Closing the Gender Gap? A Cohort Comparison of Adolescent Responses to and Attitudes Toward Pornography, 2004 vs. 2021.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Sex Research Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1080/00224499.2024.2408269
M Donevan, M Bladh, Å Landberg, L S Jonsson, G Priebe, I Dennhag, C G Svedin
{"title":"Closing the Gender Gap? A Cohort Comparison of Adolescent Responses to and Attitudes Toward Pornography, 2004 vs. 2021.","authors":"M Donevan, M Bladh, Å Landberg, L S Jonsson, G Priebe, I Dennhag, C G Svedin","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2408269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pornography has become increasingly prevalent and normalized within society, raising questions about how today's adolescents might differ in their responses to and attitudes toward pornography compared to earlier generations. This study begins to fill this gap by comparing cross-sectional data from two cohorts of high school students in Sweden in 2004 (<i>n</i>  = 4,266, mean age = 18.15, <i>SD</i>  = 0.74, 53.9% girls) and 2020-21 (<i>n</i>  = 3,256, mean age = 18.20, <i>SD</i>  = 0.61, 55.4% girls). Gender-stratified bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were performed to examine the impact of survey year on outcomes. Results reveal an increase in frequent pornography use among both genders and a narrowing of the gender gap in responses and attitudes by 2020-21. Boys reported decreased arousal responses, fewer positive emotional responses, and were less inclined to imitate the behaviors seen in pornography. Girls were less averse to and upset by the pornography they encountered. Both genders became more tolerant of pornography, yet more critical of its purported benefits. Notable gender differences remain, especially with girls being more likely to recognize pornography as degrading and exploitative. These findings underscore the need for educational strategies that foster critical understandings of pornography and its societal impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2408269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pornography has become increasingly prevalent and normalized within society, raising questions about how today's adolescents might differ in their responses to and attitudes toward pornography compared to earlier generations. This study begins to fill this gap by comparing cross-sectional data from two cohorts of high school students in Sweden in 2004 (n  = 4,266, mean age = 18.15, SD  = 0.74, 53.9% girls) and 2020-21 (n  = 3,256, mean age = 18.20, SD  = 0.61, 55.4% girls). Gender-stratified bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were performed to examine the impact of survey year on outcomes. Results reveal an increase in frequent pornography use among both genders and a narrowing of the gender gap in responses and attitudes by 2020-21. Boys reported decreased arousal responses, fewer positive emotional responses, and were less inclined to imitate the behaviors seen in pornography. Girls were less averse to and upset by the pornography they encountered. Both genders became more tolerant of pornography, yet more critical of its purported benefits. Notable gender differences remain, especially with girls being more likely to recognize pornography as degrading and exploitative. These findings underscore the need for educational strategies that foster critical understandings of pornography and its societal impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小性别差距?2004 年与 2021 年青少年对色情制品的反应和态度的队列比较》(A Cohort Comparison of Adolescent Responses and Attitudes to Pornography, 2004 vs. 2021)。
色情内容在社会中越来越普遍,也越来越正常化,这就提出了一个问题:与上一代人相比,今天的青少年对色情内容的反应和态度会有什么不同?本研究通过比较 2004 年(n = 4266,平均年龄 = 18.15,SD = 0.74,女生占 53.9%)和 2020-21 年(n = 3256,平均年龄 = 18.20,SD = 0.61,女生占 55.4%)两批瑞典高中生的横截面数据,开始填补这一空白。我们进行了性别分层双变量分析和逻辑回归模型,以研究调查年份对结果的影响。结果显示,到 2020-21 年,经常使用色情制品的男女比例均有所上升,在反应和态度方面的性别差异有所缩小。据报告,男孩的兴奋反应减少,积极情绪反应减少,并且不太愿意模仿色情作品中的行为。女孩对色情制品的厌恶和不安程度较低。男女两性对色情制品的容忍度都有所提高,但对其所谓的益处的批判性更强。两性之间仍然存在明显的差异,尤其是女孩更容易认识到色情制品具有侮辱性和剥削性。这些发现突出表明,有必要制定教育战略,促进对色情制品及其社会影响的批判性理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
期刊最新文献
Trajectories of Sexual Self-Efficacy in Middle and Later Life: Do Gender and Time-Varying Contexts of Marital and Menopausal Transitions Matter? The Sexual Identity Development of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Other Sexual Minority Adults: Diverse Profiles and Their Sociodemographic Correlates. What's in a Name? Public Perceptions of Sex Worker Professionals Are Differentially Influenced by Terminology. Development and Validation of the Online and In-Person Dating App Facilitated Sexual Aggression Perpetration Scales for Men Who Have Sex with Men(O-DAFSA-P-MSM and IP-DAFSA-P-MSM). Emotions, Risks, and Experiences During Sex: A Qualitative Investigation of College Men's Conflicting Sex and Condom Use-Related Alcohol Expectancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1