Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for local application in the prevention of surgical site infection after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Efort Open Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1530/EOR-23-0023
Chengxin Xie, Liwei Zhang, Dehua Zhang, Lingjian Tao, Yong Zhao, Hua Luo
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for local application in the prevention of surgical site infection after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chengxin Xie, Liwei Zhang, Dehua Zhang, Lingjian Tao, Yong Zhao, Hua Luo","doi":"10.1530/EOR-23-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the effect of topical vancomycin powder (VP) in surgical site infection (SSI) prevention and adverse events after joint arthroplasty and to provide a specific theoretical basis for clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers meticulously screened the literature based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality of the selected studies, and extracted relevant data. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 24 studies encompassing a total of 34 811 patients. The pooled analysis showed that the topical administration of VP significantly reduced the incidence of SSI. Subgroup analyses by doses, type of joint (hip and knee), and type of surgery (primary and revision) confirmed that vancomycin consistently lowered SSI rates. Moreover, the incidence of SSI caused by gram-negative germs and gram-positive germs decreased following the use of VP, although the reduction was not significant for infections caused by MRSA. However, the use of VP was associated with a significant increase in sterile complications at the incision site and delayed incision healing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The topical application of VP is effective in reducing the incidence of infections following joint arthroplasty. Despite an increased risk of complications such as delayed healing of incisions, the pros and cons should be weighed in clinical decision-making. However, it should not be discarded due to side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the effect of topical vancomycin powder (VP) in surgical site infection (SSI) prevention and adverse events after joint arthroplasty and to provide a specific theoretical basis for clinical treatment.

Methods: The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers meticulously screened the literature based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality of the selected studies, and extracted relevant data. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results: This meta-analysis included 24 studies encompassing a total of 34 811 patients. The pooled analysis showed that the topical administration of VP significantly reduced the incidence of SSI. Subgroup analyses by doses, type of joint (hip and knee), and type of surgery (primary and revision) confirmed that vancomycin consistently lowered SSI rates. Moreover, the incidence of SSI caused by gram-negative germs and gram-positive germs decreased following the use of VP, although the reduction was not significant for infections caused by MRSA. However, the use of VP was associated with a significant increase in sterile complications at the incision site and delayed incision healing.

Conclusion: The topical application of VP is effective in reducing the incidence of infections following joint arthroplasty. Despite an increased risk of complications such as delayed healing of incisions, the pros and cons should be weighed in clinical decision-making. However, it should not be discarded due to side effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部应用万古霉素预防关节置换术后手术部位感染的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨外用万古霉素粉(VP)在预防关节置换术后手术部位感染(SSI)和不良事件方面的效果,并为临床治疗提供具体的理论依据:综述过程按照 PRISMA 指南进行。两名独立研究人员根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准对文献进行了细致的筛选,对所选研究的质量进行了评估,并提取了相关数据。数据分析使用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行:这项荟萃分析包括 24 项研究,共涉及 34 811 名患者。汇总分析显示,局部使用 VP 能显著降低 SSI 的发生率。按剂量、关节类型(髋关节和膝关节)和手术类型(初次手术和翻修手术)进行的分组分析证实,万古霉素能持续降低 SSI 发生率。此外,使用 VP 后,革兰氏阴性病菌和革兰氏阳性病菌引起的 SSI 发生率均有所下降,但 MRSA 引起的感染发生率下降不明显。然而,使用 VP 与切口部位无菌并发症显著增加和切口延迟愈合有关:结论:局部使用 VP 能有效降低关节置换术后的感染率。尽管会增加切口延迟愈合等并发症的风险,但在临床决策中应权衡利弊。不过,不应因副作用而放弃使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for local application in the prevention of surgical site infection after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaplan fibers of iliotibial band: a comprehensive review of current literature. Native intra-articular knee microbiome is a matter of facts: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in military personnel: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1