Development of the Hiesho (sensitivity of hands or feet to cold) Care Practice Scale for pregnant women

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Japan Journal of Nursing Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/jjns.12621
Sachiyo Nakamura, Shoko Takeuchi, Takahiro Hoshino, Naoko Okubo, Shigeko Horiuchi
{"title":"Development of the Hiesho (sensitivity of hands or feet to cold) Care Practice Scale for pregnant women","authors":"Sachiyo Nakamura,&nbsp;Shoko Takeuchi,&nbsp;Takahiro Hoshino,&nbsp;Naoko Okubo,&nbsp;Shigeko Horiuchi","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence-based indicators are needed to increase the frequency of practicing care for hiesho, which can be a risk factor during childbirth. Such practice will lead to hiesho prevention. This study aimed to develop a Hiesho Care Practice Scale (HCPS) for pregnant women and examine its reliability and validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To develop a HCPS and examine its reliability and validity, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey among nurses who provide hiesho care for pregnant women in Japan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis included 100 participants (recovery rate: 96%). Exploratory factor analysis produced four factors and 20 items. The model's fit indices obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis include goodness of fit of .80, adjusted goodness of fit of .75, comparative fit index of .88, and root mean squared error of approximation of .08. The correlation coefficients for the patient coaching skill evaluation scale for criterion-related validity test ranged from .23 to .51 (<i>p</i> &lt; .01).</p>\n \n <p>Cronbach's <i>α</i> was .88, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was .81.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The HCPS developed in this study consisted of four factors and 20 items, and its reliability and validity were verified. This scale enables the subjective and objective evaluation of hiesho care practice in the nursing profession. It may contribute to standardizing and developing improvement measures for hiesho care among pregnant women by nurses and midwives.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.12621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Evidence-based indicators are needed to increase the frequency of practicing care for hiesho, which can be a risk factor during childbirth. Such practice will lead to hiesho prevention. This study aimed to develop a Hiesho Care Practice Scale (HCPS) for pregnant women and examine its reliability and validity.

Methods

To develop a HCPS and examine its reliability and validity, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey among nurses who provide hiesho care for pregnant women in Japan.

Results

The analysis included 100 participants (recovery rate: 96%). Exploratory factor analysis produced four factors and 20 items. The model's fit indices obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis include goodness of fit of .80, adjusted goodness of fit of .75, comparative fit index of .88, and root mean squared error of approximation of .08. The correlation coefficients for the patient coaching skill evaluation scale for criterion-related validity test ranged from .23 to .51 (p < .01).

Cronbach's α was .88, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was .81.

Conclusions

The HCPS developed in this study consisted of four factors and 20 items, and its reliability and validity were verified. This scale enables the subjective and objective evaluation of hiesho care practice in the nursing profession. It may contribute to standardizing and developing improvement measures for hiesho care among pregnant women by nurses and midwives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为孕妇开发 Hiesho(手或脚对寒冷的敏感性)护理实践量表。
目的:需要以证据为基础的指标,以增加对分娩过程中可能成为风险因素的 "hiesho "进行护理的频率。这种做法将有助于预防 Hiesho。本研究旨在为孕妇编制 "顺产护理实践量表"(HCPS),并检验其可靠性和有效性:为了开发 HCPS 并检验其可靠性和有效性,我们对日本为孕妇提供 Hiesho 护理的护士进行了问卷调查:分析包括 100 名参与者(回收率:96%)。探索性因子分析产生了四个因子和 20 个项目。确认性因子分析得出的模型拟合指数包括:拟合优度为 0.80,调整后拟合优度为 0.75,比较拟合指数为 0.88,均方根近似误差为 0.08。患者指导技能评估量表在标准相关效度检验中的相关系数介于 0.23 至 0.51 之间(p 结论):本研究开发的患者指导技能评价量表由四个因子和 20 个项目组成,其信度和效度均得到了验证。该量表可对护理专业的 hiesho 护理实践进行主观和客观评价。它可能有助于护士和助产士对孕妇的 hiesho 护理进行标准化和制定改进措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
期刊最新文献
Rural women's voices revealing perceptions about decisions on where to give birth in Gabon: A qualitative study Association of psychosocial factors at work with fertility and menstrual disorders: A systematic review Evaluation of the performance of nursing students taught using online and offline learning models in emergency and critical care nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic The role of family support in medication adherence and quality of life among tuberculosis patients: A scoping review Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1