J McGee, A McClure, S Ilnitsky, A Vilos, B Abu-Rafea, G Vilos
{"title":"Hysterectomy Rate Following Endometrial Ablation in Ontario: A Cohort Analysis of 76,446 Patients.","authors":"J McGee, A McClure, S Ilnitsky, A Vilos, B Abu-Rafea, G Vilos","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.13.3.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometrial Ablation (EA) is an alternative to hysterectomy for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); however, it does not eliminate the need for future surgical re-intervention.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to establish long-term clinical outcomes including the risk of hysterectomy in women who had undergone a primary EA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective population-based cohort study utilising administrative data from the Canadian province of Ontario. This study assesses patients undergoing surgery in a publicly funded health care system.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We assessed women in Ontario undergoing a primary EA over a 15-year period. The primary outcome was hysterectomy within 5 years of primary EA. Secondary outcomes included myomectomy and repeat EA. All outcomes were also reported for 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 years of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to establish predictors of hysterectomy within 5 years of primary EA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76,446 primary EAs were evaluated from 2002-2017, with 16,480 (21.56%) undergoing a subsequent surgical intervention. The average age of primary EA was 43.8 (+/- 6.3) years. Within 5 years, the evaluable cohort was 52,464, with 8,635 (16.46%) of women having proceeded to hysterectomy, 664 (1.27%) to myomectomy, and 2,468 (2.8%) to repeat ablation. By 15-years follow-up, the evaluable cohort was 1,788, with 28.75% had undergone a hysterectomy, 2.01% a myomectomy, and 5.20% a repeat EA. On logistic regression analysis, advancing age at time of EA was associated with significantly decreased odds of hysterectomy (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.935-0.944, p<.0001) as was increasing surgical experience (OR=0.997, 95% CI 0.994-1.000, p=.022). Conversely, complex diagnosis (OR=1.102, 95% CI 1.042-1.164, p<.0001) and previous abdominal surgery (OR=1.288, 95% CI 1.222-1.357, p<0.0001) were associated with increased risk of subsequent hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary EA is associated with a high risk of progression to subsequent hysterectomy or other surgical intervention, without evidence of plateau of risk with long term follow-up.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>This study has the longest follow-up assessing hysterectomy outcomes in women undergoing a primary EA, with 28.75% of women having undergone a hysterectomy within 15 years of their EA.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 3","pages":"311-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.13.3.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endometrial Ablation (EA) is an alternative to hysterectomy for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); however, it does not eliminate the need for future surgical re-intervention.
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to establish long-term clinical outcomes including the risk of hysterectomy in women who had undergone a primary EA.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospective population-based cohort study utilising administrative data from the Canadian province of Ontario. This study assesses patients undergoing surgery in a publicly funded health care system.
Main outcome measures: We assessed women in Ontario undergoing a primary EA over a 15-year period. The primary outcome was hysterectomy within 5 years of primary EA. Secondary outcomes included myomectomy and repeat EA. All outcomes were also reported for 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 years of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to establish predictors of hysterectomy within 5 years of primary EA.
Results: A total of 76,446 primary EAs were evaluated from 2002-2017, with 16,480 (21.56%) undergoing a subsequent surgical intervention. The average age of primary EA was 43.8 (+/- 6.3) years. Within 5 years, the evaluable cohort was 52,464, with 8,635 (16.46%) of women having proceeded to hysterectomy, 664 (1.27%) to myomectomy, and 2,468 (2.8%) to repeat ablation. By 15-years follow-up, the evaluable cohort was 1,788, with 28.75% had undergone a hysterectomy, 2.01% a myomectomy, and 5.20% a repeat EA. On logistic regression analysis, advancing age at time of EA was associated with significantly decreased odds of hysterectomy (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.935-0.944, p<.0001) as was increasing surgical experience (OR=0.997, 95% CI 0.994-1.000, p=.022). Conversely, complex diagnosis (OR=1.102, 95% CI 1.042-1.164, p<.0001) and previous abdominal surgery (OR=1.288, 95% CI 1.222-1.357, p<0.0001) were associated with increased risk of subsequent hysterectomy.
Conclusion: Primary EA is associated with a high risk of progression to subsequent hysterectomy or other surgical intervention, without evidence of plateau of risk with long term follow-up.
What is new?: This study has the longest follow-up assessing hysterectomy outcomes in women undergoing a primary EA, with 28.75% of women having undergone a hysterectomy within 15 years of their EA.