framework for Surgical Irrigation Fluid Stewardship and Endoscopic Case Prioritization During Fluid Shortages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1