Utility of routine preoperative laboratory testing for patients undergoing minor gynaecologic surgical procedures: interim analysis of their impact on intraoperative and postoperative complications.

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.16.3.027
U Catena, A Biasioli, C Paglietti, V Tarantino, G Pellecchia, G Esposito, F Previtera, S Zermano, M Arcieri, A Graziano, G Dinoi, F Ciano, L Driul, G Draisci, F Fanfani, G Scambia, G Vizzielli, S Restaino
{"title":"Utility of routine preoperative laboratory testing for patients undergoing minor gynaecologic surgical procedures: interim analysis of their impact on intraoperative and postoperative complications.","authors":"U Catena, A Biasioli, C Paglietti, V Tarantino, G Pellecchia, G Esposito, F Previtera, S Zermano, M Arcieri, A Graziano, G Dinoi, F Ciano, L Driul, G Draisci, F Fanfani, G Scambia, G Vizzielli, S Restaino","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.16.3.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite discouragement from many scientific societies, routine preoperative testing remains a common practice. Minor gynaecological surgery, being widely performed in everyday practice, represents an opportunity for implementing cost-reduction policies by avoiding unnecessary diagnostic assessments.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether performing routine preoperative blood tests affects postoperative complications and cost-effectiveness in patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An interim subgroup analysis of a retrospective study conducted by Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli (Rome) and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (Udine) was performed. Patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia were included. The studied population was divided based on the preoperative work up. Clinical data, surgical features and complications were collected.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Intraoperative and postoperative complications, healthcare expenditure in two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subgroup analysis included 1191 patients in Centre A (Rome) who underwent routine complete preoperative tests and 500 patients in Centre B (Udine), who underwent exams only if indicated. Population characteristics were similar in two groups. Postoperative complications were observed in 1.2% and 1.4% of cases in Group A and Group B, respectively (p=0.70). Severe complications occurred in 0.3% of cases in Group A and 0.4% in Group B. Group B showed a cost saving of approximately 70 Euros per procedure (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary data indicate that routine perioperative assessment did not reduce complication rates, hospital readmissions or surgical reinterventions. Given the high number of procedures, performing specific preoperative tests only when indicated may result in significant cost reduction.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>This study selectively highlights the potential benefits to overall public health expenditure that could be achieved through stricter adherence to guidelines on preoperative assessment in minor gynaecological surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 3","pages":"295-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.3.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite discouragement from many scientific societies, routine preoperative testing remains a common practice. Minor gynaecological surgery, being widely performed in everyday practice, represents an opportunity for implementing cost-reduction policies by avoiding unnecessary diagnostic assessments.

Objectives: To assess whether performing routine preoperative blood tests affects postoperative complications and cost-effectiveness in patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery.

Materials and methods: An interim subgroup analysis of a retrospective study conducted by Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli (Rome) and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (Udine) was performed. Patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia were included. The studied population was divided based on the preoperative work up. Clinical data, surgical features and complications were collected.

Main outcome measures: Intraoperative and postoperative complications, healthcare expenditure in two groups.

Results: Subgroup analysis included 1191 patients in Centre A (Rome) who underwent routine complete preoperative tests and 500 patients in Centre B (Udine), who underwent exams only if indicated. Population characteristics were similar in two groups. Postoperative complications were observed in 1.2% and 1.4% of cases in Group A and Group B, respectively (p=0.70). Severe complications occurred in 0.3% of cases in Group A and 0.4% in Group B. Group B showed a cost saving of approximately 70 Euros per procedure (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate that routine perioperative assessment did not reduce complication rates, hospital readmissions or surgical reinterventions. Given the high number of procedures, performing specific preoperative tests only when indicated may result in significant cost reduction.

What is new?: This study selectively highlights the potential benefits to overall public health expenditure that could be achieved through stricter adherence to guidelines on preoperative assessment in minor gynaecological surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科小手术患者术前常规实验室检测的实用性:对术中和术后并发症影响的中期分析。
背景:尽管许多科学协会不鼓励进行常规术前检查,但这种做法仍很普遍。妇科小手术在日常实践中广泛开展,通过避免不必要的诊断评估,为实施降低成本政策提供了机会:目的:评估常规术前血液检查是否会影响妇科小手术患者的术后并发症和成本效益:对Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli(罗马)和Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale(乌迪内)进行的一项回顾性研究进行了中期分组分析。研究对象包括在全身麻醉下接受手术的患者。研究对象根据术前检查结果进行划分。收集了临床数据、手术特征和并发症:两组患者的术中和术后并发症、医疗支出:亚组分析包括 A 中心(罗马)的 1191 名患者和 B 中心(乌迪内)的 500 名患者,前者接受了完整的术前常规检查,后者仅在有指征时接受检查。两组患者的特征相似。A组和B组分别有1.2%和1.4%的病例出现术后并发症(P=0.70)。严重并发症在 A 组和 B 组的发生率分别为 0.3% 和 0.4%。B 组每例手术节省成本约 70 欧元(p < 0.001):初步数据显示,常规围手术期评估并未降低并发症发生率、再入院率或手术再干预率。鉴于手术数量较多,只有在有必要时才进行特定的术前检查可能会显著降低成本:这项研究有选择性地强调了在妇科小手术中严格遵守术前评估指南可能会给公共卫生总支出带来的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial. Achieving successful outcomes with endometrial ablation needs better case selection. Author's response. Caesarean scar defect and retained products of conception (RPOC): a step-by-step combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment. Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1