Vivian Wong, Jessica Cohen, Amanda Ingram, Edward Woods, Brian Mitchell, Brooke Bellamy, Tasha Posid, Irene Crescenze
{"title":"Patient-Centered Cost Saving and Positive Environmental Impact With the Introduction of Telehealth Services at a Single Center.","authors":"Vivian Wong, Jessica Cohen, Amanda Ingram, Edward Woods, Brian Mitchell, Brooke Bellamy, Tasha Posid, Irene Crescenze","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to establish the patient-specific cost and time savings associated with telemedicine with the secondary environmental benefits of virtual visits within a tertiary referral center subspecialty urology clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic health record query was made of all urology telehealth visits that have occurred between April 10, 2020, and October 10, 2020, at a single academic center. We evaluated the cost of travel for an in-person visit based on zip code data. To adjust for productivity loss, the cost of missed work was added as either full-day or half-day-based distance and average compensation per day based on zip code data. Environmental impact was calculated using average CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per mile not traveled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 6444 patients seen in the urology clinic through telehealth during the 6-month period. Urology patients traveled on average 69 ± 148 miles round trip for an appointment. The average cost savings per patient including the cost of gas and time away from work was $152.78 ± $105.90. Overall, over a 6-month period, the total cost savings was $984,534.73 for the 6444 patients seen through telemedicine. There was also a significant environmental impact of the decreased travel burden with 153.36 metric tons of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients have been able to save a substantial amount of time and money primarily driven by the decreasing work hours lost and cost of travel.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to establish the patient-specific cost and time savings associated with telemedicine with the secondary environmental benefits of virtual visits within a tertiary referral center subspecialty urology clinic.
Methods: An electronic health record query was made of all urology telehealth visits that have occurred between April 10, 2020, and October 10, 2020, at a single academic center. We evaluated the cost of travel for an in-person visit based on zip code data. To adjust for productivity loss, the cost of missed work was added as either full-day or half-day-based distance and average compensation per day based on zip code data. Environmental impact was calculated using average CO2 emissions per mile not traveled.
Results: There were 6444 patients seen in the urology clinic through telehealth during the 6-month period. Urology patients traveled on average 69 ± 148 miles round trip for an appointment. The average cost savings per patient including the cost of gas and time away from work was $152.78 ± $105.90. Overall, over a 6-month period, the total cost savings was $984,534.73 for the 6444 patients seen through telemedicine. There was also a significant environmental impact of the decreased travel burden with 153.36 metric tons of CO2 emissions eliminated.
Conclusions: With the implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients have been able to save a substantial amount of time and money primarily driven by the decreasing work hours lost and cost of travel.