Xianxian Jiang, Le-Yuan Chen, Juan Li, Fang-Yuan Chen, Nian-An He, Xian-Jun Ye
{"title":"Combination of Different Sectional Elastography Techniques with Age to Optimize the Downgrading of Breast BI-RAIDS Class 4a Nodules.","authors":"Xianxian Jiang, Le-Yuan Chen, Juan Li, Fang-Yuan Chen, Nian-An He, Xian-Jun Ye","doi":"10.2174/0115734056307595240911075111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to optimize the downgrading of BI-RADS class 4a nodules by combining various sectional elastography techniques with age.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed conventional ultrasonography, strain elastography (SE), and shear wave elastography (SWE) on patients. Quantitative parameters recorded included age, cross-sectional and longitudinal area ratios (C-EI/B, L-EI/B), strain rate ratios (C-SR, L-SR), overall average elastic modulus values (C-Emean1, L-Emean1), five-point average elastic modulus values (C-Emean2, L-Emean2), and maximum elastic modulus values (C-Emax, L-Emax).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histopathological evaluations showed that out of 230 lesions, 45 were malignant, and 185 were benign. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional ultrasonography were 100% and 0%, respectively. In contrast, SE and SWE exhibited higher specificity but lower sensitivity. Crosssectional parameters (C-EI/B, C-SR, C-Emean1, C-Emean2, and C-Emax) outperformed their longitudinal counterparts, with C-SR and C-Emax showing the highest specificity (72.43% and 73.51%) and satisfactory sensitivity (80.00% and 88.89%). Combining age with C-SR and C-Emax significantly improved diagnostic efficiency, achieving a sensitivity of 97.78% and a specificity of 77.30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating age with C-SR and C-Emax effectively reduces unnecessary biopsies for most BI-RADS 4a benign lesions while maintaining a very low misdiagnosis rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056307595240911075111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to optimize the downgrading of BI-RADS class 4a nodules by combining various sectional elastography techniques with age.
Materials and methods: We performed conventional ultrasonography, strain elastography (SE), and shear wave elastography (SWE) on patients. Quantitative parameters recorded included age, cross-sectional and longitudinal area ratios (C-EI/B, L-EI/B), strain rate ratios (C-SR, L-SR), overall average elastic modulus values (C-Emean1, L-Emean1), five-point average elastic modulus values (C-Emean2, L-Emean2), and maximum elastic modulus values (C-Emax, L-Emax).
Results: Histopathological evaluations showed that out of 230 lesions, 45 were malignant, and 185 were benign. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional ultrasonography were 100% and 0%, respectively. In contrast, SE and SWE exhibited higher specificity but lower sensitivity. Crosssectional parameters (C-EI/B, C-SR, C-Emean1, C-Emean2, and C-Emax) outperformed their longitudinal counterparts, with C-SR and C-Emax showing the highest specificity (72.43% and 73.51%) and satisfactory sensitivity (80.00% and 88.89%). Combining age with C-SR and C-Emax significantly improved diagnostic efficiency, achieving a sensitivity of 97.78% and a specificity of 77.30%.
Conclusion: Integrating age with C-SR and C-Emax effectively reduces unnecessary biopsies for most BI-RADS 4a benign lesions while maintaining a very low misdiagnosis rate.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.