Recognition of differently expressed genes and DNA methylation markers in patients with Lupus nephritis.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is distinguished by dysregulated immune system activity, resulting in a spectrum of clinical manifestations, with lupus nephritis being particularly prominent. This study endeavors to discern novel targets as potential therapeutic markers for this condition.

Methods: Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was used to construct the network and select the key hub genes in the co-expression module based on the gene expression dataset GSE81622. Subsequently, functional enrichment and pathway analysis were performed for SLE and lupus nephritis. In addition, also identify genes and differences in SLE with lupus nephritis and methylation site. Finally, qRT-PCR and western blot were used to verify the up-regulated expression levels of the selected key genes.

Results: Within the co-expression modules constructed by WGCNA, the MElightcyan module exhibited the strongest positive correlation with lupus nephritis (0.4, P = 0.003), while showing a weaker correlation with the control group SLE (0.058) and a negative correlation with the control group (-0.41, P = 0.002). Additionally, the MEgreenyellow module displayed the highest positive correlation with SLE (0.25), but its P value was 0.06, which did not reach statistical significance(P > 0.05). Furthermore, it had a negative correlation with the control group was (-0.38, P = 0.004). The module associated with lupus nephritis was characterized by processes such as neutrophil activation (neutrophil_activation), neutrophil degranulation (neutrophil_degranulation), neutrophil activation involved in immune response (neutrophil_activation_involved_in_immune_response), neutrophils mediated immune (neutrophil_mediated_immunity) and white blood cells degranulation (leukocyte_degranulation) and so on the adjustment of the process. Secondly, in the analysis of SLE samples, the identification of differentially expressed genes revealed 125 genes, with 49 being up-regulated and 76 down-regulated. In the case of lupus nephritis samples, 156 differentially expressed genes were discerned, include in 70 up-regulated and 86 down-regulated genes. When examining differential methylation sites, we observed 12432 such sites in the SLE sample analysis, encompassing 2260 hypermethylation sites and 10172 hypomethylation sites. In the lupus nephritis samples analysis, 9613 differential methylation sites were identified, comprising 4542 hypermethylation sites and 5071 hypomethylation sites. Substantiating our findings, experimental validation of the up-regulated genes in lupus nephritis confirmed increased levels of gene expression and protein expression for CEACAM1 and SLC2A5.

Conclusions: We have identified several genes, notably CEACAM1 and SLC2A5, as potential markers for lupus nephritis. Their elevated expression levels and reduced DNA methylation in lupus nephritis contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the aberrant epigenetic regulation of expression in this condition. These findings hold significant implications for the diagnosis and therapeutic strategies of lupus nephritis.