Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in military personnel: a systematic review.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Efort Open Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1530/EOR-22-0113
Wen-Yuan Xing, Yong-Hui Zhang, Qi-Hao Yang, Xue-Qiang Wang
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in military personnel: a systematic review.","authors":"Wen-Yuan Xing, Yong-Hui Zhang, Qi-Hao Yang, Xue-Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1530/EOR-22-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) has a significant impact on the general population, especially on military personnel. This study aimed to systematically review the relevant literature to determine the prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among military personnel from different military occupational categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this systematic review, we searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane. We performed study selection, data extraction, and assessed the quality of the evidence using the adapted risk of bias assessment tool by Hoy et al. This review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This study is registered on the Center for Open Science, registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HRGE8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 860 papers, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. More than 360 000 military people with lumbar pain situation were considered for inclusion in this systematic review. The 1-year prevalence of LBP could be up to 81.7% in the Army, 5.2% in the Marines, and 48.1% in the Air Force. Age (OR = 0.494-2.89), history of LBP (OR = 2.2-8.91), and sedentary position (OR = 0.55-3.63) were the most common physical, sociodemographic, and occupational risk factors, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low back pain was prevalent among military personnel. There was heterogeneity in studies and a significant difference in prevalence and incidence across various occupational categories. Physical, sociodemographic, and occupational risk factors were researched more than psychological risk factors in the military.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) has a significant impact on the general population, especially on military personnel. This study aimed to systematically review the relevant literature to determine the prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among military personnel from different military occupational categories.

Methods: For this systematic review, we searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane. We performed study selection, data extraction, and assessed the quality of the evidence using the adapted risk of bias assessment tool by Hoy et al. This review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This study is registered on the Center for Open Science, registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HRGE8.

Results: Out of 860 papers, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. More than 360 000 military people with lumbar pain situation were considered for inclusion in this systematic review. The 1-year prevalence of LBP could be up to 81.7% in the Army, 5.2% in the Marines, and 48.1% in the Air Force. Age (OR = 0.494-2.89), history of LBP (OR = 2.2-8.91), and sedentary position (OR = 0.55-3.63) were the most common physical, sociodemographic, and occupational risk factors, respectively.

Conclusions: Low back pain was prevalent among military personnel. There was heterogeneity in studies and a significant difference in prevalence and incidence across various occupational categories. Physical, sociodemographic, and occupational risk factors were researched more than psychological risk factors in the military.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军人腰背痛的患病率和风险因素:系统性综述。
目的:腰背痛(LBP)对普通人群,尤其是军人的影响很大。本研究旨在系统回顾相关文献,以确定不同军事职业类别的军人腰背痛的患病率和风险因素:在此次系统性综述中,我们检索了 Embase、PubMed 和 Cochrane。我们进行了研究筛选、数据提取,并使用 Hoy 等人改编的偏倚风险评估工具对证据质量进行了评估。本综述过程根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。本研究已在开放科学中心注册,注册 DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/HRGE8.Results:在 860 篇论文中,有 19 项研究符合纳入标准。超过 36 万名患有腰痛的军人被考虑纳入本系统综述。在陆军、海军陆战队和空军中,腰痛的 1 年患病率分别高达 81.7%、5.2% 和 48.1%。年龄(OR = 0.494-2.89)、腰背痛病史(OR = 2.2-8.91 )和久坐姿势(OR = 0.55-3.63)分别是最常见的身体、社会人口和职业风险因素:结论:腰背痛在军人中很普遍。结论:腰背痛在军人中普遍存在,不同研究之间存在异质性,不同职业类别的患病率和发病率也存在显著差异。在军队中,对身体、社会人口和职业风险因素的研究多于对心理风险因素的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for local application in the prevention of surgical site infection after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaplan fibers of iliotibial band: a comprehensive review of current literature. Native intra-articular knee microbiome is a matter of facts: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in military personnel: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1