3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial.

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029
M Pavone, S Di Berardino, G Esposito, A Baroni, M D'Indinosante, M T Giudice, A Gioé, F Campolo, U Catena, G Scambia, F Fanfani, S Restaino
{"title":"3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial.","authors":"M Pavone, S Di Berardino, G Esposito, A Baroni, M D'Indinosante, M T Giudice, A Gioé, F Campolo, U Catena, G Scambia, F Fanfani, S Restaino","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technological advances in visual systems have contributed to overcoming the limitations in spatial perception of minimally invasive techniques. To date, there is a lack of literature on the advantages of 3D vision systems over 4K in laparoscopic surgery, although benefits have been observed in the training setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare operating times, perioperative outcomes, and task achievement using 3D and 4K vision systems for vaginal cuff closure performed by residents during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). All surgeons in training have obtained the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) certificate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a prospective randomised trial (NCT04637022). Women undergoing total hysterectomies for benign conditions between January 2021 and November 2023 were enrolled in the study. Vaginal cuff closures were performed by surgeons in training who had obtained the second level of the GESEA programme certificate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in time between 3D and 4K vision for vaginal cuff closure (p=0.918). No statistically significant differences were observed for mean estimated blood loss (EBL) (overall: 62.85 ± 22.73mL; 3D: 65 ± 24.83mL; 4K: 61.11 ± 21.18; p=0.556) and median hospital stay (p=0.234). Three non-severe intraoperative complications in the 3D group (p=0.048) and three postoperative complications in the entire cohort (p=0.685) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The operating time for vaginal cuff closure performed by trainee surgeons is similar when comparing 3D vision during conventional laparoscopy and 4K vision systems. The choice of surgical vision systems may be guided by a cost analysis and surgeon preferences.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Substantial evidence is lacking regarding the advantages of incorporating 3D vision into standard laparoscopy for gynaecological surgery. This research seeks to assess whether the 3D visual system can provide benefits as compared to 4K visualisation during laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure performed by surgeons in training within the GESEA 2 certification programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 3","pages":"317-323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.3.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Technological advances in visual systems have contributed to overcoming the limitations in spatial perception of minimally invasive techniques. To date, there is a lack of literature on the advantages of 3D vision systems over 4K in laparoscopic surgery, although benefits have been observed in the training setting.

Objectives: To compare operating times, perioperative outcomes, and task achievement using 3D and 4K vision systems for vaginal cuff closure performed by residents during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). All surgeons in training have obtained the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) certificate.

Materials and methods: This is a prospective randomised trial (NCT04637022). Women undergoing total hysterectomies for benign conditions between January 2021 and November 2023 were enrolled in the study. Vaginal cuff closures were performed by surgeons in training who had obtained the second level of the GESEA programme certificate.

Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in time between 3D and 4K vision for vaginal cuff closure (p=0.918). No statistically significant differences were observed for mean estimated blood loss (EBL) (overall: 62.85 ± 22.73mL; 3D: 65 ± 24.83mL; 4K: 61.11 ± 21.18; p=0.556) and median hospital stay (p=0.234). Three non-severe intraoperative complications in the 3D group (p=0.048) and three postoperative complications in the entire cohort (p=0.685) were reported.

Conclusions: The operating time for vaginal cuff closure performed by trainee surgeons is similar when comparing 3D vision during conventional laparoscopy and 4K vision systems. The choice of surgical vision systems may be guided by a cost analysis and surgeon preferences.

What is new?: Substantial evidence is lacking regarding the advantages of incorporating 3D vision into standard laparoscopy for gynaecological surgery. This research seeks to assess whether the 3D visual system can provide benefits as compared to 4K visualisation during laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure performed by surgeons in training within the GESEA 2 certification programme.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由接受过培训的外科医生在子宫切除术后进行 3D 与 4K 腹腔镜阴道袖带闭合术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
背景:视觉系统的技术进步有助于克服微创技术在空间感知方面的局限性。迄今为止,尽管在培训环境中已观察到 3D 视觉系统比 4K 视觉系统在腹腔镜手术中的优势,但缺乏这方面的文献:目的:比较住院医生在全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)中使用 3D 和 4K 视觉系统进行阴道袖带闭合的手术时间、围术期效果和任务完成情况。所有接受培训的外科医生均已获得妇科内窥镜手术教育和评估(GESEA)证书:这是一项前瞻性随机试验(NCT04637022)。2021年1月至2023年11月期间,因良性疾病接受全子宫切除术的女性被纳入研究。阴道袖带闭合术由获得 GESEA 项目二级证书的受训外科医生实施:结果:54 名患者参与了研究。3D和4K视野下阴道袖带闭合的时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.918)。平均估计失血量(EBL)(总体:62.85 ± 22.73mL;3D:65 ± 24.83mL;4K:61.11 ± 21.18;p=0.556)和中位住院时间(p=0.234)无统计学差异。3D组有3例非严重术中并发症(p=0.048),整个组群有3例术后并发症(p=0.685):结论:比较传统腹腔镜手术中的3D视觉系统和4K视觉系统,见习外科医生进行阴道袖带闭合术的手术时间相似。手术视觉系统的选择可根据成本分析和外科医生的偏好来决定:关于在妇科手术的标准腹腔镜中加入3D视觉的优势,目前还缺乏大量证据。这项研究旨在评估在GESEA 2认证项目中接受培训的外科医生在进行腹腔镜阴道袖带闭合术时,3D视觉系统与4K视觉系统相比是否具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial. Achieving successful outcomes with endometrial ablation needs better case selection. Author's response. Caesarean scar defect and retained products of conception (RPOC): a step-by-step combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment. Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1